Routine history as compared to audio computer-assisted self-interview for prenatal care history taking

Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 701-706

  Mears, Molly ^a   Coonrod, Dean V ^a,b   Bay, R Curtis ^a   Mills, Terry E ^a   Watkins, Michelle C ^a  

^a Maricopa Integrated Health System   (United States)

^b MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

ACASI; Computers; Medical history taking; Prenatal care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; AUDIO COMPUTER ASSISTED SELF INTERVIEW; COMPUTER; CYSTIC FIBROSIS; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; EPILEPSY; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INDUCED ABORTION; INTERVIEW; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; NEURAL TUBE DEFECT; NORMAL HUMAN; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRENATAL CARE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; SMOKING; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; THYROID DISEASE; VIOLENCE;

ABORTION, INDUCED; ADULT; COMPUTERS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SMOKING; SPOUSE ABUSE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 25444478661     PISSN: 00247758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, et al: Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology [see comments]. Science 1998;280: 867-873
2. Des Jarlais DC, Paone D, Milliken J, et al: Audio-computer interviewing to measure risk behaviour for HIV among injecting drug users: A quasi-randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 353:1657-1661
3. Metzger DS, Koblin B, Turner C, et al: Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: Utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies: HIVNET Vaccine Preparedness Study Protocol Team. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:99-106
4. Newman JC, Des Jarlais DC, Turner CF, et al: The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. Am J Public Health 2002;92:294-297
5. McFarlane J, Christoffel K, Bateman L, et al: Assessing for abuse: Self-report versus nurse interview. Public Health Nurs 1991;8:245-250
6. Straus MA: Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The ConflictTactic (CT) Scales. J Marriage Fam 1979;41:75-88
7. Rhodes KV, Lauderdale DS, He T, et al: "Between me and the computer": Increased detection of intimate partner violence using a computer questionnaire. Ann Emerg Med 2002;40: 476-484
8. Bloom DE: Technology, experimentation, and the quality of survey data [comment]. Science 1998;280:847-848
9. Kissinger P, Rice J, Farley T, et al: Application of computer-assisted interviews to sexual behavior research. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149:950-954
10. McFarlane J, Parker B, Soeken K, et al: Assessing for abuse during pregnancy: Severity and frequency of injuries and associated entry into prenatal care. JAMA 1992;267:3176-3178
11. Coonrod DV, Bay RC, Balcazar H: Ethnicity, acculturation and obstetric outcomes: Different risk factor profiles in low- and high-acculturation Hispanics and in white non-Hispanics. J Reprod Med 2004;49:17-22
12. Sagrestano LM, Rodriguez AC, Carroll D, et al: A comparison of standardized measures of psychosocial variables with single-item screening measures used in an urban obstetric clinic. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2002;31:147-155
13. Gerbert B, Caspers N, Bronstone A, et al: A qualitative analysis of how physicians with expertise in domestic violence approach the identification of victims. Ann Intern Med 1999; 131:578-584