Pharmacy decision support: Where is it? A systematic literature review

International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 157-163

  Calabretto, Jean Pierre ^a   Warren, Jim ^a,b,c   Bird, Linda ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b Advanced Computing Research Centre

^c South Australia Distributed Systems Technology Centre (DSTC)   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; CANADA; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRONICS; HOSPITAL PHARMACY; INTERNET; MEDLINE; PHARMACIST; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 25444515487     PISSN: 09617671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1211/ijpp.13.3.0001     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Runciman W, Moller J. Iatrogenic injury in Australia. Adelaide: Patient Safety Foundation; 2001.
2. Ortiz E, Meyer G, Burstin H. Clinical informatics and patient safety at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002;9:S2-7.
3. European Commission. e-Health - making healthcare better for European citizens: an action plan for a European e-Health Area. Brussels: European Commission; 2004.
4. Electronic Prescribing Initiative. Electronic prescribing: toward maximum value and rapid adoption. Recommendations for optimal design and implementation to improve care, increase efficiency and reduce costs in ambulatory care. Washington, DC: eHealth Initiative; 2004.
5. Bates DW, Gawande AA. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2526-34.
6. Sowerby Centre for Health Informatics. eHealth horizons. Report no. 1.0. Newcastle, UK: University of Newcastle; 2000.
7. National Institute of Clinical Studies 2002. Report of the Electronic Decision Support Governance Workshop. In: Studies NIoC (editor). Turning evidence into action, electronic decision support governance workshop; 23 November 2001. Melbourne: National Health Information Management Advisory Council; 2002.
8. Roughead L, Semple S. Second national report on patient safety: Improving Medication Safety. Canberra: Australian Council for Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2002.
9. Leonard KJ. Critical Success Factors relating to healthcare's adoption of new technology: a guide to increasing the likelihood of successful adoption. Electronic Healthcare 2004;2:72-81.
10. National Health Information Management Advisory Council. Health online: a health information action plan for Australia, 2nd ed. Canberra: Commonwealth Government of Australia; 2001.
11. The national strategy for quality use of medicines: plain English edition; Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2002.
12. Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ 2001;323:908-11.
13. Gowan J, Roller L. The pharmacist and patient-focused care. Aust J Pharm 2004;85:275-9.
14. Whitehead PA, Sunderland V, Benrimoj S. The 'general practice' pharmacist. Aust J Pharm 2003;84:24-7.
15. Hepler CD, Strand LM. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990;47:533-43.
16. Department of Health Social Services and Public Safety (Northern Ireland). Pharmacy in practice, www.dhsspsni.-gov.uk/pgroups/pharmaceutical/ pharmacy.asp#comm_role (accessed May 3, 2005).
17. Millonig MK, Jackson TL, Ellis WM. Improving medication use through pharmacists' access to patient-specific health care information. J Am Pharm Assoc 2002;42:638-45.
18. Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe Foundation. The PCNE Classification V 5.00: 2003 www.pcne.org/ (accessed May 3, 2005).
19. Krska J, Jamieson D, Arris F et al. A classification system for issues identified in pharmaceutical care practice. Int J Pharm Pract 2002;10:91-100.
20. National Electronic Decision Support Taskforce. Electronic Decision Support for Australia's Health Sector. Report. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia; 2003.
21. Quality Use of Medicines Project Mapping www.qummap. health.gov.au/ (accessed April 30, 2005).
22. ComputerTalk www.computertalk.com/index.html?=From MainFrame=AboutUs.html (accessed April 30, 2005).
23. Murray MD, Loos B, Tu W, Eckert GJ, Zhou X-H, Tierney WM. Effects of computer-based prescribing on pharmacist work patterns. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998;5:546-53.
24. Amsden D. Push technology in the pharmacy. Clinical decision support helps the pharmacy department of a South Carolina medical center automate monitoring of medication effectiveness. Health Manag Technol 2003;24:28-31.
25. Armstrong EP, Denemark CR. How pharmacists respond to on-line, real-time DUR alerts. J Am Pharm Assoc 1998;38:149-54.
26. Monane M, Matthias DM, Nagle BA, Kelly MA. Improving prescribing patterns for the elderly through an online drug utilization review intervention: a system linking the physician, pharmacist, and computer. JAMA 1998;280:1249-52.
27. www.coiera.com/ailist/list.html (accessed May 3, 2005).
28. http://openclinical.org/aisinpractice.html (accessed May 3, 2005).
29. http://medexpert.imc.akh-wien.ac.at/ (accessed May 3, 2005).
30. www.pharmacists.ca/content/hcp/Resource_Centre/Pharmacy_ Practice_Research/cppr_list.cfm (accessed April 30, 2005).
31. Forum. 2000 and counting - the application of IT to modern pharmacy practice. Pharm J 2000;264:487-90.
32. Delivering 21st century IT support for the NHS. National Strategic Programme. London: Department of Health UK; 2002.
33. Giles-Burness DA, Roberts RI. Modernising pharmacy. The Stockport experience of producing a pharmacy development strategy in the new National Health Service. Pharm J 2002;268:218-20.
34. Dooley MJ, Allen KM, Doecke CJ et al. A prospective multicentre study of pharmacist initiated changes to drug therapy and patient management in acute care government funded hospitals. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003;57:513-21.
35. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Gorman PN et al. A taxonomy of generic clinical questions: classification study. BMJ 2000;321:429-32.
36. Coiera E. Interaction design theory. Int J Med Inf 2003;69:205-22.