Differential response of Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq ex DC) JD Sauer to glyphosate

Pest Management Science

Volumn 61, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 936-950

  Zelaya, Ian A ^a,b   Owen, Micheal D K ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b 2104 Agronomy Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Asexual propagation; Baseline sensitivity monitoring; Herbicide resistance; Non destructive assay; Recurrent selection; Shikimic acid

Indexed keywords

DRUG DERIVATIVE; GLYCINE; GLYPHOSATE; HERBICIDE;

GLYPHOSATE; PESTICIDE RESISTANCE; RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT;

AMARANTHUS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG RESISTANCE; GENETIC SELECTION; SEEDLING;

AMARANTHUS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG RESISTANCE; GLYCINE; HERBICIDES; SEEDLING; SELECTION (GENETICS);

MIDWEST; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

AMARANTHUS; AMARANTHUS TUBERCULATUS; TUBERCULATUS;

EID: 25444494717     PISSN: 1526498X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ps.1074     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (69)

1. Shaner DL, The impact of glyphosate-tolerant crops on the use of other herbicides and on resistance management. Pest Manag Sci 56:320-326 (2000).
2. Reddy KN, Glyphosate-resistant soybean as a weed management tool: opportunities and challenges. Weed Biol Manag 1:193-202 (2001s).
3. Owen MDK and Zelaya IA, Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest Manag Sci 61:301-311 (2005).
4. Anonymous, Agricultural chemical use database. National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), USDA, http://www.pest-management.info/nass/ (2005).
5. Watkinson AR, Freckleton RP, Robinson RA and Sutherland WJ, Predictions of biodiversity response to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Science (Washington) 289:1554-1557 (2000).
6. Freckleton RP, Stephens PA, Sutherland WJ and Watkinson AR, Amelioration of biodiversity impacts of genetically modified crops: predicting transient versus long-term effects. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:325-331 (2004).
7. Heard MS, Hawes C, Champion GT, Clark SJ, Firbank LG, Haughton AJ, Parish AM, Perry JN, Rothery P, Roy DB, Scott RJ, Skellern MP, Squire GR and Hill MO, Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. II Effects on individual species. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:1833-1846 (2003).
8. Hilgenfeld KL, Martin AR, Mortensen DA and Mason SC, Weed management in a glyphosate -resistant soybean system: weed species shifts. Weed Technol 18:284-291 (2004).
9. Kwon YW, Kim DS and Yim KO, Herbicide-resistant genetically modified crops: assessment and management of gene flow. Weed Biol Manag 1:96-107 (2001).
10. Meagher TR, Belanger FC and Day PR, Using empirical data to model transgene dispersal. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:1157-1162 (2003).
11. Haygood R, Ives AR and Andow DA, Consequences of recurrent gene flow from crops to wild relatives. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:1879-1886 (2003).
12. Stewart CN, Halfhill MD and Warwick SI, Genetic modification: transgene introgression from genetically modified crops to their wild relatives. Nat Rev Genet 4:806-817 (2003).
13. DeGennaro FP and Weller SC, Differential susceptibility of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) biotypes to glyphosate. Weed Sci 32:472-476 (1984).
14. Hartzler RG and Battles BA, Reduced fitness of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) surviving glyphosate. Weed Technol 15:492-496 (2001).
15. Patzoldt WL, Tranel PJ and Hager AG, Variable herbicide responses among Illinois waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis and A tuberculatus) populations. Crop Prot 21:707-712 (2002).
16. Westwood JH and Weller SC, Cellular mechanisms influence differential glyphosate sensitivity in field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) biotypes. Weed Sci 45:2-11 (1997).
17. Norsworthy JK, Burgos NR and Oliver LR, Differences in weed tolerance to glyphosate involve different mechanisms. Weed Technol 15:725-731 (2001).
18. Heap I, The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. http://www.weedscience.com/ (2005).
19. Baerson SR, Rodriguez DJ, Tran M, Feng Y, Biest NA and Dill GM, Glyphosate-resistant goosegrass. Identification of a mutation in the target enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase. Plant Physiol 129:1265-1275 (2002).
