Psychological and physiological adaptations to sperm competition in humans

Review of General Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 228-248

  Shackelford, Todd K ^a   Pound, Nicholas ^b   Goetz, Aaron T ^a,b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evolutionary psychology; Postcopulatory competition; Sperm competition

Indexed keywords

EID: 25444511319     PISSN: 10892680     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.3.228     Document Type: Review

References (133)

1. Alexander, R. D. (1979). Sexuality and sociality in humans and other primates. In A. Katchadourian (Ed.), Human sexuality (pp. 81-97). Berkeley: University of California Press.
2. Almquist, J. O. (1973). Effects of sexual preparation on sperm output, semen characteristics and sexual activity of beef bulls with a comparison to dairy bulls. Journal of Animal Science, 36, 331-336.
3. Almquist, J. O., Hale, E. B., & Amann, R. P. (1958). Sperm production and fertility of dairy bulls at high collection frequencies with varying degrees of sexual preparation. Journal of Dairy Science, 41, 733.
4. Ambriz, D., Rosales, A. M., Sotelo, R., Mora, J. A., Rosado, A., & Garcia, A. R. (2002). Changes in the quality of rabbit semen in 14 consecutive ejaculates obtained every 15 minutes. Archives of Andrology, 48, 389-395.
5. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Arndt, W. B., Jr., Foehl, J. C., & Good, F. E. (1985). Specific sexual fantasy themes: A multidimensional study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 472-480.
7. Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1988). "Kamikaze" sperm in mammals? Animal Behaviour, 36, 936-939.
8. Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1989a). Elaboration of the kamikaze sperm hypothesis: A reply to Harcourt. Animal Behaviour, 37, 865-867.
9. Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1989b). Number of sperm in human ejaculates varies in accordance with sperm competition theory. Animal Behaviour, 37, 867-869.
10. Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993a). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate adjustment by males and the function of masturbation. Animal Behaviour, 46, 861-885.
11. Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993b). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Animal Behaviour, 46, 887-909.
12. Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1995). Human sperm competition. London: Chapman & Hall.
13. Baur, B. (1998). Sperm competition in molluscs. In T. R. Birkhead & A. P. Møller (Eds.), Sperm competition and sexual selection (pp. 255-305). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Bellis, M. A., & Baker, R. R. (1990). Do females promote sperm competition: Data for humans. Animal Behavior, 40, 197-199.
15. Bellis, M. A., Baker, R. R., & Gage, M. J. G. (1990). Variation in rat ejaculates consistent with the kamikaze sperm hypothesis. Journal of Mammalogy, 71, 479-480.
16. Birkhead, T. R., & Møller, A. P. (1992). Sperm competition in birds. London: Academic Press.
17. Birkhead, T. R., Moore, H. D. M., & Bedford, J. M. (1997). Sex, science, and sensationalism. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 121-122.
18. Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion. New York: Free Press.
19. Buss, D. M. (2004). The evolution of desire (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
20. Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmel-roth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251-255.
21. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
22. Cohen, J. (1973). Cross-overs, sperm redundancy and their close association. Heredity, 31, 408-413.
23. Cohen, J. (1977). Reproduction. London: Butter-worth.
24. Collins, W. J., Bratton, R. W., & Henderson, C. R. (1951). The relationship of semen production to sexual excitement of dairy bulls. Journal of Dairy Science, 34, 224-227.
25. Cook, P. A., & Wedell, N. (1996). Ejaculate dynamics in butterflies: A strategy for maximizing fertilization success? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 263, 1047-1051.
26. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1980). Discriminative parental solicitude: A biological perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 277-288.
27. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1982). Whom are newborn babies said to resemble? Ethology and Sociobiology, 3, 69-78.
28. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1995). Discriminative parental solicitude and the relevance of evolutionary models to the analysis of motivational systems. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1269-1286). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, J. (1982). Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3, 11-27.
30. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.
31. DelBarco-Trillo, J., & Ferkin, M. H. (2004). Male mammals respond to a risk of sperm competition conveyed by odours of conspecific males. Nature, 431, 446-449.
32. Dewsbury, D. A. (1982). Ejaculate cost and male choice. American Naturalist, 119, 601-610.
33. Dixson, A. F. (1998). Primate sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Eberhard, W. G. (1996). Female control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. Ellis, B. J., & Symons, D. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary psychological approach. Journal of Sex Research, 27, 527-555.
36. Fenton, M. B. (1984). The case of vepertilionid and rhinolophid bats. In R. L. Smith (Ed.), Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems (pp. 573-587). London: Academic Press.
37. Gage, A. R., & Barnard, C. J. (1996). Male crickets increase sperm number in relation to competition and female size. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 38, 349-353.
38. Gage, M. J. G. (1991). Risk of sperm competition directly affects ejaculate size in the Mediterranean fruit fly. Animal Behaviour, 42, 1036-1037.
