Occupational contact dermatitis among the traditional 'tie and dye' cottage industry in Western Rajasthan

Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 329-332

  Singhi, M K ^a,b   Menghani, P R ^a   Gupta, L K ^a   Kachhawa, Dilip ^a   Bansal, Mohit ^a  

^a DR S N MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^b NONE   (India)

Author keywords

Contact dermatitis; Occupational dermatoses; Tie and dye industry

Indexed keywords

1 NAPHTHOL; AZO DYE; DYE; SULFUR DERIVATIVE;

ADOLESCENT; AGED; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOREARM; HAND; HUMAN; INDIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL ECZEMA; PATCH TEST; PREVALENCE; SKIN DEFECT; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; WORKER;

EID: 25444487526     PISSN: 03786323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.16783     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Farner LM. Rehabilitation in industrial dermatosis. Arch Dermatol 1954;69:428-34.
2. th edn. London: Hodder and Stoughton; 1978.
3. Calnan CD. The climate of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1964;44:34.
4. Walker RB, Smith PD, Maibeen MI. Genetic factors in human allergic contact dermatitis. Int Arch Allergy 1967;32:453-62.
5. Battu RV, Pasricha JS. Occupational dermatitis in some selected industries in India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1985;51:26-30.
6. Singh GB. Toxicity of dyes with special reference to benzathrone. Indian J Indust Med 1970;16:122-9.
7. Mathur NK. Contact dermatitis caused by industrial agents. In: Pasricha JS, Sethi NC, editors. Contact dermatitis in India. Mumbai: Lyka Lab Publishers; 1981. p. 50.
8. nd edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990. p. 1-25.
9. Wilkinson DS, Fregert S, Magnusson B. Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1970;50:287-92.