20. Lorraine-Colwill DF, Powles SB, Hawkes TR, Hollinshead PH, Warner SAJ and Preston C, Investigations into the mechanism of glyphosate resistance in Lolium rigidum. Pestic Biochem Physiol 74:62-72 (2003).
21. Feng PCC, Tran M, Chiu T, Sammons RD, Heck GR and CaJacob CA, Investigations into glyphosate-resistant horse-weed (Conyza canadensis): retention, uptake, translocation, and metabolism. Weed Sci 52:498-505 (2004).
22. Baylis AD, Why glyphosate is a global herbicide: strengths, weaknesses and prospects. Pest Manag Sci 56:299-308 (2000).
23. McGregor RL, Barkley TM, Baker WT, Brooks RE, Churchill SP, Kaul RB, Kolstad OA, Sutherland DM, Van Bruggen T, Weedon RR and Wilson JS, Atlas of the flora of the great plains, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, pp 70-72 (1977).
24. Mayo CM, Horak MJ, Peterson DE and Boyer JE, Differential control of four Amaranthus species by six postemergence herbicides in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 9:141-147 (1995).
25. Foes MJ, Liu L, Tranel PJ, Wax LM and Stoller EW, A biotype of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistant to triazine and ALS herbicides. Weed Sci 46:514-520 (1998).
26. Patzoldt WL, Tranel PJ and Hagerb AG, A waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) biotype with multiple resistance across three herbicide sites of action. Weed Sci 53:30-36 (2005).
27. Trucco F, Jeschke MR, Rayburn AL and Tranel PJ, Promiscuity in weedy amaranths: high frequency of female tall waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) x smooth pigweed (A hybridus) hybridization under field conditions. Weed Sci 53:46-54 (2005).
28. Zelaya IA and Owen MDK, Amaranthus tuberculatus (Mq ex DC) JD Sauer: potential for selection of glyphosate resistance, in 13th Australian Weeds Conference, ed by Spafford-Jacob H, Dodd J and Moore JH, Shannon Books, Perth, Australia, pp 630-633 (2002).
29. Smeda RJ and Schuster CL, Differential sensitivity to glyphosate among biotypes of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis Sauer), in 13th Australian Weeds Conference, ed by Spafford-Jacob H, Dodd J and Moore JH, Shannon Books, Perth, Australia, pp 642-644 (2002).
30. Hinz JRR and Owen MDK, Acetolactate synthase resistance in a common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) population. Weed Technol 11:13-18 (1997).
31. Anderson DD, Roeth FW and Martin AR, Occurrence and control of triazine-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in field corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 10:570-575 (1996).
32. Anonymous, Crop Protection Reference, C & P Press, Inc, New York, NY, pp 1836-1855 (2004).
33. Robertson JL, Preisler HK, Ng SS, Hinkle LA and Gelernter WD, Natural variation: a complicating factor in bioassays with chemical and microbial pesticides. J Econ Entomol 88:1-10 (1995).
34. Schaub L, Sardy S and Capkun G, Natural variation in baseline data: when do we call a new sample 'resistant'? Pest Manag Sci 58:959-963 (2002).
35. Brenner DM and Widrlechner MP, Amaranthus seed regeneration in plastic tents in greenhouses. Plant Genet Resour Newsl 116:1-4 (1998).
36. Hallauer AR, Compendium of recurrent selection methods and their application. Crit Rev Plant Sci 3:1-33 (1985).
37. Boguski MS, Lowe TM and Tolstoshev CM, dbEST - database for "expressed sequence tags". Nat Genet 4:332-333 (1993).
38. Lee Y, Tsai J, Sunkara S, Karamycheva S, Pertea G, Sultana R, Antonescu V, Chan A, Cheung F and Quackenbush J, The TIGR Gene Indices: clustering and assembling EST and known genes and integration with eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D71-D74 (2005).
39. Anonymous, TIGR database: The Institute for Genomic Research, http://www.tigr.org/ (2005).
40. Tatusova TA and Madden TL, Blast 2 sequences - a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences. FEMS Microbiol Lett 174:247-250 (1999).
41. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhaǹg J, Zhang Z, Miller W and Lipman DJ, Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389-3402 (1997).
42. SAS, SAS procedures guide, version 8, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, p 3884 (2000).
43. Huynh H and Feldt LS, Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurements designs have exact F-distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 65:1582-1589 (1970).
