On naive Bayesian fusion of dependent classifiers

Pattern Recognition Letters

Volumn 26, Issue 15, 2005, Pages 2463-2473

  Altinçay, Hakan ^a  

^a EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Best dependent classifiers; Classifier fusion; Independent classifiers; Naive Bayesian fusion

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; PROBABILITY;

BEST DEPENDENT CLASSIFIERS; CLASSIFIER FUSION; INDEPENDENT CLASSIFIERS; NAIVE BAYESIAN FUSION;

CLASSIFIERS;

EID: 25844518769     PISSN: 01678655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. I. Bloch Information combination operators for data fusion: A comparative review with classification IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. 26 1 1996 52 67
2. F. Cremer, K. Schutte, J.G.M. Schavemaker, and E. den Breejen A comparison of decision-level sensor-fusion methods for anti-personnel landmine detection Inform. Fusion 2 2001 187 208
3. M. Demirekler, and H. AltInçay Plurality voting based multiple classifier systems: Statistically independent with respect to dependent classifier sets Pattern Recogn. 35 11 2002 2365 2379
4. Domingos, P., Pazzani, M., 1996. Beyond independence: Conditions for the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 105-112.
5. P. Domingos, and M. Pazzani On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss Mach. Learning 29 1997 103 130
6. R.O. Duda, P.E. Hart, and D.G. Stork Pattern Classification 2000 John Wiley and Sons
7. H.J. Kang, K. Kim, and J.H. Kim Optimal approximation of discrete probability distribution with kth-order dependency and its application to combining multiple classifiers Pattern Recogn. Lett. 18 1997 515 523
8. J. Kittler On combining classifiers IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20 3 1998 226 239
9. L.I. Kuncheva Combining Pattern Classifiers Methods and Algorithms 2004 John Wiley and Sons
10. D.D. Lewis Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval C. Nédellec C. Rouveirol Proceedings of ECML-98, 10th European Conference on Machine Learning, Chemnitz, DE vol. 1398 1998 Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, DE 4 15
11. D.G. Luenberger Introduction to Linear and Nonlinear Programming 1973 Addison-Wesley Pub. Co
12. Rish, I., 2001. An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI workshop on "Empirical Methods in AI".
13. L. Xu, A. Krzyzak, and C.Y. Suen Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. 22 1992 418 435
14. H. Zhang The optimality of naive Bayes Proceedings of the 17th International FLAIRS Conference 2004 AAAI Press