Impact of the Narcotrend Index on propofol consumption and emergence times during total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in children: A clinical utility study

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 741-747

  Weber, F ^a   Pohl, F ^b   Hollnberger, H ^b   Taeger, K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b St Hedwig Children's Hospital   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anaesthesia general; Child; Child, preschool; Electrodiagnosis, electroencephalography; Hypnosis, anaesthetic; Surgical procedures operative, monitoring intraoperative

Indexed keywords

PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL;

ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG MONITORING; DRUG USE; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; INFUSION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; NARCOTREND INDEX; PATIENT MONITORING; PEDIATRICS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEDATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

ANESTHESIA RECOVERY PERIOD; ANESTHESIA, INTRAVENOUS; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; BLOOD PRESSURE; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; INFANT; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PIPERIDINES; PROPOFOL; ROC CURVE; SAMPLE SIZE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 25844514234     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0265021505001237     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Kreuer S, Biedler A, Larsen R et al. Narcotrend monitoring allows faster emergence and a reduction of drug consumption in propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 34-41.
2. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Tait AR et al. Depth of sedation in children undergoing computed tomography: validity and reliability of the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 241-245.
3. Schultz B, Kreuer S, Wilhelm W et al. The Narcotrend Monitor: development and interpretation algorithms [in German]. Anaesthesist 2003; 52: 1143-1148.
4. Schultz B, Grouven U, Schultz A. Automatic classification algorithms of the EEG monitor Narcotrend for routinely recorded EEG data from general anaesthesia: a validation study. Biomed Tech 2002; 47: 9-13.
5. Struys MM, Jensen EW, Smith W et al. Performance of the ARX-derived auditory evoked potential index as an indicator of anesthetic depth: a comparison with bispectral index and hemodynamic measures during propofol administration. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 803-816.
6. Denman WT, Swanson EL, Rosow D et al. Pediatric evaluation of the bispectral index (BIS) monitor and correlation of BIS with end-tidal sevoflurane concentration in infants and children. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 872-877.
7. McCann ME, Bacsik J, Davidson A et al. The correlation of bispectral index with endtidal sevoflurane concentration and haemodynamic parameters in preschoolers. Paediatr Anaesth 2002; 12: 519-525.
8. Recart A, White PF, Wang A et al. Effect of auditory evoked potential index monitoring on anesthetic drug requirements and recovery profile after laparoscopic surgery: a clinical utility study. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 813-818.
9. White PF, Ma H, Tang J et al. Does the use of electroencephalographic bispectral index or auditory evoked potential index monitoring facilitate recovery after desflurane anesthesia in the ambulatory setting? Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 811-817.
10. Weber F, Seidl M, Bein T. Impact of the AEP-Monitor/2-derived composite auditory-evoked potential index on propofol consumption and emergence times during total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005; 49: 277-283.