The current state of quantitative research

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 100-107

  Kamil, Michael L ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Stanford University ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25844513876     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. BRONFENBRENNER, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
3. BRONFENBRENNER, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. CARROLL, J.B., DAVIES, P., & RICHMAN, B. (1971). Word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
5. DUKE, N.K., & MALLETTE, M.H. (2001). Critical issues: Preparation for New Literacy researchers in multi-epistemological, multi-methodological times. Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 345-360.
6. GLASS, G.V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8.
7. GOOD, R., & WANDERSEE, J. (1991). No royal road: More on improving the quality of published educational research. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 24-25.
8. KAMIL, M.L. (1994). More on increasing the quality of educational intervention research: A response to Pressley and Harris. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 223-230.
9. KLARE, G.R. (1984). Readability. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, & P.B. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 681-744). New York: Longman.
10. LOMAX, R.G. (2004). New directions in research: Contemporary methods of quantitative data collection and analysis in literacy research: Whither the future of quantitative literacy research? Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 107-112.
11. MOSENTHAL, P.B., & KAMIL, M.L. (1991). Research in reading and writing: A model of progress. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 1013-1046). New York: Longman.
12. NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF ADULT LITERACY. (2003). National assessment of adult literacy design. Retrieved June 11, 2003, from National Center for Education Statistics website: http://nces.ed. gov/naal/design/design. asp#instrument
13. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14. O'TOOLE, K. (2000, May 8). Eye movement research points to importance of text over graphics on websites. Stanford Online Report. Retrieved May 20, 2003, from http://www.stanford.edu/dept/news/report/news/may10/eyetrack-55.html
15. PRESSLEY, M., & HARRIS, K.R. (1994). Increasing the quality of educational intervention research. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 191-208.
16. SHAVELSON, R.J., & TOWNE, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
17. SHAYWITZ, B., PUGH, K.R., JENNER, A.R., FULBRIGHT, R.K., FLETCHER, J.M., GORE, J.C., et al. (2000). The neurobiology of reading and reading disability (Dyslexia). In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 229-250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. SKINNER, B.F. (1956). A case history in the scientific method. American Psychologist, 11, 221-233.
19. TUCKMAN, B. (1990). A proposal for improving the quality of published educational research. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 22-25.
20. WHITE, S., & CLEMENTS, J. (2001). Assessing the Lexile Framework: Results of a panel meeting (Working Paper No. 2001-08). Retrieved August 20, 2003, from National Center for Education Statistics website: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=200108
21. WRIGHT, B.D., & STENNER, A.J. (1999). One fish, two fish: Rasch measures reading best. Popular Measurement, 2(1), 34-38.