Determination of effort level, exaggeration, and malingering in neurocognitive assessment

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 277-283

  Lynch, William J ^a,b  

^a ABPP/ABCN ^*

^b ABPP ABCN   (United States)

Author keywords

Effort level testing; Malingering assessment; TBI assessment

Indexed keywords

BRAIN INJURY; CARDIAC ANXIETY; COGNITION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EXAGGERATION; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALINGERING; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; REVIEW; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING; VALIDATION PROCESS; VERBAL MEMORY;

EID: 2542642268     PISSN: 08859701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001199-200405000-00008     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Green P, Lees-Haley P, Allen LM. The Word Memory Test in the validity of neuropsychological test scores. J Forensic Neuropsychol. 2002;2:97-124.
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic Criteria From DSM-IV TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
3. Miller H. Accident neurosis. Br Med J. 1961;1:919-925.
4. Binder LM. Persisting symptoms after mild head injury: a review of the post-concussive syndrome. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1986;8:323-346.
5. Pankratz L, Binder LM. Malingering on intellectual and neuropsychological measures. In: Rogers R, ed. Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford; 1997:223-236.
6. Rogers R. Toward an empirical model of malingering and deception. Behav Sci Law. 1984;2:93-112.
7. Rogers R. Introduction. In: Rogers R, ed. Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford; 1997.
8. Frederick R. Review of the validity indicator profile. J Forensic Neuropsychol. 2002;2:125-145.
9. Heaton RK, Smith HH, Lehman RAW, Vogt AT. Prospects for faking believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1978;46:892-900.
10. Faust D, Hart K, Guilmette TJ. Pediatric malingering: the capacity of children to fake believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56:578-582.
11. Faust D, Hart K, Guilmette TJ, Arkes HR. Neuropsychologists' capacity to detect adolescent malingerers. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 1988;19:508-515.
12. Bourg S, Connor EJ, Landis EE. The impact of expertise and sufficient information on psychologists' ability to detect malingering. Behav Sci Law. 1995;13:505-515.
13. Franzen MD, Iverson GL. Detecting negative response bias and diagnosing malingering. In: Snyder PJ, Nussbaum PD, eds. Clinical Neuropsychology: A Pocket Handbook for Assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1998.
14. Rey A, Osterrieth PA. Translations of excerpts from Andre Rey's Psychological examination of traumatic encephalopathy and PA Osterrieth's The Complex Figure Copy Test. Clin Neuropsychol. 1993;7:4-21.
15. Frederick R. A review of Rey's strategies for detecting malingered neuropsychological impairment. J Forensic Neuropsychol. 2002;2:1-25.
16. Butcher JN, Dahlstrom WG, Graham JR, Tellegen A, Kaemmer B. MMPI-2: Manual for Administration and Scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press, 1989.
17. Morey LC. Personality Assessment Inventory Professional manual. Odessa, Fla: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1991.
18. Reitan RM, Wolfson D. Detection of malingering and invalid test results using the Halstead-Reitan Battery. J Forensic Neuropsychol. 2002;3:275-314.
19. Golden C, Grier C. Detecting malingering on the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery. In: Reynolds C, ed. Detection of Malingering in Head Injury Litigation. New York: Plenum; 1996.
20. Hiscock M, Hiscock CK. Refining the forced-choice method for the detection of malingering. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1989;11:967-974.
21. Binder LM. Assessment of malingering after mild head trauma with the Portland Digit Recognition Test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1993;15:170-183.
22. Binder LM. Portland Digit Recognition Test Manual. 2nd ed. Beaverton, Ore: author; 1993.
23. Binder LM. Portland Digit Recognition Test: a review of validation data and clinical use. J Forensic Neuropsychol. 2002;2:27-41.
24. Binder LM. An abbreviated form of the Portland Digit Recognition Test. Clin Neuropsychol. 1993;7:104-107.
25. Slick DJ, Hopp G, Strauss E, Thompson GB. Victoria Symptom Validity Test Version 1.0 Professional Manual. Odessa, Fla: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1997.
26. Thompson G. Victoria Symptom Validity Test: an enhanced test of symptom validity. J Forensic Neuropsychol. 2002;2:43-67.
27. Allen L, Conder RL, Green P, Cox DR. CARB '97 Manual for the Computerised Assessment of Response Bias. Durham, NC: CogniSyst; 1997.
28. Allen L, Iverson G, Green P. Computerized assessment of response bias in forensic neuropsychology. J Forensic Neuropsychol. 2002;3:205-225.
29. Tombaugh TN. The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). Toronto: MultiHealth Systems; 1996.
30. Tombaugh TN. Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in forensic psychology. J Forensic Neuropsychol. 2002;2:69-96.
31. Green P, Allen L, Astner K. Manual for Computerised Word Memory Test. Durham, NC: CogniSyst; 1996.
32. Iverson G, Green P, Gervais R. Using the Word Memory Test to detect biased responding in head injury litigation. J Cogn Rehabil. March/April 1999;17:2-6.
33. Allen L, Green P. CARB and WMT effort test scores of a that are in 57 patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1999;14:789.
34. Frederick R. The Validity Indicator Profile Manual. Minneapolis: NCS-Pearson; 1997.
35. Mittenberg W, Patton C, Canyock E, Condit D. Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002;24:1094-1102.
36. Green P, Iverson GL. Validation of the computerized assessment of response bias and litigating patients with head injuries. Clin Neuropsychol. 2001;15:492-497.