39. Gage, M. J. G. (1994). Associations between body-size, mating pattern, testis size and sperm lengths across butterflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 258, 247-254.
40. Gage, M. J. G., & Baker, R. R. (1991). Ejaculate size varies with sociosexual situation in an insect. Ecological Entomology, 16, 331-337.
41. Gallup, G. G., & Burch, R. L. (2004). Semen displacement as a sperm competition strategy in humans. Evolutionary Psychology, 2, 12-23.
42. Gallup, G. G., Burch, R. L., Zappieri, M. L., Parvez, R. A., Stockwell, M. L., & Davis, J. A. (2003). The human penis as a semen displacement device. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 277-289.
43. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573-587.
44. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver, C. E. (2002). Changes in women's sexual interests and their partner's mate-retention tactics across the menstrual cycle: Evidence for shifting conflicts of interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 269, 975-982.
45. Ginsberg, J. R., & Rubenstein, D. I. (1990). Sperm competition and variation in zebra mating behavior. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26, 427-434.
46. Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Euler, H. A., Hoier, S., Schmitt, D. P., & LaMunyon, C. W. (2005). Mate retention, semen displacement, and human sperm competition: A preliminary investigation of tactics to prevent and correct female infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 749-763.
47. Gomendio, M., Harcourt, A. H., & Roldán, E. R. S. (1998). Sperm competition in mammals. In T. R. Birkhead & A. P. Møller (Eds.), Sperm competition and sexual selection (pp. 667-756). New York: Academic Press.
48. Gomendio, M., & Roldán, E. R. S. (1993). Mechanisms of sperm competition: Linking physiology and behavioral ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 95-100.
49. Gould, S. J. (1987). Freudian slip. Natural History, 96, 14-21.
50. Gould, T. (1999). The lifestyle. New York: Firefly.
51. Greiling, H., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Women's sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929-963.
52. Hafs, H. D., Kinsey, R. C., & Desjardins, C. (1962). Sperm output of dairy bulls with varying degrees of sexual preparation. Journal of Dairy Science, 45, 788-793.
53. Harcourt, A. H. (1989). Deformed sperm are probably not adaptive. Animal Behaviour, 37, 863-865.
54. Harcourt, A. H., Harvey, P. H., Larson, S. G., & Short, R. V. (1981). Testis weight, body weight, and breeding system in primates. Nature, 293, 55-57.
55. Harvey, P. H., & Harcourt, A. H. (1984). Sperm competition, testis size, and breeding systems in primates. In R. L. Smith (Ed.), Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems (pp. 589-600). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
56. Hosken, D. J., & Ward, P. I. (2001). Experimental evidence for testis size evolution via sperm competition. Ecology Letters, 4, 10-13.
57. Hrdy, S. B. (1981). The woman that never evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Hunt, M. (1974). Sexual behavior in the 70s. Chicago: Playboy Press.
59. Jennions, M. D., & Passmore, N. I. (1993). Sperm competition in frogs: Testis size and a sterile male experiment on Chiromantis-xerampelina (Rhacophoridae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 50, 211-220.
60. Jennions, M. D., & Petrie, M. (2000). Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews, 75, 21-64.
61. Johnson, A. M., Mercer, C. H., Erens, B., Copas, A. J., McManus, S., Wellings, K., et al. (2001). Sexual behaviour in Britain: Partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours. Lancet, 358, 1835-1842.
62. Kura, T., & Nakashima, Y. (2000). Conditions for the evolution of soldier sperm classes. Evolution, 54, 72-80.
63. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 469-496.
65. Mallidis, C., Howard, E. J., & Baker, H. W. G. (1991). Variation of semen quality in normal men. International Journal of Andrology, 14, 99-107.
66. Marconato, A., & Shapiro, D. Y. (1996). Sperm allocation, sperm production and fertilization rates in the bucktooth parrotfish. Animal Behaviour, 52, 971-980.
67. Møller, A. P. (1985). Mixed reproductive strategy and mate guarding in a semi-colonial passerine, the swallow Hirundo rustica. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 17, 401-408.
68. Møller, A. P. (1987). Mate guarding in the swallow Hirundo rustica. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 21, 119-123.
69. Møller, A. P. (1988a). Paternity and paternal care in the swallow, Hirundo rustica. Animal Behaviour, 36, 996-1005.
70. Møller, A. P. (1988b). Testes size, ejaculate quality and sperm competition in birds. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 33, 273-283.
71. Moore, H. D., Dvorakova, K., Jenkins, N., & Breed, W. (2002). Exceptional sperm cooperation in the wood mouse. Nature, 418, 174-177.
