Construct validity of the misrepresentation scales of the Psychological Screening Inventory

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 197-206

  Lanyon, Richard I ^a   Cunningham, Katie S ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENTAL DISEASE; MINNESOTA MULTIPHASIC PERSONALITY INVENTORY; MORALITY; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; RATING SCALE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RELIABILITY; SCREENING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIMULATOR; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 25844468261     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8502_12     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arbisi, P. A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1995). An MMPI-2 infrequent response scale for use with psychopathological populations: The Infrequency-Psychopathology scale, F(p). Psychological Assessment. 7, 424-431.
2. Arbisi, P. A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1998). The ability of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory - 2 validity scales to detect fake-bad responses in psychiatric inpatients. Psychological Assessment, 10, 221-228.
3. Baer, R. A. & Miller, J. (2002). Underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI-2: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 14, 16-26.
4. Baer, R. A., Wetter, M. W., & Berry, D. T. R. (1992). Detection of underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 509-525.
5. Baer, R. A., Wetter, M. W., Nichols, D. S., Greene, R., & Berry, D. T. R. (1995). Sensitivity of MMPI-2 validity scales to under-reporting of symptoms. Psychological Assessment, 7, 419-423.
6. Bagby, R. M., Buis, T., & Nicholson, R. A. (1995). Relative effectiveness of the standard validity scales in detecting fake-bad and fake-good responding: Replication and extension. Psychological Assessment, 7, 85-92.
7. Berry, D. T. R., Baer, R. A., & Harris, M. J. (1991). Detection of malingering on the MMPI: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 585-598.
8. Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). MMPI-2: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality lnventory-2: Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9. Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). MMPI-2: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation (Rev. ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
10. Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Williams, C. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1990). Development and use of the MMPI-2 content scales. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11. Butcher, J. N., & Han, K. (1995). Development of an MMPI-2 scale to assess the presentation of self in a superlative manner: The S scale. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 10, pp. 25-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Dawes, R. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1966). Mixed group validation: A method for determining the validity of diagnostic signs without using criterion groups. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 63-67.
13. Frederick, R. I. (2000). Mixed group validation: A method to address the limitations of criterion group validation in research on malingering detection. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 693-718.
14. Gough, H. G. (1954). Some common misperceptions about neuroticism. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 18, 289-292.
15. Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943). The Minnesota Muliphasic Personality Inventory manual. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
17. Hsu, L. M. (2002). Diagnostic validity statistics and the MCMI-III. Psychological Assessment, 13, 410-422.
18. Lanyon, R. I. (1970). Development and validation of a psychological screening inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(1, Supplement 2), 1-24.
19. Lanyon, R. I. (1973). Psychological Screening Inventory: Manual. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press.
20. Lanyon, R. I. (1978). Psychological Screening Inventory: Manual (2nd ed.). Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
21. Lanyon, R. I. (1993). Development of scales to assess specific deception strategies on the Psychological Screening Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 5, 324-329.
22. Lanyon, R. I. (1996). Assessment of specific deception strategies used by personality inventory respondents. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 14, 37-53.
23. Lanyon, R. I. (1997). Detecting deception: Current models and directions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 4, 377-387.
24. Lanyon, R. I. (2001). Dimensions of self-serving misrepresentation in forensic assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 169-179.
25. Lanyon, R. I. (2003). Assessing the misrepresentation of health problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 1-10.
26. Lanyon, R. I. (2004). Favorable self-presentation on psychological inventories: An analysis. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 22, 53-65.
27. Lanyon, R. I., & Aimer, E. R. (2001). Multimodal assessment of self-serving misrepresentation during personal injury litigation. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 19, 5-14.
28. Lanyon, R. I., & Almer, E. R. (2002). Characteristics of compensable disability patients who choose to litigate. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 30, 400-404.
29. Lanyon, R. I., Dannenbaum, S., Wolf, L. L., & Brown, A. (1989). Dimensions of deceptive responding in criminal offenders. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1, 300-304.
30. Paulhus, D. L. (1986). Self-deception and impression management in test responses. In A. Angleitner & J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaire (pp. 143-165). New York: Springer.
31. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR). In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic.
32. Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS): The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding - 7: User's manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
33. Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748.
34. Rogers, R., Harrell, E. H., & Liff, C. D. (1993). Feigning neuropsychological impairment: A critical review of methodological and clinical considerations. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 255-274.
35. Rogers, R., Salekin, R. T., Sewell, K. W., Goldstein, A. M., & Leonard, K. (1998). A comparison of forensic and nonforensic malingerers: A prototypical analysis of explanatory models. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 353-367.
36. Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., & Goldstein, A. M. (1994). Explanatory models of malingering: A prototypical analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 543-552.
37. Ruehlman, L. S., Lanyon, R. I., & Karoly, P. (1998). Multidimensional Health Profile: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
38. Strong, D. R., Greene, R. L., & Kordinak, S. T. (2002). Taxometric analysis of impression management and self-deception in college student and personnel evaluation settings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 161-175.
39. Swets, J. A. (1992). The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics. American Psychologist, 47, 522-532.
40. Wiggins, J. S. (1959). Interrelationships among MMPI measures of dissimulation under standard and social desirability instructions. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 419-427.