GM ethical decision making in practice

Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 75-78

  Bruce, Donald ^a  

^a Society   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26044434234     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16118014     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3354/esep002075     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bruce D (2002). Finding a balance over precaution. J Agric Environ Ethics 15:7-16
2. Bruce D, Bruce A (eds) (1998) Engineering Genesis. Earthscan, London
3. Bruce D, Eldridge JT (2000) The role of values in risk perception in the GM debate. In: Cottam MP, Harvey DW,
4. Pape RP, Tait JE (eds) Foresight and precaution. Balkema, Rotterdam
5. Bruce D, Eldridge JT Tait EJ (1996) Genetic risk regulation, society and ethics. In: Risk in a modern society: lessons from Europe. Annual Meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2-5 June 1996. University of Surrey, Centre for Environmental Strategy, Guildford, p 109
6. Chevassus-au-Louis B (2000) Prevention, precaution, consumer involvment: which model for food safety in the future? Paper presented at OECD Conference, GM Food Safety: facts, uncertainties and assessments, Edinburgh, 28 February-1 March 2000
7. Deane-Drummond C (2002). Wisdom with justice. ESEP 2002:65-74
8. ESRC Global Environmental Change Programme (1999) The politics of GM food, risk, science and public trust. University of Sussex, Special Briefing No 5, Brighton
9. European Commission (2000) Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle. European Commission, Brussels
10. House of Lords (1993) Regulation of the United Kingdom Biotechnology Industry and Global Competitiveness. HMSO, HL 80, London
11. House of Lords ((2000) Science and Society. Report of the House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. HMSO, HL, London
12. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (1999) Genetically modified crops: the ethical and social issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London