72. Moore, H. D., Martin, M., & Birkhead, T. R. (1999). No evidence for killer sperm or other selective interactions between human spermatozoa in ejaculates of different males in vitro. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 266, 2343-2350.
73. Nakatsuru, K., & Kramer, D. L. (1982, May 14). Is sperm cheap: Male fertility and female choice in the lemon tetra (Pisces characidae). Science, 216, 753-755.
74. Olsson, M., Madsen, T., & Shine, R. (1997). Sperm really so cheap? Costs of reproduction in male adders, Vipera berus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 264, 455-459.
75. Padova, G., Tita, P., Briguglia, G., & Giuffrida, D. (1988). Influence of abstinence length on ejaculate characteristics. Acta Europaea Fertilitatis, 19, 29-31.
76. Parker, G. A. (1970). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Reviews, 45, 525-567.
77. Parker, G. A. (1982). Why are there so many tiny sperm? Sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexes. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 96, 281-294.
78. Parker, G. A. (1990). Sperm competition games: Raffles and roles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 242, 120-126.
79. Parker, G. A. (1998). Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: Towards a theory base. In T. R. Birkhead & A. P. Møller (Eds.), Sperm competition and sexual selection (pp. 3-54). New York: Academic Press.
80. Parker, G. A., Ball, M. A., Stockley, P., & Gage, M. J. G. (1997). Sperm competition games: A prospective analysis of risk assessment. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 264, 1793-1802.
81. Pelletier, L. A., & Herold, E. S. (1988). The relationship of age, sex guilt, and sexual experience with female sexual fantasies. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 250-256.
82. Person, E. S., Terestman, N., Myers, W. A., Goldberg, E. L., & Salvadori, C. (1989). Gender differences in sexual behaviors and fantasies in a college population. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 15, 187-198.
83. Pillsworth, E. G., Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2004). Ovulatory shifts in female sexual desire. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 55-65.
84. Pizzari, T., & Birkhead, T. R. (2000). Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males. Nature, 405, 787-789.
85. Platek, S. M. (2003). Effects of paternal resemblance on paternal investment: An evolutionary model. Evolution and Cognition, 9, 189-197.
86. Pound, N. (1999). Effects of morphine on electrically evoked contractions of the vas deferens in two congeneric rodent species differing in sperm competition intensity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 266, 1755-1858.
87. Pound, N. (2002). Male interest in visual cues of sperm competition risk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 443-466.
88. Pound, N., & Daly, M. (2000). Functional significance of human female orgasm still hypothetical. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 620-621.
89. Pound, N., & Gage, M. J. G. (2004). Prudent sperm allocation in Rattus norvegicus: A mammalian model of adaptive ejaculate adjustment. Animal Behaviour, 68, 819-823.
90. Pound, N., Javed, M. H., Ruberto, C., Shaikh, M. A., & Del Valle, A. P. (2002). Duration of sexual arousal predicts semen parameters for masturbatory ejaculates. Physiology and Behavior, 76, 685-689.
91. Preston, B. T., Stevenson, I. R., Pemberton, J. M., & Wilson, K. (2001). Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion. Nature, 409, 681-682.
92. Price, J. H., & Miller, P. A. (1984). Sexual fantasies of Black and of White college students. Psychological Reports, 54, 1007-1014.
93. Prins, G. S., & Zaneveld, L. J. (1979). Distribution of spermatozoa in the rabbit vas deferens. Biology of Reproduction, 21, 181-185.
94. Prins, G. S., & Zaneveld, L. J. (1980). Radiographic study of fluid transport in the rabbit vas deferens during sexual rest and after sexual activity. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 58, 311-319.
95. Read, M. D., & Schnieden, H. (1978). Variations in sperm count in oligozoospermic or asthenozoospermic patients. Andrologia, 10, 52-55.
96. Rice, W. R. (1996). Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature, 381, 232-234.
97. Rokach, A. (1990). Content analysis of sexual fantasies of males and females. Journal of Psychology, 124, 427-436.
98. Sauer, M. V., Zeffer, K. B., Buster, J. E., & Sokol, R. Z. (1988). Effect of abstinence on sperm motility in normal men. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 158, 604-607.
99. Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allik, J., Ault, L., Austers, I., & Bennett, K. L. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 85-104.
100. Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Are men really more oriented toward short-term mating than women?: A critical review of theory and research. Psychology, Evolution, and Gender, 3, 211-239.
101. Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., Duntley, J., Tooke, W., & Buss, D. M. (2001). The desire for sexual variety as a tool for understanding basic human mating strategies. Personal Relationships, 8, 425-455.
102. Schwartz, D., Laplanche, A., Jouannet, P., & David, G. (1979). Within-subject variability of human semen in regard to sperm count, volume, total number of spermatozoa and length of abstinence. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 57, 391-395.
