Developing a measure of wealth for primary student families in a developing country: Comparison of two methods of psychometric calibration

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 31, Issue 2-3, 2005, Pages 192-206

  Griffin, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25444493941     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allen L. Oshagan & H. The UCLA loneliness scale: Invariance of social structural characteristics Personality and Individual Differences 19 2 1995 185-195
2. Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories Psychometrika 43 1978 561-573
3. Andrich D. Rasch models for measurement: Quantitative applications in the social sciences 1988 Sage London
4. Babcock R.L. Laguna K.D. Roesch S.C. A comparison of the factor structure of processing speed for younger and older adults: Testing the assumption of measurement equivalence across age groups Psychology and Aging 12 2 1997 268-276
5. Bartholomew D.J. & Knott M. Latent variable models and factor analysis 1999 Arnold London
6. Bentler P.M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models Psychometrika 107 2 1990 238-246
7. Bentler P.M. & Bonnet D.G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures Psychological Bulletin 88 1980 588-606
8. Behrman J.R. & Deolalikar A.B. The intrahousehold demand for nutrients in rural south India: Individual estimates, fixed effects, and permanent income Journal of Human Resources 25 4 1990 665-696
9. Bollen K.A. Structural equations with latent variables 1989 Wiley New York
10. Bollen KA Glanville J.L. & Stecklov G. Economic status proxies in studies of fertility in developing countries: Does the measure matter? Measure: Measure Evaluation WP01-38 2001
11. Bollen K.A. Glanville J.L. & Stecklov G. Economic status proxies in studies of fertility in developing countries: Does the measure matter? Population Studies - A Journal of Demography 56 2002 81-96
12. Browne M.W. & Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.) Testing structural equation models 1993 Sage Beverly Hills, CA 136-162
13. Campbell N.R. An account of the principles of measurement and calculation 1928 Longman, Green and Co. London
14. Deaton A. Understanding consumption 1992 Oxford University Press New York
15. Friedman M. A theory of the consumption function 1957 Princeton University Press Princeton
16. Washington Filmer D. 7amp; Pritchett L. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data - or tears: An application to educational enrolments in States of India World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1994 1998a
17. Washington Filmer D. & Pritchett L. The effect of household wealth on educational attainment around the world: Demographic and health survey evidence World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1980 1998b
18. Filmer D. & Pritchett L. The effect of household wealth on educational attainment: Evidence from 35 countries Population and Development Review 25 1 1999 85-120
19. Filmer D. & Pritchett L. Estimating wealth effects without income or expenditure data - or tears: Educational enrolment in India Demography 38 2001 115-132
20. Glockner-Rist A. & Hoijyink H. The best of both worlds: Factor analysis of dichotomous data using item response theory and structural equation modelling Structural Equation Modelling 10 4 2003 544-565
21. Griffin P. Vietnam primary school monitoring report Mimeographed report 1999 World Bank in Vietnam
22. Griffin P. Pupil test development and calibration In C. Shaw & T.T. Mai (Eds.) Vietnam reading and mathematics study. Volume 3: Methodology 2004 Human Development Sector Reports East Asia and Pacific Region, The World Bank Washington, DC 97-154
23. Griffin P. & Tran K. The World Bank project report on primary schools monitoring 2000 Ministry of Education and Training Ha Noi
24. Guttman L. A basis for scaling qualitative data American Sociological Review 9 1944 139-150
25. Joreskog K.G. & Sorbom D. LISREL 7 User's Reference Guide 1989 Scientific Software, Inc. Chicago
26. Joreskog K.G. Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations Psychometrika 36 1971 409-426
27. Joreskog K.G. Testing structural equation models In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.) Testing structural equation models 1993 Sage Newbury Park, CA 294-316
28. Labouvie E.W. Identity versus equivalence of psychological measures and constructs In L.W. Poon (Ed.) Aging in the 1980s: Psychological issues 1980 American Psychological Association Washington DC 493-502
29. Little T. Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues Multivariate Behavioral Research 32 1 1997 53-76
30. Luce R.D. & Tukey J.W. Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1 1964 1-27
31. Mallenbergh G.J. Generalized linear item response modelling Psychological Bulletin 115 1994 302-307
32. Marsh H.W. Confirmatory factor analysis models of factorial invariance: A multifaceted approach Structural Equation Modelling 1 1 1994 5-36
33. Marsh H.W. & Grayson D. Longitudinal stability of latent means and individual differences: A unified approach Structural Equation Modelling 1 2 1994 317-359
34. Marsh H.W. Balla J.R. & McDonald R.P. Goodness of fit in CFM: The effect of sample size Psychological Bulletin 103 1988 391-410
35. Masters G.N. Measurement models for ordered response categories In R. Langeheine & J. Rost (Eds.) Latent trait and latent class models 1988 Plenum New York
36. Masters G.N. & Keeves J.P. Advances in measurement in educational research and assessment 1999 Pergamon New York
37. McDonald R. & Marsh H.W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit Psychological Bulletin 107 2 1990 247-255
38. Montgomery M.R. Gragnolati M. Burke K.A. & Parades E. Measuring living standards with proxy variables Demography. 37 2000 155-174
39. Taris T.W. Bok I.A. & Meijer Z.Y. Assessing stability and change of psychometric properties of multi-item concepts across different situations: A general approach Journal of Psychology 132 3 1998 301-316
40. Tucker L.R. & Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis Psychometrika 38 1973 1-10
41. UNICEF End of decade assessment - Multiple indicator cluster surveys Available: 2004
42. Widerman K.F. & Reise S.P. Exploring measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in a substantive use domain In K.J. Bryant M. Wyndal & S.G. West (Eds.) The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research 1997 American Psychological Association Washington DC 281-324
43. Wright B.D. & Masters G.N. Rating scale analysis 1982 MESA Press Chicago
44. Wright B.D. & Stone M.H. Best test design 1979 MESA Press Chicago
45. Wu M.L. & Adams R.J. ConQuest: Multi-aspect test software [computer program] 2004 Australian Council for Educational Research Camberwell