Secondary-care treatment patterns in the UK for women with urinary incontinence

BJU International

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 839-842

  Wagg, Adrian ^a   Das Gupta, Roben ^b   Assassa, Philip ^c   Shaw, Christine ^d   Mayne, Chris ^e   Martin, Mona ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

^b BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM LTD   (United Kingdom)

^c MID YORKSHIRE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e LEICESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f Health Research Associates Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Incontinence; Secondary care; Treatment patterns

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOMETRY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NURSE; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PREVALENCE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOTLAND; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 25844475195     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05723.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Jolleys J. Reported prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in a general practice. Br Med J 1988; 296: 1300-2
2. Thomas TM, Plymat KR, Blannin J, Meade TW. Prevalence of urinary incontinence. Br Med J 1980; 281: 1243-5
3. Harrison GL, Memel DS. Urinary incontinence in women: its prevalence and its management in a health promotion clinic. Br J Gen Prac 1994; 44: 149-52
4. Perry S, Shaw C, Assassa P et al. An epidemiological study to establish the prevalence of urinary symptoms and felt need in the community: the Leicestershire MRC Incontinence Study. J Public Health Med 2000; 22: 427-34
5. Brocklehurst J. Urinary incontinence in the community - analysis of a MORI poll. Br Med J 1993; 306: 832-4
6. Horrocks S, Somerset M, Stoddart H, Peters TJ. What prevents older people from seeking treatment for urinary incontinence? A qualitative exploration of barriers to the use of community continence services. Fam Pract 2004; 21: 689-96
7. Shaw C, Tansey R, Jackson C, Hyde C, Allan R. Barriers to help seeking in people with urinary symptoms. Fam Pract 2001; 18: 48-52
8. DoH. Good Practice in Continence Services. London UK: Department of Health, 2000
9. Hunskar S, Lose G, Sykes D, Voss S. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU Int 2004; 93: 324-30
10. DoH. The NHS Plan. A plan for investment, a plan for reform. London UK: Department of Health, 2000
11. Hutchings A, Griffiths J, Black NA. Surgery for stress incontinence: factors associated with a successful outcome. Br J Urol 1998; 82: 634-41
12. Weidner AC, Myers ER, Visco AG, Cundiff GW, Bump RC. Which women with stress incontinence require urodynamic evaluation? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 20-7
13. Hashimoto K, Ohnishi N, Esa A, Sugiyama T, Park Y-C, Kurita T. Clinical efficacy of oxybutynin on sensory urgency as compared with motor urgency. Urologia Int 1999; 62: 12-6
14. Malone-Lee J, Henshaw DJ, Cummings K. Urodynamic verification of an overactive bladder is not a prerequisite for antimuscarinic treatment response. BJU Int 2003; 92: 415-7
15. Massey JA, Abrams PH. Obstructed voiding in the female. Br J Urol 1988; 61: 36-9
16. Abrams P, Klevmark B. Frequency volume charts. An indispensable part of lower urinary tract assessment. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 1996; 179: 47-53
17. Jaffe-Jamison S, Ginsberg-Phillip C, Silverberg-Daniel M, Harkaway-Richard C. The need for voiding diaries in the evaluation of men with nocturia. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2002; 102: 261-5
18. Abrams P, Khoury S, Wein A, eds. 2nd International Consultation on Incontinence. Plymouth UK: Plymbridge Distributors Ltd, 2002