Predictive value of an early Glasgow Outcome Scale score: 15-Month score changes

Journal of Neurosurgery

Volumn 103, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 239-245

  Miller, Kelly J ^b   Schwab, Karen A ^a   Warden, Deborah L ^b  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Glasgow Outcome Scale; Head injury; Severity outcome prediction; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARMY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; DISEASE DURATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HEAD INJURY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNCONSCIOUSNESS; BRAIN INJURY; CLASSIFICATION; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOLDIER; TIME; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; FEMALE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MILITARY PERSONNEL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS; UNCONSCIOUSNESS;

EID: 25444437769     PISSN: 00223085     EISSN: 00223085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.103.2.0239     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson SI, Housley AM, Jones PA, Slattery J, Miller JD: Glasgow Outcome Scale: an inter-rater reliability study. Brain Inj 7:309-317, 1993
2. Becker KJ, Baxter AB, Cohen WA, Bybee HM, Tirschwell DL, Newell DW, et al: Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies. Neurology 56:766-772, 2001
3. Brooks DN, Hosie J, Bond MR, Jennett B, Aughton M: Cognitive sequelae of severe head injury in relation to the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49:549-553, 1986
4. Choi SC, Muizelaar JP, Barnes TY, Marmarou A, Brooks DM, Young HF: Prediction tree for severely head-injured patients. J Neurosurg 75:251-255, 1991
5. Choi SC, Narayan RK, Anderson RL, Ward JD: Enhanced specificity of prognosis in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 69: 381-385, 1988
6. Groswasser Z, Schwab K, Salazar AM: Assessment of outcome following traumatic brain injury in adults, in Herndon RM (ed): Handbook of Neurologic Rating Scales. New York: Demos Vermande, 1997, pp 187-208
7. Hall K, Cope DN, Rappaport M: Glasgow Outcome Scale and Disability Rating Scale: comparative usefulness in following recovery in traumatic head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 66:35-37, 1985
8. Hellawell DJ, Taylor R, Pentland B: Cognitive and psychosocial outcome following moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 13:489-504, 1999
9. Jennett B, Bond M: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1:480-484, 1975
10. Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond MR, Brooks N: Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 44:285-293, 1981
11. Jennett B, Teasdale G, Braakman R, Minderhoud J, Heiden J, Kurze T: Prognosis of patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 4:283-289, 1979
12. Jennett B, Teasdale G, Braakman R, Minderhoud J, Knill-Jones R: Predicting outcome in individual patients after severe head injury. Lancet 1:1031-1034, 1976
13. Katz DI, Alexander MP: Traumatic brain injury. Predicting course of recovery and outcome for patients admitted to rehabilitation. Arch Neurol 51:661-670, 1994
14. Kaye AH, Andrewes D: Glasgow Outcome Scale: research scale or blunt instrument? Lancet 356:1540-1541, 2000
15. Levin HS, Boake C, Song J, McCauley S, Contant C, Diaz-Marchan P, et al: Validity and sensitivity to change of the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. A comparative analysis of the clinical examination, multimodality evoked potentials, CT scanning, and intracranial pressure. J Neurotrauma 18:575-584, 2001
16. Maas AIR, Braakman R, Schouten HJA, Minderhoud JM, van Zomeren AH: Agreement between physicians on assessment of outcome following severe head injury. J Neurosurg 58:321-325, 1983
17. Narayan RK, Greenberg RP, Miller JD, Enas GG, Choi SC, Kishore PR, et al: Improved confidence of outcome prediction in severe head injury. A comparative analysis of the clinical examination, multimodality evoked potentials, CT scanning, and intracranial pressure J Neurosurg 54:751-762, 1981
18. Nissen JJ, Jones PA, Signorini DF, Murray LS, Teasdale GM, Miller JD: Glasgow head injury outcome prediction program: an independent assessment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 67:796-799, 1999
19. Novack TA, Bush BA, Meythaler JM, Canupp K: Outcome after traumatic brain injury: pathway analysis of contributions from premorbid, injury severity, and recovery variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:300-305, 2001
20. Pettigrew LEL, Wilson JTL, Teasdale GM: Assessing disability after head injury: improved use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurosurg 89:939-943, 1998
21. Salazar AM: Rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. JAMA 284:1783-1784, 2000
22. Sbordone RJ: A conceptual model of neuropsychologically-based cognitive rehabilitation, in Williams JM, Long CJ (eds): The Rehabilitation of Cognitive Disabilities. New York: Plenum Press, 1987
23. Spettell CM, Ellis DW, Ross SE, Sandel ME, O'Malley KF, Stein SC, et al: Time of rehabilitation admission and severity of trauma: effect on brain injury outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72:320-325, 1991
24. Teasdale GM, Pettigrew LEL, Wilson JTL, Murray G, Jennett B: Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma 15:587-597, 1998
25. Thornhill S, Teasdale GM, Murray GD, McEwen J, Roy CW, Penny KI: Disability in young people and adults one year after head injury: prospective cohort study. Br Med J 320:1631-1635, 2000
26. Waxman K, Sundine MF, Young RF: Is early prediction of outcome in severe head injury possible? Arch Surg 126:1237-1242, 1991
27. Wilson JTL, Pettigrew LEL, Teasdale GM: Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 15:573-585, 1998