Remediation of petroleum-contaminated loess soil by surfactant-enhanced flushing technique

Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering

Volumn 40, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1877-1893

  Zhu, Kun ^a   Hart, William ^b   Yang, Jiantao ^c  

^a LANZHOU JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Flushing; Loess soil; Petroleum contamination; Remediation; Surfactants

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLS; DIESEL FUELS; REMEDIATION; SOILS; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;

ANIONIC SURFACTANTS; FLUSHING; LOESS SOILS; PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION;

CRUDE PETROLEUM;

ALKYLBENZENESULFONIC ACID; ANIONIC SURFACTANT; CETRIMIDE; DIESEL FUEL; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; ETHER DERIVATIVE; FRESH WATER; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; NONIONIC SURFACTANT; OCTANOL; ORGANIC COMPOUND; PETROLEUM; SULFATE; SURFACTANT;

BIODEGRADABILITY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DESORPTION; MICELLE; MODEL; PARTITION COEFFICIENT; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTION; SOLUBILIZATION; TECHNIQUE;

CARCINOGENS, ENVIRONMENTAL; GASOLINE; MICELLES; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANTS; SOLUBILITY; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; WATER MOVEMENTS;

EID: 25444449511     PISSN: 10934529     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10934520500183899     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. USDOE (U.S. Department of Energy), Guidance for developing a site-specific risk-based end state vision, 2003, Ref. 4, 5-9 (www.em.doe.gov/).
2. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), In situ soil flushing, http://clu-in.org. 2000, 6-12.
3. Davis, G.B. Site clean-up the pros and cons of disposal and in situ and ex-site remediation. Land Contam. & Reclam. 1997, 5, 287-290.
4. Abdul, A.S.; Gibson, T.L.; Ang, C.C. In situ surfactant washing of polychorinated biphenyls and oils from a contaminated site. Ground Water 1992, 30, 210-231.
5. APHA (American Public Health Association, American Water workers association and Water pollution Federation), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th Ed., Washington, DC, 1989; 423-426.
6. Zhong, Z.X.; Xue, J.L. Research Report No. 85-908-02-057, 1995, File 3, 18-21.
7. Zhao, G.; Zhu, B.Y. Principles of surfactant actions. Press of Light-Industry, Beijing, China, 2003; 98-105.
8. Abu-Ashour, J.; Shahalam, A.B. Water infiltration through diesel contaminated soil. J. Environm. Sci. Health 2002, A37, 1041-1049.
9. Harwell, J.H. Factors affecting surfactant performance in groundwater remediation applications. Proc. of ACS Symposium, Series 49, Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC. 1992; 124-132.
10. Dwarakanath, V.; Pope, G.A. Surfactant phase behavior with field degreasing solvent. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 4842-4848.
11. Jafvert Chad, T. Sediment- and saturated-soil-associated reactions involving an anionic surfactant (dodecylsulfate). 2. Partition of PAH compounds among phases. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1991, 25, 1039-1045.
12. Dong, L.; Dai S. The kinetics of hydrophobic pollutants solubilization into surfactant solution. Chin. J. Environ. Sci. (Chinese Edition) 2000, 21, 27-31.
13. David, A.; Edwards, R.; Luthy, G.; Zhongbao L. Solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in micellar nonionic surfactant solutions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1991, 25, 127-133.
14. Wu, Q.H.; Mai, B.X. Distribution state of PAHs and organochlorine pesticides in sediments. China Environ. Sci. 2004, 24, 89-93.
15. Abdul, A.D.; Gibson, T. L.; Rai, D. N. Selection of surfactants for the removal of petroleum products from shallow sandy aquifer. Ground Water 1990, 28, 920-926.
16. Liu, Z.C.; Zhu, K. Pollution and control of groundwater system, Press of Environmental Science, Beijing, 1992; 499-506.
17. Lauryn, S. In situ flushing with surfactants and cosolvents, 2000; 3-5. (http://www.clu-in.org).
18. Diane, S.R. In situ flushing technology. Status Report of Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center, US, 1998; Series No. TS-98-01, 5-7.