Comparison of CT duodeno-cholangiopancreatography to ERCP for assessing biliary obstruction

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 596-601

  Kielar, Ania ^a   Toa, Hardy ^a   Sekar, Arni ^a   Mimeault, Richard ^a   Jaffey, James ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biliary obstruction; Computed tomography; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DUCTS; ENDOSCOPY; NONINVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES; TUMORS;

BILIARY OBSTRUCTION; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST-ENHANCED; CT PROTOCOL; DIAGNOSTICS TOOLS; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; KAPPA VALUES; PILOT STUDIES; SENSITIVITY VALUES;

PATHOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CT DUODENOCHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; JAUNDICE; LIVER PARENCHYMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREAS DUCT; PILOT STUDY; PORTAL VEIN BLOOD FLOW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 25844520126     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000168364.98309.62     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Kielar A, Tao H. CT duodeno-cholangiopancreatography: a novel CT protocol to assess the obstructed biliary system. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2004; 55:294-296.
2. Nino-Murcia M, Jeffrey RB Jr, Beaulieu CF, et al. Multidetector CT of the pancreas and bile duct system. Value of curved planar reformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:689-693.
3. Takahashi M, Saida Y, Itai Y, et al. Reevaluation of spiral CT cholangiography: basic considerations and reliability for detecting choledocholithiasis in 80 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;24: 859-865.
4. Raptopoulos V, Prassopoulos P, Chuttani R, et al. Multiplanar CT pancreatography and distal cholangiography with minimum intensity projections. Radiology. 1998;212:317-324.
5. Zandrino F, Benzi L, Ferreti ML, et al. Multi-slice CT cholangiography without biliary contrast agent: technique and initial clinical results in the assessment of patients with biliary obstruction. Eur Radiol. 2002;12: 1155-1161.
6. Xu A, Cheng HY, Jian WB, et al. Multi-slice three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography: a new technique for diagnosis of biliary diseases. Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Dis Intl. 2002;1:595-603.
7. Prassopoulos P, Raptopoulos V, Chuttani R, et al. Development of virtual CT cholangiopancreatoscopy. Radiology. 1998;212:570-574.
8. Baille J, Paulson E, Vitellas K. Biliary imaging. Rev Gastroenterol. 2003; 124:1686-1699.
9. Park S, Han J, Kim T, et al. Cholangiography with minimum intensity projection in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: comparison with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Abdom Imaging. 2001;26:281-286.
10. Masui T, Takehara Y, Fujiwara T, et al. MR and CT cholangiography in evaluation of the biliary tract. Acta Radiol. 1998;39:557-567.
11. Chopra S, Chintapalli K, Ramakrishna K, et al. Helical CT cholangiography with oral cholecystographic contrast material. Radiology. 2000;214:596-601.
12. Caoili E, Paulson E, Heyneman L, et al. Cholangiography with three-dimensional volume rendering using an oral biliary contrast agent: feasibility of a novel technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:487-492.