Standards for evaluating proposals to develop ethics curricula

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 501-507

  Weil, Vivian ^a  

^a ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Engineering; Online; Practical ethics; Professional ethics; Proposals; Science; Standards; Teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 25444479369     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-005-0020-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. National Science Foundation. "Review Criteria". Grant Proposal Guide. NSF 04-23. July 2004. p. 39; http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/gpg/nsf04_23/ nsf04_23.pdf
2. http://ethics.iit.edu/codes/index.html.
3. Sieber, J.E. (2005) Misconceptions and Realities about Teaching Online, Science and Engineering Ethics 11: 329-340.
4. Huff, C. and Frey, W. (2005) Moral Pedagogy and Practical Ethics, Science and Engineering Ethics 11: 389-408.
5. Davis, M. (1997) Developing and Using Cases to Teach Practical Ethics. Teaching Philosophy 20/4: 353-385.
6. Schrag, B. (2005) Teaching Research Ethics: Can Web-Based Instruction Satisfy Appropriate Pedagogical Objectives? Science and Engineering Ethics 11: 347-366.
7. Segerstrale, U. (2001) "Judging 'Good Science': Toward Cooperation between Scientists and Lawyers," in: Weil, V. (ed.) Trying Times: Science and Responsibilities after Daubert, Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions and Institute for Science, Law and Technology, IIT: Chicago, Il, pp. 48-62.
8. Davis, Michael (1998) Thinking Like an Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession. Practical and Professional Ethics Series, Oxford University Press, New York.