Effect of variations in sensory feedback on performance in a virtual reaching task

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 450-462

  Durlach, Paula J ^a   Fowlkes, Jennifer ^b   Metevier, Christopher J ^c  

^a US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences   (United States)

^b CHI SYSTEMS INC   (United States)

^c US Army RDEC STC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25444482665     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/105474605774785299     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Bastien, C., Fortier-Brochu, E., & Rioux, I. (2003). Cognitive performance and sleep quality in the elderly suffering from chronic insomnia: Relationship between objective and subjective measures. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 54, 39-49.
2. Berlucchi, G. Heron, W., Hyman, G., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltá, C. (1971). Simple reaction times of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized visual stimuli. Brain, 94, 419-430.
3. Bingham, G. P., Zaal, F., Robin, D., & Shull, J. A. (2000). Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1436-1460.
4. Biocca, F., Kim, J., & Choi, J. K. Y. (2001). Visual touch in virtual environments: An exploratory study of presence, multimodal interfaces, and cross-modal sensory illusions. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10, 247-265.
5. Buneo, C. A., Jarvis, M. R., & Batista, A. P. (2002). Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching. Nature, 416, 632-636.
6. Crowe, A., Keeson, W., & Kuus, W., Van Vliet, R., & Zegeling, A. (1987). Proprioceptive accuracy in two dimensions. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 64, 831-846.
7. Derrick, E., & Dewar, R. (1970). Visual-tactual dominance relationship as a function of accuracy of tactile judgments. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 31, 935-939.
8. Driver, J., & Spence, C. (2000). Multisensory perception: Beyond modularity and convergence. Current Biology, 10, R731-R735.
9. Durlach, P. J., Edmunds, R., Howard, L., & Tipper, S. P. (2002). A rapid effect of caffeinated beverages on two choice reaction time tasks. Nutritional Neuroscience, 5, 433-442.
10. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
11. Gibson, J. J. (1933). Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 1-31.
12. Gillan, D. J., Holden, K., & Adam, S. (1992). How should Fitts' Law be applied to human-computer interaction? Interacting with Computers, 4, 289-313.
13. Haggard, P. (2001). Look and feel. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 462-463.
14. Hay, J. C., Pick, H. L., Jr., & Ikeda, K. (1965). Visual capture produced by prism spectacles. Psychonomic Science, 2, 215-216.
15. Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S., & Lilienthal, M. G. (1993). A simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ): A new method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 203-220.
16. Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Lilienthal, M. G., Berbaum, K. S., & Hettinger, L. (1992). Profile analysis of simulator sickness symptoms: Application to virtual environment systems. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 3, 295-301.
17. Kennett, S., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2002). Visuo-tactile links in covert exogenous spatial attention remap across changes in unseen hand posture. Perception and Psychophysics, 64, 1083-1094.
18. Lampton, D. R., Kraemer, R. E., Kolasinski, E. M., & Knerr, B. W. (1995). An investigation of simulator sickness in a tank driver trainer. U.S. Army Research Institute Research Report 1684. Alexandria, VA.
19. Lecuyer, A., Burkhardt, J. M., Coquillarty, S., & Coifett, P. (2001). "Boundary of illusion": An experiment of sensory integration with a pseudo-haptic system. Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality 2001, 115-122.
20. Lecuyer, A., Coquillarty, S., & Kheddar, A. (2000). Pseudohaptic feedback: Can isometric input devices simulate force feedback? In S. K. Feiner & D. Thalmann (Eds.), Virtual Reality 2000 (pp. 83-90). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
21. MacKenzie, I. S., & Buxton, W. (1992). Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems-CHI 1992, 219-226.
22. Maravita, A., Spence, C., Sergent, C., & Driver, J. (2002). Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates crossmodal interactions. Psychological Science, 13, 350-355.
23. Miller, E. A. (1972). Interaction of vision and touch in conflict and nonconflict form perception tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 96, 114-123.
24. Newport, R., Kindle, J. V., & Jackson, S. R. (2001). Links between vision and somatosensation: Vision can improve the felt position of the unseen hand. Current Biology, 11, 975-980.
25. Newport, R., Rabb, B., & Jackson, S. R. (2002). Noninformative vision improves haptic spatial perception. Current Biology, 12, 1661-1664.
26. Nielsen, T. I. (1963). Volition: A new experimental approach. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 225-230.
27. Pavani, F., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2000). Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11, 353-359.
28. Rorden, C., Heutnik, J., Greenfield, E., & Robertson, I. H. (1999). When a rubber hand "feels" what the real hand cannot. NeuroReport, 10, 135-138.
29. Sallnäs, E., & Zhai, S. (2003). Collaboration meets Fitts' Law: Passing virtual objects with and without haptic force feed-back. Proceedings of INTERACT 2003, IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 97-104.
30. Schmidt, I. W., Berg, I. J., & Deelman, B. G. (2001). Relations between subjective evaluations of memory and objective memory performance. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 93, 761-776.
31. Spence, C. (2003). Multisensory attention and tactile information processing. Behavioural Brain Research, 135, 57-64.
32. Tastevin, J. (1937). En partant de l'experience d'Aristotle [Starting from Aristotle's experience]. L'Encephale, 1, 57-84.
33. Tipper, S. P., Lloyd, D., & Shorland, B. (1998). Vision influences tactile perception without proprioceptive orienting. NeuroReport: An International Journal for the Rapid Communication of Research in Neuroscience, 9, 1741-1744.
34. Tipper, S. P., Phillips, N., Dancer, C., Lloyd, D., Howard, L. A., & McGlone, F. (2001). Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly. Experimental Brain Research, 139, 160-167.
35. van Beers, R. J., Sittig, A. C., & Denier van der Gon, J. J. (1996). How humans combine simultaneous proprioceptive and visual position information. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 253-261.
36. van Beers, R. J., Sittig, A. C., Denier van der Gon, J. J. (1999). Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 1355-1364.
37. van Beers, R. J., Wolpert, D. A., & Haggard, P. (2002). When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaption. Current Biology, 12, 834-837.
38. Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638-667.
39. Whisenand, T. G. & Emurian, H. H. (1996). Effects of angle approach on cursor movement with a mouse: Consideration of Fitts' Law. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 481-495.
40. Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7, 225-240.
41. Yu, C. H. (2002). An overview of remedial tools for the violation of parametric test assumptions in the SAS system. Proceedings of 2002 Western Users of SAS Software Conference, 172-178.