The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 466-471

  White, Sarah J ^a   Rayner, Keith ^b   Liversedge, Simon P ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25644455214     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193789     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. BALOTA, D. A., POLLATSEK, A., & RAYNER, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364-390.
2. BRYSBAERT, M., & VITU, F. (1998). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 125-148). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. CLARK, J. J., & O'REGAN, J. K. (1999). Word ambiguity and the optimal viewing position in reading. Vision Research, 39, 843-857.
4. DRIEGHE, D., BRYSBAERT, M., DESMET, T., & DE BAECKE, C. (2004). Word skipping in reading: On the interplay of linguistic and visual factors. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 79-103.
5. EHRLICH, S. F., & RAYNER, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20, 641-655.
6. FRANCIS, W. N., & KUČERA, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
7. HOCHBERG, J. (1975). On the control of saccades in reading. Vision Research, 15, 620.
8. INHOFF, A. W., RADACH, R., EITER, B. M., & JUHASZ, B. (2003). Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 803-827.
9. INHOFF, A. W., STARR, M., LIU, W., & WANG, J. (1998). Eye-movement-contingent display changes are not compromised by flicker and phosphor persistence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 101-106.
10. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & O'REGAN, J. K. (1981). Expectations increase the benefit derived from parafoveal visual information in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 634-644.
11. O'REGAN, [J.] K. (1979). Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 501-509.
12. RAYNER, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
13. RAYNER, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 8, 21-30.
14. RAYNER, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
15. RAYNER, K., & MCCONKIE, G. W. (1976). What guides a reader's eye movements? Vision Research, 16, 829-837.
16. RAYNER, K., & WELL, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 504-509.