44. Schabenberger O, Tharp BE, Kells JJ and Penner D, Statistical tests for hormesis and effective dosages in herbicide dose response. Agron J 91:713-721 (1999).
45. Brain P and Cousens R, An equation to describe dose responses where there is stimulation of growth at low doses. Weed Res 29:93-96 (1989).
46. Seefeldt SS, Jensen JE and Fuerst EP, Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol 9:218-227 (1995).
47. Collett D, Modelling binary data, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p 408 (2002).
48. Paterson EA, Shenton ZL and Straszewski AE, Establishment of the baseline sensitivity and monitoring response of Papaver rhoeas populations to florasulam. Pest Manag Sci 58:964-966 (2002).
49. Moulton JK, Pepper DA, Jansson RK and Dennehy TJ, Proactive management of beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance to tebufenozide and methoxyfenozide: baseline monitoring, risk assessment, and isolation of resistance. J Econ Entomol 95:414-424 (2002).
50. Jutsum AR, Heaney SP, Perrin BM and Wege PJ, Pesticide resistance: assessment of risk and the development and implementation of effective management strategies. Pestic Sci 54:435-446 (1998).
51. Murray MJ, The genetics of sex determination in the family Amaranthaceae. Genetics 25:409-431 (1940).
52. Pratt BD and Clark LG, Amaranthus rudis and A tuberculatus - one species or two? J Torrey Bot Soc 128:282-296 (2001).
53. Menalled FD, Liebman M and Buhler DD, Impact of composted swine manure and tillage on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) competition with soybean. Weed Sci 52:605-613 (2004).
54. Bierzychudek P and Eckhart V, Spatial segregation of the sexes of dioecious plants. Am Nat 132:34-43 (1988).
55. Bram MR and Quinn JA, Sex expression, sex-specific traits, and the effects of salinity on growth and reproduction of Amaranthus cannabinus (Amaranthaceae), a dioecious annual. Am J Bot 87:1609-1618 (2000).
56. Tranel PJ, Patzoldt WL and Volenberg DS, Waterhemp's response to glyphosate selection. Proc North Cent Weed Sci Soc Abstr 59:83 (2004).
57. Chan KF and Sun M, Genetic diversity and relationships detected by isozyme and RAPD analysis of crop and wild species of Amaranthus. Theor Appl Genet 95:865-873 (1997).
58. Sun M, Chen H and Leung FC, Low-Cot DNA sequences for fingerprinting analysis of germplasm diversity and relationships in Amaranthus. Theor Appl Genet 99:464-472 (1999).
59. Lorraine-Colwill DF, Powles SB, Hawkes TR and Preston C, Inheritance of evolved glyphosate resistance in Lolium rigidum (Gaud). Theor Appl Genet 102:545-550 (2001).
60. Zelaya IA, Owen MDK and VanGessel MJ, Inheritance of evolved glyphosate resistance in Conyza canadensis (L) Cronq. Theor Appl Genet 110:58-70 (2004).
61. Ng CH, Wickneswary R, Salmijah S, Teng YT and Ismail BS, Glyphosate resistance in Eleusine indica (L) Gaertn from different origins and polymerase chain reaction amplification of specific alleles. Aust J Agric Res 55:407-414 (2004).
62. Ng CH, Wickneswari R, Salmijah S, Teng YT and Ismail BS, Gene polymorphisms in glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible biotypes of Eleusine indica from Malaysia. Weed Res 43:108-115 (2003).
63. Chun PT and Hickok LG, Inheritance of two mutations conferring glyphosate tolerance in the fern Ceratopteris richardii. Can J Bot 70:1097-1099 (1992).
64. Racchi ML, Stefanini F, Camussi A and Forlani G, Inheritance of glyphosate tolerance among maize somaclones. Maydica 42:275-280 (1997).
65. Duncan CN and Weller SC, Heritability of glyphosate susceptibility among biotypes of field bindweed. J Hered 78:257-260 (1987).
66. Forlani G, Parisi B and Nielsen E, 5-enol-Pyruvyl-shikimate-3-phosphate synthase from Zea mays cultured cells: purification and properties. Plant Physiol 105:1107-1114 (1994).
67. Forlani G, Nielsen E and Racchi ML, A glyphosate-resistant 5-enol-pyruvyl-shikimate-3-phosphate synthase confers tolerance to a maize cell line. Plant Sci 85:9-15 (1992).
68. Padgette SR, Re DB, Gasser CS, Eichholtz DA, Frazier RB, Hironaka CM, Levine EB, Shah DM, Fraley RT and Kishore GM, Site-directed mutagenesis of a conserved region of the 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase active site. J Biol Chem 266:22 364-22 369 (1991).
69. Neve P, Diggle AJ, Smith FP and Powles SB, Simulating evolution of glyphosate resistance in Lolium rigidum I: population biology of a rare resistance trait. Weed Res 43:404-417 (2003).