Two kinds of global perceptual separability and curvature

Psychophysics Beyond Sensation: Laws and Invariants of Human Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 89-109

  Townsend, James T ^a   Spencer Smith, Jesse ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25444452636     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610744     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Ashby, F.G. (Ed.). (1992). Multidimensional models of perception and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Ashby, F.G. (2000). A stochastic version of general recognition theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 310-329.
3. Ashby, F.G., & Maddox, W.T. (1996). Perceptual separability, decisional separability, and the identification-speeded classification relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 795-817.
4. Ashby, F.G., & Townsend, J.T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.
5. Beals, R., Krantz, D.H., & Tversky, A. (1968). Foundations of multidimensional scaling. Psychological Review, 75, 127-142.
6. Boothby, W.M. (1986). An introduction to differentiable manifolds and Riemannian geometry (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.
7. Busemann, H. (1955). The geometry of geodesics. New York: Academic Press.
8. Carroll, J.D., & Chang, J.J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of "Eckart-Young" decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 283-319.
9. Cox, T.F.R. & Cox, M.A.A. (1991). Multidimensional scaling on a sphere. Communications in Statistics. A: Theory and Methods, 20, 2943-2953.
10. Drösler, J. (1979). Foundations of multidimensional metric scaling in Cayley-Klein geometries. British Journal of Statistical and Mathematical Psychology, 32, 185-211.
11. Dzhafarov, E.N., & Colonius, H. (1999). Fechnerian metrics in unidimensional and multidimensional stimulus spaces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 239-268.
12. D'Zmura, M, & Iverson, G. (1993). Color constancy: I. Basic theory of two-stage linear recovery of spectral descriptions for lights and surfaces. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 10, 2148-2165.
13. Garner, W.R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
14. Garner, W.R. & Morton, J. (1969). Perceptual independence: Definitions, models, and experimental paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 233-259.
15. Gati, I., & Tversky, A. (1982). Representations of qualitative and quantitative dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Pereption and Performance, 8, 325-340.
16. Helmholtz, H.von (1995). The facts on perception. In D. Cahan (Ed. & Trans.), Science and culture: Popular and philosophical essays (p. 351). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1878.).
17. Hoffman, D.D. (1998). Visual intelligence: How we create what we see. New York: Norton.
18. Hoffman, W.C. (1968). The neuron as a lie group germ and a lie product. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 25, 423-440.
19. Hoffman, W.C., & Dodwell, P.C. (1985). Geometric psychology generates the visual Gestalt. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 491-528.
20. Indow, T. (1967). Two interpretations of binocular visual space: Hyperbolic and euclidean. Annals of the Japan Association for the Philosophy of Science, 3, 19-32.
21. Indow, T. (1982). An approach to geometry of visual space with no a priori mapping: Multidimensional scaling according Riemannian metrics. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 26, 204-236.
22. Kadlec, H., & Hicks, C.L. (1998). Invariance of perceptual spaces and perceptual separability of stimulus dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 80-104.
23. Kadlec, H., & Townsend, J.T. (1992). Signal detection analysis of multidimensional interactions, In F.G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 181-231). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Kruskal, J.B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1-27.
25. Landauer, T.K., & Dumais, S.T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
26. Lee, J.M. (2000). Introduction to topological manifolds. New York: Springer.
27. Levin, D.N. (2000). A differential geometric description of the relations among perceptions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 241-284.
28. Lindman, H., & Caelli, T. (1978). Constant curvature Riemannian scaling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 17, 89-109.
29. Maddox, W.T., (1992). Perceptual and decisional separabilty, In F.G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 147-180). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Marley, A.A.J. (1992). Developing and characterizing multidimensional Thurstone and Luce models for identification and preference, In F.G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition. Scientific psychology series (pp. 299-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31. Nosofsky, R.M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification/categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
32. O'Neill, B. (1997). Elementary differential geometry. (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.
33. O'Toole, A.J., Wenger, M.J., & Townsend, J.T. (2001). Quantitative models of perceiving and remembering faces: Precedents and possibilities, In M.J. Wenger & J.T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational geometric and process perspectives on facial cognition: Context and challenges (pp. 1-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
34. Pizlo, Z. (1994). A theory of shape constancy based on perspective invariants. Vision Research, 34, 1637-1658.
35. Shepard, R.N. (1962). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Part I. Psychometrika, 27, 125-140.
36. Shepard, R.N. (1964). Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 54-87.
37. Shepard, R.N., & Carroll, J.D. (1966). Parametric representation of nonlinear data structures, In P. Krishnaiah (Ed.), Multivariate analysis (pp. 561-592). New York: Academic Press.
38. Shepard, R.N., & Farrell, J.E. (1985). Representation of the orientations of shapes. Acta Psychologica, 59, 103-121.
39. Suppes, P., Krantz, D.M., Luce, R.D., & Tversky, A. (1989). Foundations of measurement: Vol II. Geometrical, threshold, and probabilistic representations. New York: Academic Press.
40. Thomas, R.D. (1995). Gaussian general recognition theory and perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 102, 192-200.
41. Townsend, J.T., Solomon, B. & Spencer-Smith, J. (2001). The perfect Gestalt: Infinite dimensional Riemannian face spaces, and other aspects of face perception, In M.J. Wenger & J.T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational geometric and process perspectives on facial cognition: Context and challenges (pp. 39-82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Townsend, J.T., & Thomas, R.D. (1993). On the need for a general quantitative theory of pattern similarity, In S.C. Masin (Ed.), Foundations of perceptual theory (Advances in psychology, Vol. 99, pp. 297-368). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland/Elsevier Science.
43. Wenger, M.J. & Townsend, J.T. (2001). Faces as Gestalt stimuli: Process characteristics, In M.J. Wenger & J.T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational geometric and process perspectives on facial cognition: Context and challenges (pp. 229-284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Wyszecki, G. (1986). Color appearance, In K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman & J.P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance, (Vol. 1, 9-1-9-57). New York: Wiley.