Experimenting with the interaction between aggregation and text structuring

Proceedings of the 1st Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, NAACL 2000 - co-located with 6th Applied Natural Language Processing Conference, ANLP 2000 - Student Research Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 1-6

  Cheng, Hua ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EVALUATION RESULTS; GENERATION SYSTEMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION; PIPELINE ARCHITECTURE; TEXT PLANNING;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 25844499036     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Douglas Appelt. 1985. Planning english referring expressions. Artificial Intelligence, 26:1-33.
2. Hua Cheng. 1998. Embedding new information into referring expressions. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL'98, pages 1478-1480, Montreal, Canada.
3. Barbara Grosz, Aravind Joshi, and Scott Weinstein. 1995. Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2):203-226.
4. William Mann and Sandra Thompson. 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization. Technical Report ISI/RR-87-190, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.
5. Chris Mellish, Alistair Knott, Jon Oberlander, and Mick O'Donnell. 1998. Experiments us- ing stochastic search for text planning. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Ontario, Canada.
6. Marie Meteer. 1992. Expressibility and The Problem of Efficient Text Planning. Communication in Artificial Intelligence. Pinter Publishers Limited, London.
7. Jon Oberlander, Alistair Knott, Mick O'Donnell, and Chris Mellish. 1999. Beyond elaboration: Generating descriptive texts containing it-clefts. In T Sanders, J Schilperoord, and W Spooren, editors, Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects. Benjamins, Amsterdam.
8. Massimo Poesio, Renata Vieira, and Simone Teufel. 1997. Resolving bridging references in unrestricted text. Research paper hcrc-rp87, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.
9. Michael Reape and Chris Mellish. 1999. Just what is aggregation anyway? In Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 20-29, Toulouse, Prance.
10. Ehud Reiter and Robert Dale. 1997. Building applied natural language generation systems. Natural Language Engineering, 3(l):57-87.
11. Ehud Reiter. 1994. Has a consensus nl generation architecture appeared, and is it psycholinguistically plausible? In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation.
12. Donia Scott and Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza. 1990. Getting the Message Across in RST-based Text Generation. In R. Dale, C. Mellish, and M. Zock, editors, Current Research in Natural Language Generation, pages 47-73. Academic Press.
13. John Wilkinson. 1995. Aggregation in Natural Language Generation: Another Look. Technical report, Computer Science Department, University of Waterloo.