Law enforcement officers serving as jurors: Guilty because charged?

Psychology, Crime and Law

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 305-313

  Culhane, Scott E ^a   Hosch, Harmon M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

Author keywords

Juror decision making; Law enforcement officers; Schema Theory; Voir dire

Indexed keywords

EID: 25444450101     PISSN: 1068316X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10683160412331294826     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. ALR (1976a). Law enforcement officers as qualified jurors in criminal cases. 72 ALR3d, 895-951.
2. ALR (1976b). Former law enforcement officers as qualified jurors in criminal cases. 72 ALR3d, 958-972.
3. Dennis v. United States, 339 US 162 (US SC 1950).
4. Gobert, J. J., & Jordan, W. E. (1990). Jury Selection: the Law, Art, and Science of Selecting a Jury. Colorado Springs, CO: Shepard's/McGraw Hill.
5. Mikus v. United States of America. 433 F.2d 719 (2nd Cir. 1970).
6. Morgan, K., & Morran, S. (2003). City Crime Rankings (10th edition). Lawrence, KS: Morgan Quitno Press.
7. Olczak, P. V., Kaplan, M. F. & Penrod S. (1991). Attorney's lay psychology and its effectiveness in selecting jurors: three empirical studies. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 431-452.
8. Plan for Random Jury Selection of 1988, 28 U.S.C. §1863 (2002).
9. Seltzer, R., Venuti, M., & Lopes, G. (1991). Juror honesty during the voir dire. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 451-462.
10. Stalans, L. J., & Lurigio, A. J. (1990). Lay and professionals' beliefs about crime and criminal sentencing: a need for theory, perhaps schema theory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 333-349.
11. Sidanius, J., Liu, J. H., Shaw III, J. S., & Pratto, F. (1994). Social dominance orientation, hierarchy attenuators and hierarchy enhancers: social dominance theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 338-366.
12. United States v. Daly, Klemp, Diaz, Criswell and Ryan, 716 F.2d 1499 (9th Cir. 1983).
13. United States v. Morales and Mendez, 185 F.3d 74 (2nd Cir. 1999).
14. United States v. Mitchell and Williamson, 556 F.2d 371 (6th Cir. 1977).
15. United States v. Wood, 299 US 123; 57 S. Ct. 177; 81 L. Ed. 78; (US SC 1936).
16. Vidmar, N. (2000). A historical and comparative perspective on the common law jury. In N. Vidmar (Ed.), World Jury Systems (pp. 1-52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.