The construct validity of the Stanford-Binet 5 measures of working memory

Assessment

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 338-346

  Pomplun, Mark ^a,b   Custer, Michael ^a  

^a Riverside Publishing ^*  (United States)

^b Riverside Publishing   (United States)

Author keywords

Construct validity; Intelligence; Stanford Binet 5; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; APTITUDE TEST; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOMETRY; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHORT TERM MEMORY; STANFORD-BINET INTELLIGENCE SCALE; STATISTICS; WECHSLER INTELLIGENCE SCALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; APTITUDE TESTS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STANFORD-BINET TEST; WECHSLER SCALES;

EID: 25444509285     PISSN: 10731911     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1073191105276796     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arthur, G. (1947). A point scale of performance tests. New York: Psychological Corporation.
2. Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999). The multi-component model. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28-61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
3. Bracken, B. A., & McCallum, R. S. (1998). Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
4. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
6. Embretson, S. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179-197.
7. Gevins, A., & Smith, A. E. (2000). Neurophysiological measures of working memory and individual differences in cognitive ability and cognitive style. Cerebral Cortex, 10(9), 829-839.
8. Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1992). Working memory and the mind. Scientific American, 267, 110-117.
9. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1977). Clinical evaluation of young children with the McCarthy Scales. New York: Grune & Stratton.
10. Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J. G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems, Psychological Review, 92, 109-129.
11. Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389-433.
12. Linacre, J. M. (2002). Winsteps: Rasch-Model computer program. Chicago: Author.
13. Marshalek, B., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, R. E. (1983). The complexity continuum in the radix and hierarchical models of intelligence. Intelligence, 7, 102-127.
14. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuo-spatial WM, executive functioning and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 621-640.
15. Psychological Corporation. (2001). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: Author.
16. Ramsey, M. C., & Reynolds, C. R. (1995). Separate digits tests: A brief history, a literature review, and a reexamination of the factor structure of the Test of Memory and Learning. Neuropsychology Review, 5, 151-171.
17. Richardson, J. T. E. (1996). Evolving issues in working memory. In J. T. E. Richardson, R. Engle, L. Hasher, R. Logie, E. Stoltzfus, & R. Zacks (Eds.), Working memory and human cognition (pp. 120-154). New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Reid, D. K., Hresko, W. P., & Swanson, H. L. (1996). Cognitive approaches to learning disabilities. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
19. Roid, G. H. (2003a). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition, examiner manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
20. Roid, G. H. (2003b). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition, technical manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
21. Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1999). Models of Working Memory: An Introduction. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 1-28). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
22. Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60, 973-980.
23. Swanson, H. L., & Sachse-Lee, C. (2001). A subgroup analysis of working memory in children with reading disabilities: Domain-general or domain-specific deficiency? Journal of Learning Disabilties, 34(3), 249-263.
24. Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
25. Wechsler, D. (1989). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
26. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
27. Wilson, K. M., & Swanson, H. L. (2001). Are mathematics disabilities due to a domain-general or a domain-specific working memory deficit? Journal of Learning Disabilties, 34(3), 237-248.
28. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001) Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside.