|
Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 679-704
|
Is there any contradiction between the stress and energy failure criteria in micromechanical tests? Part III. Experimental observation of crack propagation in the microbond test
|
Author keywords
Energy release rate; Failure criteria; Interfacial bond strength; Interfacial friction; Microbond test
|
Indexed keywords
CRACK PROPAGATION;
EXTRAPOLATION;
FAILURE ANALYSIS;
FRICTION;
INTERFACES (MATERIALS);
MATHEMATICAL MODELS;
PARAMETER ESTIMATION;
SHEAR STRESS;
STRESS ANALYSIS;
CRACK TIPS;
CRACKS;
ENERGY RELEASE RATE;
ENERGY RELEASE RATE;
FAILURE CRITERIA;
INTERFACIAL BOND STRENGTH;
INTERFACIAL FRICTION;
MICROBOND TEST;
COMPOSITE MICROMECHANICS;
CRACK PROPAGATION;
CRACK LENGTH;
CRACK RESISTANCE;
DEBONDED REGION;
EFFECTIVE TOOL;
ENERGY FAILURE;
EXPERIMENTAL OBSERVATION;
FAILURE CRITERIA;
FIBER/MATRIX INTERFACE;
FRACTURE MECHANICS ANALYSIS;
INTERFACE CHARACTERIZATION;
INTERFACIAL BOND STRENGTH;
INTERFACIAL FRICTION;
INTERFACIAL FRICTIONAL STRESS;
INTERFACIAL TOUGHNESS;
LOCAL INTERFACIAL SHEAR STRENGTH;
MATRIX;
MATRIX SYSTEMS;
MICROBOND TEST;
MICROMECHANICAL TESTS;
R-CURVES;
STRESS-BASED MODELS;
|
EID: 25444463288
PISSN: 01694243
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1163/1568561054890462 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (9)
|
References (32)
|