Capturing intervention effects over time: Reanalysis of a critical time intervention for homeless mentally ill men

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 95, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1760-1766

  Lennon, Mary Clare ^a   McAllister, William ^c   Kuang, Li ^a   Herman, Daniel B ^a,b  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICAL TIME INTERVENTION; DATA ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; HOMELESSNESS; HOUSING; HUMAN; LATENT CLASS GROWTH ANALYSIS; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; DATA COLLECTION; DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION; HOMELESS PERSONS; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEW YORK CITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHIATRY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 25444459069     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.064402     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Muthén BO. Latent variable analysis: growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In: Kaplan D, ed. Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Science. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 2004;345-368 .
2. Nagin DS. Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semi-parametric, group-based approach. Psychol Methods. 1999;4:139-177.
3. Susser ES, Valencia E, Conover S, Felix A, Tsai W-Y, Wyatt RJ. Preventing recurrent homelessness among mentally ill men: a "critical time" intervention after discharge from a shelter. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:256-262.
4. Caton CL, Wyatt RJ, Felix A, Grunberg J, Boanerges D. Follow-up of chronically homeless mentally ill men. Am J Psychiatry. 1993;150:1639-1642.
5. Dickey B, Gonzalez O, Latimer E, Powers K, Schutt RK, Goldfinger SM. Use of mental health services by formerly homeless adults residing in group and independent housing. Psychiatr Serv. 1996;47:152-158.
6. Drake RE, Yovetich NA, Bebout RR, Harris M, McHugo GJ. Integrated treatment for dually diagnosed homeless adults. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1997;185:298-305.
7. Goldfinger SM, Schutt RK, Tolomiczenko GS, et al. Housing placement and subsequent days homeless among formerly homeless adults with mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 1999;50:674-679.
8. Lipton FR, Siegel C, Hannigan A, Samuels J, Baker S. Tenure in supportive housing for homeless persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2000;51:479-486.
9. Murray R, Baier J, North C, Lato M, Eskew C. One-year status of homeless mentally ill clients who completed a transitional residential program. Community Ment Health J. 1997;33(1):43-50.
10. Shern DL, Felton CJ, Hough RL, et al. Housing outcomes for homeless adults with mental illness: results from the second-round McKinney Program. Psychiatr Serv. 1997;48:239-241.
11. Tsemberis S, Eichenberg RF. Pathways to Housing: supported housing for street-dwelling homeless individuals with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatr Serv. 2000;51:487-493.
12. Lehman AF, Dixon LB, Kernan E, DeForge BR, Postrado LT. A randomized trial of assertive community treatment for homeless persons with severe mental illness. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54:1038-1043.
13. Hedeker D. A mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression model. Stat Med. 2003;22:1433-1446.
14. Kuhn R, Culhane DP. Applying cluster analysis to test a typology of homelessness by pattern of shelter utilization: results from the analysis of administrative data. Am J Community Psychol. 1998;26:207-232.
15. Humphreys K, Rosenheck R. Sequential validation of cluster analytic subtypes of homeless veterans. Am J Community Psychol. 1995;23:75-98.
16. Sosin M, Piliavin I, Westerfelt H. Toward a longitudinal analysis of homelessness. J Soc Issues. 1990;46:157-174.
17. Rossi PH. Down and Out in America: The Origins of Homelessness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1986.
18. Jahiel R. Empirical studies of homeless populations in the 1980s. In: Jahiel R, ed. Homelessness: A Prevention Oriented Approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1992:40-56.
19. Bergman LR, Magnusson D. A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol 1997;9:291-319.
20. Muthén BO, Muthén LK. Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analysis: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000;24:882-891.
21. New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America. Rockville, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2003.
22. Muthén BO, Brown CH, Masyn K, et al. General growth mixture modeling for randomized preventive interventions. Biostatistics. 2002;3:459-475.
23. Muthén BO. Statistical and substantive checking in growth mixture modeling. Psychol Methods. 2003;8:369-377.
24. Muthén BO. Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: new opportunities for latent class/latent growth modeling. In: Collins LM, Sayer A, eds. New Methods for the Analysis of Change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2001:291-322.
25. Muthén BO. Latent variable mixture modeling. In: Marcoulides GA, Schumacker RE, eds. New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001:1-33.
26. Nagin DS, Land KC. Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: specific estimation of a non-parametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology. 1993;31:327-362.
27. Bauer DJ, Curran PJ. Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychol Methods. 2003;8:338-363.
28. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User's Guide. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: Muthén & Muthén; 2004.
29. Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993;90:773-795.
30. Lo Y, Mendell NR, Rubin DB. Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika. 2001;88:767-778.
31. Muthén BO. Beyond SEM: general latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika. 2002;29:81-117.
32. Wedel M, Kamakura W Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations. Boston: Kluwer Academic; 1998.
33. Hennessy M, Bolan GA, Hoxworth T, et al. Using growth curves to determine the timing of booster sessions. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999;6:322-342.
34. Raftery AE. Bayesian model selection in social research. Social Methodol. 1995;25:111-163.
35. Jeffries NO. A note on testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika. 2003;90:991-994.
36. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling. 2002;9:599-620.
37. TenHave TR, Coyne J, Salzer M, Katz I. Research to improve the quality of care for depression: alternatives to the simple randomized clinical trial. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2003;25:115-123.