Intimate partner violence among Canadian women with activity limitations

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 59, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 834-839

  Cohen, Marsha M ^a,b   Forte, Tonia ^a   Du Mont, Janice ^a   Hyman, Ilene ^a,b   Romans, Sarah ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENDER RELATIONS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; VIOLENCE; WOMENS STATUS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; CANADA; EDUCATION; EMOTIONAL DISORDER; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MARRIAGE; PARTNER VIOLENCE; PREVALENCE; REVIEW; SEXUAL ABUSE; SOCIAL STATUS;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CANADA; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MARITAL STATUS; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; SEX OFFENSES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SPOUSE ABUSE;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 25444501795     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2004.022467     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Fischbach RL, Herbert B. Domestic violence and mental health: correlates and conundrums within and across cultures. Soc Sci Med 1997;45:1161-76.
2. McCauley J, Kern DE, Kolodner K, et al. Relation of low-severity violence to women's health. J Gen Intern Med 1998;13:687-91.
3. Coker AL, Smith PH, Bethea L, et al. Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:451-7.
4. Krantz G, Ostergren PO. The association between violence victimisation and common symptoms in Swedish women. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:815-21.
5. Nosek MA, Howland CA, Young ME. Abuse of women with disabilities: policy implications. J Disabil Polic Stud 1997;8:157-75.
6. Andrews AB, Veronen LJ. Sexual assault and people with disabilities. J Soc Work Hum Sexuality 1993;8:137-59.
7. Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, et al. The international classification of functioning, disability and health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:565-71.
8. Norris DA, Paton DG. Canada's general social survey: five years of experiences. Survey Methodology 1991;17:227-40.
9. Johnson H, Bunge VP. Prevalence and consequences of spousal assault in Canada. Can J Criminol 2001;43:27-45.
10. Straus M. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the conflict tactics scales. J Marriage Fam 1979;41:75-88.
11. Straus MA, Harriby SL, Boney-McCoy S, et al. The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2). J Fam Issues 1996;17:283-316.
12. Statistics Canada. 1999 General social survey, cycle 13. Victimization: public use microdata file documentation and user's guide. Ottawa: Minister of Industry, 2000.
13. Nosek MA, Hughes RB, Taylor HB, et al. Violence against women with disabilities: the role of physicians in filling the treatment gap. In: Welner SL, Haseltine F, eds. Welner's guide to the care of women with disabilities. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2004:333-45.
14. Chenoweth L. Violence and women with disabilities. Violence Against Women 1996;22:391-411.
15. Chang JC, Martin SL, Morocco KE, et al. Helping women with disabilities and domestic violence: strategies, limitations, and challenges of domestic violence programs and services. J Womens Health 2003;12:699-708.
16. Nosek MA, Foley CC, Hughes RB, et al. Vulnerabilities for abuse among women with disabilities. Sex Disabil 2001;19:177-89.
17. McFarlane J, Hughes RB, Nosek MA, et al. Abuse assessment screen-disability (AAS-D): measuring frequency, type, and perpetrator of abuse toward women with physical disabilities. J Women Health Gen-B 2001;10:861-6.