103. Shackelford, T. K. (2003). Preventing, correcting, and anticipating female infidelity: Three adaptive problems of sperm competition. Evolution and Cognition, 9, 90-96.
104. Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., LaMunyon, C. W., Quintus, B. J., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2004). Sex differences in sexual psychology produce sex similar preferences for a short-term mate. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 405-412.
105. Shackelford, T. K., & LeBlanc, G. J. (2001). Sperm competition in insects, birds, and humans: Insights from a comparative evolutionary perspective. Evolution and Cognition, 7, 194-202.
106. Shackelford, T. K., LeBlanc, G. J., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Bleske-Rechek, A. L., Euler, H. A., & Hoier, S. (2002). Psychological adaptation to human sperm competition. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 123-138.
107. Shackelford, T. K., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Le-Blanc, G. J., Bleske, A. L., Euler, H. A., & Hoier, S. (2000). Female coital orgasm and male attractiveness. Human Nature, 11, 299-306.
108. Shapiro, D. Y., Marconato, A., & Yoshikawa, T. (1994). Sperm economy in a coral reef fish, Thalassoma bifasciatum. Ecology, 75, 1334-1344.
109. Short, R. V. (1979). Sexual selection and its component parts, somatic and genital selection as illus trated by man and the great apes. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 9, 131-158.
110. Short, R. V. (1981). Sexual selection in man and the great apes. In C. E. Graham (Ed.), Reproductive biology of the great apes (pp. 319-341). New York: Academic Press.
111. Short, R. V. (1998). Review of Human sperm competition: Copulation, masturbation and infidelity, by R. R. Baker and M. A. Bellis. European Sociobiology Society Newsletter, 47, 20-23.
112. Simmons, L. W. (2001). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
113. Smith, R. L. (1984). Human sperm competition. In R. L. Smith (Ed.), Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems (pp. 601-660). New York: Academic Press.
114. Sofikitis, N. V., & Miyagawa, I. (1993). Endocrino-logical, biophysical, and biochemical parameters of semen collected via masturbation versus sexual intercourse. Journal of Andrology, 14, 366-373.
115. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
116. Talese, G. (1981). Thy neighbor's wife. New York: Ballantine Books.
117. Thornhill, R. (1983). Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. American Naturalist, 122, 765-788.
118. Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., & Comer, R. (1995). Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1601-1615.
119. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 139-179). London: Aldine.
120. van Roijen, J. H., Slob, A. K., Gianotten, W. L., Dohle, G. R., vander Zon, A. T. M., Vreeburg, T. M., & Weber, R. F. A. (1996). Sexual arousal and the quality of semen produced by masturbation. Human Reproduction, 11, 147-151.
121. Waage, J. K. (1979, March 2). Dual function of the damselfly penis: Sperm removal and transfer. Science, 203, 916-918.
122. Wedell, N., Gage, M. J. G., & Parker, G. A. (2002). Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 313-320.
123. Wildt, D. E., Bush, M., Goodrowe, K. L., Packer, C., Pusey, A. E., Brown, J. L., et al. (1987). Reproductive and genetic consequences of founding isolated lion populations. Nature, 329, 328-331.
124. Wilson, G. D. (1987). Male-female differences in sexual activity, enjoyment and fantasies. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 125-127.
125. Wilson, G. D. (1997). Gender differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 27-31.
126. Wilson, G. D., & Lang, R. J. (1981). Sex differences in sexual fantasy patterns. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 343-346.
127. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The man who mistook his wife for a chattel. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 19-136). New York: Oxford University Press.
128. Wyckoff, G. J., Wang, W., & Wu, C. (2000). Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man. Nature, 403, 304-308.
129. Yamamoto, Y., Sofikitis, N., Mio, Y., & Miyagawa, I. (2000). Influence of sexual stimulation on sperm parameters in semen samples collected via masturbation from normozoospermic men or cryptozoospermic men participating in an assisted reproduction programme. Andrologia, 32, 131-138.
130. Zavos, P. M. (1985). Seminal parameters of ejaculates collected from oligospermic and normospermic patients via masturbation and at intercourse with the use of a Silastic seminal fluid collection device. Fertility and Sterility, 44, 517-520.
131. Zavos, P. M. (1988). Seminal parameters of ejaculates collected at intercourse with the use of a seminal collection device with different levels of precoital stimulation. Journal of Andrology, 9, P36.
132. Zavos, P. M., & Goodpasture, J. C. (1989). Clinical improvements of specific seminal deficiencies via intercourse with a seminal collection device versus masturbation. Fertility and Sterility, 51, 190-193.
133. Zavos, P. M., Kofinas, G. D., Sofikitis, N. V., Zarmakoupis, P. N., & Miyagawa, I. (1994). Differences in seminal parameters in specimens collected via intercourse and incomplete intercourse (coitus interruptus). Fertility and Sterility, 61, 1174-1176.