Comparison of theoretical proteomes: Identification of COGs with conserved and variable pI within the multimodal pI distribution

BMC Genomics

Volumn 6, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Nandi, Soumyadeep ^a   Mehra, Nipun ^a   Lynn, Andrew M ^a   Bhattacharya, Alok ^a  

^a JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; PROTEOME;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC DATABASE; GENOME ANALYSIS; ISOELECTRIC POINT; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NONHUMAN; ORTHOLOGY; PROKARYOTE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL STUDY;

PROKARYOTA;

EID: 25444480245     PISSN: 14712164     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-6-116     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bjellqvist B, Hughes GJ, Pasquali C, Paquet N, Ravier F, Sanchez JC, Frutiger S, Hochstrasser D: The focusing positions of polypeptides in immobilized pH gradients can be predicted from their amino acid sequences. Electrophoresis. 1993, 14(10):1023-31
2. Altland K, Becher P, Rossmann U, Bjellqvist B: Isoelectric focusing of basic proteins: the problem of oxidation of cysteines. Electrophoresis 1988, 9(9): 474-85
3. Van Bogelen RA, Schiller EE, Thomas JD, Neidhardt FC: Diagnosis of cellular states of microbial organisms using proteomics. Electrophoresis 1999, 20: 2149-2159
4. Schwartz R, Ting CS, King J: Whole proteome isoelectric point values correlate with subcellular localization of proteins for organisms within the three domains of life. Gen. Res. 2001, 11, 703-709
5. Weiller GF, Caraux G, Sylvester N: The modal distribution of protein isoelectric points reflects amino acid properties rather than sequence evolution. Proteomics. 2004, 4(4): 943-9
6. Knight CG, Kassen R, Hebestreit H, Rainey PB.: Global analysis of predicted proteomes: functional adaptation of physical properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101(22):8390-5
7. Tekaia F, Yeramian E, Dujon B: Amino acid composition of genomes, lifestyles of organisms, and evolutionary trends: a global picture with correspondence analysis. Gene. 2002, 297(1-2):51-60
8. Brocchieri L: Environmental signatures in proteome properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004, 101(22): 8257-8258
9. Kennedy SP, Ng WV, Salzberg SL, Hood L, DasSarma S.: Understanding the adaptation of Halobacterium species NRC-1 to its extreme environment through computational analysis of its genome sequence. Genome Res. 2001, 11(10):1641-50
10. Karlin S, Brocchieri L, Trent J, Blaisdell BE, Mrazek J.: Heterogeneity of genome and proteome content in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes. Theor Popul Biol. 2002 61(4):367-90
11. Kumar S, Nussinov R.: How do thermophilic proteins deal with heat? Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001, 58(9):1216-33
12. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ: A Genomics Perspective on Protein Families. Science 1997, 278(5338): 631-7
13. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, Krylov DM, Mazumder R, Mekhedov SL, Nikolskaya AN, Rao BS, Smirnov S, Sverdlov AV, Vasudevan S, Wolf YI, Yin JJ, Natale DA.: The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003, 4(1):41
14. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA: Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1952, 47: 583-621. Addendum 1953, 48:907-911
15. Website title [ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/pub/COG/ and ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes].
16. Website title [http://www.expasy.org/tools/pi_tool.html].
17. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 1994, 22(22): 4673-4680
18. Felsenstein J: PHYLIP: Phylogeny inference package. Cladistics 1989, 5: 164-166
19. Stajich JE, Block D, Boulez K, Brenner SE, Chervitz SA, Dagdigian C, Fuellen G, Gilbert JGR, Korf I, Lapp H, Lehväslaiho H, Matsalla C, Mungall CJ, Osborne BI, Pocock MR, Schattner P, Senger M, Stein LD, Stupka E, Wilkinson MD, Birney E: The Bioperl Toolkit: Perl Modules for the Life Sciences. Genome Research 2002, 12(10):1611-1618.
20. Dunn DJ: Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. Technometrics, 1964, 5:241-252
21. Claros MG, von Heijne G: TopPred II: an improved software for membrane protein structure predictions. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1994
22. Website title [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/old/ COGhelp.html#function_code].