The territorial politics of social policy development in multi-level states

Regional and Federal Studies

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 537-554

  McEwen, Nicola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Policy control; Policy convergence; Policy divergence; Policy ownership; Territorial politics

Indexed keywords

MULTICULTURALISM; OWNERSHIP; POLITICAL DISCOURSE; SOCIAL POLICY; TERRITORIAL DISPUTE;

EID: 25844504218     PISSN: 13597566     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13597560500230722     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adams, J. and Robinson, P. (eds) (2002), Devolution in Practice: Public Policy Differences within the UK, London: IPPR.
2. Banting, K.G. (1995), The Welfare State as Statecraft: Territorial Politics and Canadian Social Policy, in S. Leibfried and P. Pierson, European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute, pp. 269-300.
3. Banting, K.G. (1998), The Past Speaks to the Future: Lessons from the Post-war Social Union, in H. Lazar (ed.), Canada, the State of the Federation 1997: Non-Constitutional Renewal, Kingston: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, pp.39-69.
4. Bergeron, G. (1984), Pratique de l'État au Québec, Montréal: Québec/Amérique.
5. Blair, T., MP, Prime Minister (2003), Now is the time to pull together, not pull apart, Speech delivered at the Burrell Collection, Glasgow, 15 April 2003.
6. Bourassa, R. (1995), Gouverner le Québec, Montréal: Fides.
7. Bradbury, J. and Mitchell, J. (2002), Devolution and Territorial Politics: Stability, Uncertainty and Crisis, Parliamentary Affairs, 55, pp.299-316.
8. Brown, G., MP, Chancellor of the Exchequer (1999), Speech on Britishness, delivered to the London School of Economics, 15 April.
9. Brown, G. and Alexander, D. MPs (1999), New Scotland, New Britain, London: The Smith Institute.
10. Cairney, P. (2004), Convergence and Divergence Following Devolution in Scotland: An Implementation Agenda, Paper for discussion at the Centre for Public Policy and Management, Glasgow Caledonian University.
11. Canada, Government Publications (1945), Dominion-Provincial Conference on Reconstruction: Proposals of the Government of Canada (the Green Book Proposals), August.
12. Canada, Government Publications (1969), Income Security and Social Services, Working paper on the constitution, Ottawa.
13. Canada, Government Publications (1999), A Framework to Improve the Social Union for Canadians, 4 February.
14. Coleman, W.D. (1984), The Independence Movement in Quebec 1945-1.980, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
15. Commission sur le déséquilbre fiscal (2002), Rapport de la Commission sur le déséquilbre fiscal et ses annexes, www.desequilbrefiscal.gouv.qc.ca/index.htm
16. Courchene, T.J. (1994), Social Canada in the Millenium: Reform Imperatives and Restructuring Principles, Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.
17. Dion, S. (then) President of the Privy Council and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs (1998), A New Social Union: Notes for an address at the Sands Hotel, Regina, Saskatchewan, October 15.
18. Dupré, J.S. (1988), Reflections on the Workings of Executive Federalism, in R.D. Olling and M.W. Westmacott (eds) Perspectives on Canadian Federalism, Scarborough, Ont: Prentice Hall Canada, pp.233-56.
19. Gagnon, A.-G. and Segal, H. (2000), Introduction, in A. Gagnon and H. Segal (eds) The Canadian Social Union without Quebec, Montreal: IRRP.
20. Greer, S. (2003), Policy Divergence: Will It Change Something in Greenock?, in R. Hazell (ed.) The State of the Nations 2003: The Third Year of Devolution in the United Kingdom, Exeter: Imprint Academic.
21. Guest, D. (1997), The Emergence of Social Security in Canada, 3rd Edition, Vancouver: UBC Press.
22. Hazell, R. (2000), Intergovernmental Relations: Whitehall Rules OK?, in R. Hazell (ed.) The State of the Nations: The first year of Devolution in the United Kingdom, London: Imprint Academic.
23. Hazell, R. and O'Leary, B. (1999), A Rolling Programme of Devolution: Slippery Slope or Safeguard of the Union?, in R. Hazell (ed.) Constitutional Futures: A History of the Next Ten Years, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Jeffery, C. (2002), Uniformity and Diversity in Policy Provision: Insights from the US, Germany and Canada, in J. Adams and P. Robinson, Devolution in Practice: Public Policy Differences within the UK, London: IPPR.
25. Keating, M. (2002), Devolution and Public Policy in the United Kingdom: Divergence or Convergence? in J. Adams and P. Robinson, Devolution in Practice: Public Policy Differences within the UK, London: IPPR.
26. Keating, M., Stevenson, L., Cairney, P. and MacLean, K. (2004), Does Devolution Make a Difference? Legislative Output and Policy Divergence in Scotland, Journal of Legislative Studies, 9(3).
27. Laurin-Frenette, N. (1978), Production de l'état en formes de la nation, Montréal: Nouvelle Optique.
28. Lazar, H., St-Hilaire, F. and Tremblay, J.-F. (2004), Vertical Fiscal Imbalance: Myth or Reality, in H. Lazar and F. St-Hilaire (eds) Money, Politics and Health Care, Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy, pp. 135-188.
