Testing ecological theory using the information-theoretic approach: Examples and cautionary results

Ecology

Volumn 86, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 2805-2814

  Richards, Shane A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Akaike Information Criterion (AIC); Foraging; Model averaging; Model selection; Theoretical ecology

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 26044431727     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/05-0074     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Pages 267-281 in B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki, editors. Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary.
2. Akaike, H. 1983. Information measures and model selection. International Statistical Institute 44:277-291.
3. Anderson, D. R., K. P. Burnham, and G. C. White. 1998. Comparison of Akaike information criterion and consistent Akaike information criterion for model selection and statistical inference from capture-recapture studies. Journal of Applied Statistics 25:263-282.
4. Buckland, S. T., K. P. Burnham, and N. H. Augustin. 1997. Model selection: an integral part of inference. Biometrics 53:603-618.
5. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2001. Kullback-Leibler information as a basis for strong inference in ecological studies. Wildlife Research 28:111-119.
6. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Second edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
7. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2004. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods and Inference 33:261-304.
8. Cresswell, J. E. 1990. How and why do nectar-foraging bumblebees initiate movements between inflorescences of wild bergamot Monarda fistulosa (Lamiaceae)? Oecologia 82:450-460.
9. Draper, D. 1995. Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 57:45-97.
10. Dreisig, H. 1995. Ideal free distributions of nectar foraging bumblebees. Oikos 72:161-172.
11. Fernández, N., M. Delibes, F. Palomares, and D. J. Mladenoff. 2003. Identifying breeding habitat for the Iberian lynx: inferences from a fine-scale spatial analysis. Ecological Applications 13:1310-1324.
12. Fujiwara, M., and H. Caswell. 2001. Demography of the endangered North Atlantic right whale. Nature 414:537-541.
13. Godínez-Domínguez, E., and J. Freire. 2003. Information-theoretic approach for selection of spatial and temporal models of community organization. Marine Ecology Progress Series 253:17-24.
14. Gurney, W. S. C., and R. M. Nisbet. 1998. Ecological dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
15. Helu, S. L., D. B. Sampson, and Y. Yin. 2000. Application of statistical model selection criteria to the Stock Synthesis assessment program. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:1784-1793.
16. Hilborn, R., and M. Mangel. 1997. The ecological detective: confronting models with data. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
17. Hilborn, R., and C. J. Walters. 1992. Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: choice, dynamics, and uncertainty. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
18. Hurvich, C. M., and C-L. Tsai. 1989. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297-307.
19. Kadmon, R. 1992. Dynamics of forager arrivals and nectar renewal in flowers of Anchusa strigosa. Oecologia 92:552-555.
20. Klinkhamer, P. G., and T. J. de Jong. 1990. Effects of plant size, plant density, and sex differential nectar reward on pollinator visitation in the protandrous Echium vulgare (Boraginacae). Oikos 57:399-405.
21. Kullback, S., and R. A. Leibler. 1951. On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22:79-86.
22. Leirs, H., N. C. Stenseth, J. D. Nichols, J. E. Hines, R. Verhagen, and W. Verheyen. 1997. Stochastic seasonality and non-linear density-dependent factors regulate population size in an African rodent. Nature 389:176-180.
23. Mitchell, R., J. D. Karron, K. G. Holmquist, and J. M. Bell. 2004. The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Functional Ecology 18:116-124.
24. Posada, D., and T. R. Buckley. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike Information Criteria and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Systematic Biology 53:793-808.
25. Possingham, H. P. 1992. Habitat selection by two species of nectarivore: habitat quality isolines. Ecology 73:1903-1912.
26. Pyke, G. H. 1982. Foraging in bumblebees: rule of departure from an inflorescence. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60:417-428.
27. Westphal, M. I., S. A. Field, A. J. Tyre, D. Paton, and H. P. Possingham. 2003. Effects of landscape pattern on bird species distribution in the Mt. Lofty Ranges, South Australia. Landscape Ecology 18:413-426.
28. Zimmerman, M. 1983. Plant reproduction and optimal foraging: environmental nectar manipulations in Delphinium nelsonii. Oikos 41:57-63.