메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 144, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 558-560

Review articles - To write, to read or to throw away?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEDICAL LITERATURE; PUBLICATION; READING; REVIEW; WRITING; ARTICLE; HUMAN; LITERATURE;

EID: 25444487521     PISSN: 00177768     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (2)

References (17)
  • 1
    • 20244375941 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does anybody read "evidence-based" articles?
    • Loke YK & Derry S, Does anybody read "evidence-based" articles? BMC Med Res Methodol, 2003: 31: 14
    • (2003) BMC Med Res Methodol , vol.31 , pp. 14
    • Loke, Y.K.1    Derry, S.2
  • 2
    • 0027599918 scopus 로고
    • Critical appraisal of review articles
    • Hutchison BG, Critical appraisal of review articles. Can Fam Physician, 1993: 39: 1097-1.
    • (1993) Can Fam Physician , vol.39 , pp. 1097-1101
    • Hutchison, B.G.1
  • 3
    • 0037024295 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of review articles published in peer review and throwaway Journals
    • Rochon PA, Bero LA, Bay AM & al, Comparison of review articles published in peer review and throwaway Journals. JAMA, 2002: 5: 2853-6.
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.5 , pp. 2853-2856
    • Rochon, P.A.1    Bero, L.A.2    Bay, A.M.3
  • 4
    • 0035856123 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Use of systematic reviews in clinical practice guidelines: Case study of smoking cessation
    • Silagy CA, Stead LF & Lancaster T, Use of systematic reviews in clinical practice guidelines: case study of smoking cessation. BMJ, 2001: 13: 833-6.
    • (2001) BMJ , vol.13 , pp. 833-836
    • Silagy, C.A.1    Stead, L.F.2    Lancaster, T.3
  • 7
    • 0033593076 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The medical review article revisited: Has the science improved?
    • McAlister FA, Clark HD, van Walraven C & al, The medical review article revisited: has the science improved? Ann Intern Med, 1999: 131: 947-951.
    • (1999) Ann Intern Med , vol.131 , pp. 947-951
    • McAlister, F.A.1    Clark, H.D.2    Van Walraven, C.3
  • 8
    • 3142567881 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic reviews: A cross sectional study of location and citation counts
    • Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D & Haynes RB, Systematic reviews: a cross sectional study of location and citation counts. BMC Med, 2003: 24: 2.
    • (2003) BMC Med , vol.24 , pp. 2
    • Montori, V.M.1    Wilczynski, N.L.2    Morgan, D.3    Haynes, R.B.4
  • 9
    • 0035856194 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality of Cochrane reviews: Assessment of sample from 1998
    • Olsen O, Middleton P, Gotzsche PC & al, Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998. BMJ, 2001: 323: 829-32.
    • (2001) BMJ , vol.323 , pp. 829-832
    • Olsen, O.1    Middleton, P.2    Gotzsche, P.C.3
  • 10
    • 84861273702 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The James Lind Library WWW.Jameslindlibrary.org
  • 11
    • 0037240936 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine
    • Linde K & Willich SN, How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine. J R Soc Med, 2003: 96: 17-22.
    • (2003) J R Soc Med , vol.96 , pp. 17-22
    • Linde, K.1    Willich, S.N.2
  • 12
    • 0041742496 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Methodologic requirements for assessing surgical procedures in current medical literature
    • Jimenez RE, Gutierrez AR & Benitez IM, Methodologic requirements for assessing surgical procedures in current medical literature. World J Surg, 2003: 27: 229-33.
    • (2003) World J Surg , vol.27 , pp. 229-233
    • Jimenez, R.E.1    Gutierrez, A.R.2    Benitez, I.M.3
  • 13
    • 0027384557 scopus 로고
    • An analysis of review articles published in primary care journals
    • Silagy CA, An analysis of review articles published in primary care journals. Fam Pract, 1993: 10: 337-41.
    • (1993) Fam Pract , vol.10 , pp. 337-341
    • Silagy, C.A.1
  • 14
    • 0037024264 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Measuring the quality of editorial peer review
    • Jefferson T, Wager E & Davidoff F, Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. JAMA, 2002: 5: 2786-9.
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.5 , pp. 2786-2789
    • Jefferson, T.1    Wager, E.2    Davidoff, F.3
  • 16
    • 0026098758 scopus 로고
    • Agreement among reviewers of review articles
    • Oxman AD, Guyatt GH, Singer J & al, Agreement among reviewers of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol, 1991: 44: 91-8.
    • (1991) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.44 , pp. 91-98
    • Oxman, A.D.1    Guyatt, G.H.2    Singer, J.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.