29. Lévesque, B. (2003), Vers un modèle québécois de seconde génération?, in M. Venne, (ed.) Justice, démocratie et prospérité: l'avenir du modèle québécois, Montréal: Québec Amérique, pp.49-70.
30. McEwen, N. (2002), State Welfare Nationalism: The Territorial Impact of Welfare State Development in Scotland, Regional and Federal Studies, 12(1): 66-90.
31. McEwen, N. (2005) Nationalism and the State: Welfare and Identity in Scotland and Quebec, Regionalism and Federalism Series. Presses interuniversitaires européennes/Peter Lang.
32. McEwen, N. and R. Parry (2005), Devolution and the Preservation of the United Kingdom Welfare statS, in N. McEwen and L. Moreno (eds) The Territorial Politics of Welfare, Routledge, forthcoming.
33. McRoberts, K. (1993), Quebec: Social Change and Political Crisis, Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
34. McRoberts, K. (1997), Misconceiving Canada: The Struggle for National Unity, Toronto: Oxford University Press.
35. Marshall, T.H. (with T. Bottomore) (1992), Citizenship and Social Class, London: Pluto Press.
36. Midwinter, A., Keating, M. and Mitchell, J. (1991), Politics and Public Policy in Scotland, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
37. Milner, H. (1978), Politics in the New Québec, Toronto: McLelland and Stewart.
38. Mitchell, J. (2004), Scotland: Expectations, Policy Types and Devolution, in A. Trench (ed.) Has Devolution Made a Difference: The State of the Nations 2004, Exeter: Imprint Academic.
39. Mitchell, J. and the Scottish Monitoring Team (2003), Third Year, Third First Minister, in R. Hazell (ed.) The State of the Nations 2003: The Third Year of Devolution in the United Kingdom, Exeter: Imprint Academic.
40. Mooney, G. and Poole, L. (2004), 'A land of milk and honey'? Social Policy in Scotland after Devolution, Critical Social Policy, 24(4), pp. 458-83.
41. Noël, A. (2001), Power and Purpose in Intergovernmental Relations, Policy Matters, 2(6).
42. Parry, R. (2002), Delivery Structures and Policy Development in Post-devolution Scotland, Social Policy & Society, 1(4), pp.315-24.
43. Paterson, L. (1994), The Autonomy of Modern Scotland, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
44. Pelletier, Benoît, minister délégué aux Affaires intergouvernementales candiennes et aux Affairs autochtones du gouvernement du Québec (2004), L'avenir du Québec au sein de la fédération canadienne, Speech delivered at Dynamiques et enjeux politiques du fédéralisme canadien, a symposium of the Canada Chair in Quebec and Canadian Studies, Université du Québec à Montréal, 1 October.
45. Quebec Liberal Party (2001), Project for Quebec, Report of the Special Committee on the Political and Constitutional Future of Quebec Society, chaired by Benoît Pelletier.
46. Rees, G. (2002), Devolution and the Restructuring of Post-secondary Education and Training in the UK, in J. Adams and P. Robinson, Devolution in Practice: Public Policy Differences within the UK, London, IPPR, pp.104-114.
47. Reynolds, D. (2002), Developing Differently: Educational Policy in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, in J. Adams and P. Robinson, Devolution in Practice: Public Policy Differences within the UK, London, IPPR, pp.93-103.
48. Rouillard, J. (1997), Duplessis: le Québec vire à droit, in A.-G. Gagnon, and M. Sarra-Bournet, Duplessis: Entre la Grande Noirceur et la Sociéte libérale, Montréal: Québec/Amérique.
49. Saint-Martin, D. (2004), La réforme de l'État providence: L'État social québécois n'a pas été que producteur de corporatismes mais ausii d'identité, La Presse, 8 January.
50. Scottish Constitutional Convention (1995), Scotland's Parliament, Scotland's Right, Edinburgh.
51. Simeon, R. (1972), Federal-Provincial Diplomacy: The Making of Recent Policy in Canada, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
52. Simeon, R. (2003), Free Personal Care: Policy Divergence and Social Citizenship, in R. Hazell (ed.) The State of the Nations 2003, Thorverton: Imprint Academic.
53. Stevenson, G. (1979), Unfulfilled Union, Toronto: Macmillan.
54. Stewart, J. (2004), Taking Stock: Scottish Social Welfare after Devolution, Bristol: Policy Press.
55. Surridge, P. and D. McCrone (1999), The 1997 Scottish referendum Vote, in B. Taylor and K. Thompson, Scotland and Wales: Nations Again?, Cardiff: University of Wales Press, pp.41-64.
56. Vaillancourt, Y. (1988), L'Évolution des Politiques Sociales au Québec, 1940-1960, Montréal: Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal.
57. Venne, M. (ed.) (2003), Justice, démocratie et prospérité: l'avenir du modèle québécois, Montréal: Québec Amérique.
58. Woods, K. (2002), Health Policy and the NHS in the UK 1997-2002, in J. Adams and P. Robinson (eds) Devolution in Practice: Public Policy Differences within the UK, London: IPPR.
59. UK Government (1999), Memorandum of Understanding and supplementary agreements between the United Kingdom government, Scottish Ministers and the Cabinet of the National Assembly for Wales, London: HMSO, Cmnd 4444.