T1-weighted MRI characteristics of pedal osteomyelitis

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 185, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 386-393

  Collins, Mark S ^a   Schaar, Matthew M ^a   Wenger, Doris E ^a   Mandrekar, Jawayant N ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW SCINTISCANNING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FOOT DISEASE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOMYELITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RELIABILITY; BONE MARROW; FOOT; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE MARROW; CONTRAST MEDIA; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FOOT BONES; FOOT DISEASES; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOMYELITIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 25644441775     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.185.2.01850386     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Unger E, Moldofsky P, Gatenby R, Hartz W, Broder G. Diagnosis of osteomyelitis by MR imaging. AJR 1988; 150:605-610
2. Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Bock GE, et al. Diagnosis of osteomyelitis: utility of fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 189:251-257
3. Morrisoo WB, Schweitzer ME, Batte WG, Radack DP, Russel KM. Osteomyelitis of the foot: relative importance of primary and secondary MR imaging signs. Radiology 1998; 207:625-632
4. Ledermann WP, Morrison WB, Schweitzer MR. MR image analysis of pedal osteomyelitis: distribution, patterns of spread, and frequency of associated ulceration and septic arthritis. Radiology 2002; 223:747-755
5. Craig JG, Amin MB, Wu K, et al. Osteomyelitis of the diabetic fool: MR imaging-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1997; 203:849-855
6. Erdman WA, Tamburro F, Jayson HT, Weatherall PT, Ferry KB, Peshock RM. Osteomyelitis: characteristics and pitfalls of diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 180:533-539
7. Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Wapner KL, Hecht PJ, Gannon FH, Behm WR. Osteomyelitis in feet of diabetics: clinical accuracy, surgical utility and cost-effectiveness of MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 196:557-564
8. Beltran J, Campanini DS, Knight C, McCalla M. The diabetic foot: magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Skeletal Radiol 1990; 19:37-41
9. Schmid MR, Hodler J, Vienne P, Binkert CA, Zanetti M. Bone marrow abnormalities of foot and ankle: STIR versus T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology 2002; 224:463-469
10. Jones KM, Unger EC, Granstrom P, Seeger JF, Carmody RF, Yoshino M. Bone marrow imaging using STIR at 0.5 and 1.5T. Magn Reson Imaging 1992; 10:169-176
11. Schweitzer ME, White LM. Does altered biomechanics cause marrow edema? Radiology 1996; 198:851-853
12. 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy, and MR imaging. AJR 1989; 152:795-800
13. Levine SE, Neagle CE, Esterhai JL, Wright DG, Dalinka MK. Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in the diabetic patient with a foot ulcer. Foot Ankle Int 1994; 15:151-156
14. Croll SD, Nicholas GG, Osborne MA, Wasser TE, Jones S. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in diabetic foot infections. J Vasc Surg 1996; 24:266-270