-
1
-
-
20244375941
-
Does anybody read "evidence-based" articles?
-
Loke YK & Derry S, Does anybody read "evidence-based" articles? BMC Med Res Methodol, 2003: 31: 14
-
(2003)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.31
, pp. 14
-
-
Loke, Y.K.1
Derry, S.2
-
2
-
-
0027599918
-
Critical appraisal of review articles
-
Hutchison BG, Critical appraisal of review articles. Can Fam Physician, 1993: 39: 1097-1.
-
(1993)
Can Fam Physician
, vol.39
, pp. 1097-1101
-
-
Hutchison, B.G.1
-
3
-
-
0037024295
-
Comparison of review articles published in peer review and throwaway Journals
-
Rochon PA, Bero LA, Bay AM & al, Comparison of review articles published in peer review and throwaway Journals. JAMA, 2002: 5: 2853-6.
-
(2002)
JAMA
, vol.5
, pp. 2853-2856
-
-
Rochon, P.A.1
Bero, L.A.2
Bay, A.M.3
-
4
-
-
0035856123
-
Use of systematic reviews in clinical practice guidelines: Case study of smoking cessation
-
Silagy CA, Stead LF & Lancaster T, Use of systematic reviews in clinical practice guidelines: case study of smoking cessation. BMJ, 2001: 13: 833-6.
-
(2001)
BMJ
, vol.13
, pp. 833-836
-
-
Silagy, C.A.1
Stead, L.F.2
Lancaster, T.3
-
7
-
-
0033593076
-
The medical review article revisited: Has the science improved?
-
McAlister FA, Clark HD, van Walraven C & al, The medical review article revisited: has the science improved? Ann Intern Med, 1999: 131: 947-951.
-
(1999)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.131
, pp. 947-951
-
-
McAlister, F.A.1
Clark, H.D.2
Van Walraven, C.3
-
8
-
-
3142567881
-
Systematic reviews: A cross sectional study of location and citation counts
-
Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D & Haynes RB, Systematic reviews: a cross sectional study of location and citation counts. BMC Med, 2003: 24: 2.
-
(2003)
BMC Med
, vol.24
, pp. 2
-
-
Montori, V.M.1
Wilczynski, N.L.2
Morgan, D.3
Haynes, R.B.4
-
9
-
-
0035856194
-
Quality of Cochrane reviews: Assessment of sample from 1998
-
Olsen O, Middleton P, Gotzsche PC & al, Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998. BMJ, 2001: 323: 829-32.
-
(2001)
BMJ
, vol.323
, pp. 829-832
-
-
Olsen, O.1
Middleton, P.2
Gotzsche, P.C.3
-
10
-
-
84861273702
-
-
The James Lind Library WWW.Jameslindlibrary.org
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
0037240936
-
How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine
-
Linde K & Willich SN, How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine. J R Soc Med, 2003: 96: 17-22.
-
(2003)
J R Soc Med
, vol.96
, pp. 17-22
-
-
Linde, K.1
Willich, S.N.2
-
12
-
-
0041742496
-
Methodologic requirements for assessing surgical procedures in current medical literature
-
Jimenez RE, Gutierrez AR & Benitez IM, Methodologic requirements for assessing surgical procedures in current medical literature. World J Surg, 2003: 27: 229-33.
-
(2003)
World J Surg
, vol.27
, pp. 229-233
-
-
Jimenez, R.E.1
Gutierrez, A.R.2
Benitez, I.M.3
-
13
-
-
0027384557
-
An analysis of review articles published in primary care journals
-
Silagy CA, An analysis of review articles published in primary care journals. Fam Pract, 1993: 10: 337-41.
-
(1993)
Fam Pract
, vol.10
, pp. 337-341
-
-
Silagy, C.A.1
-
14
-
-
0037024264
-
Measuring the quality of editorial peer review
-
Jefferson T, Wager E & Davidoff F, Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. JAMA, 2002: 5: 2786-9.
-
(2002)
JAMA
, vol.5
, pp. 2786-2789
-
-
Jefferson, T.1
Wager, E.2
Davidoff, F.3
|