Continuing the conversation on “what constitutes publishable rhetorical criticism?”: A response

Communication Studies

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 392-402

  Jordan, John W ^a   Olson, Kathryn M ^a   Goldzwig, Steven R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542637744     PISSN: 10510974     EISSN: 17451035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10510970309363297     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Black, E., 1970. The second persona. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 56: 109–119.
2. Blair, C., Brown, J. R., and Baxter, L. A., 1994. Disciplining the feminine. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80: 383–409.
3. Booth, W. C., 1972. “ The rhetorical stance ”. In Contemporary rhetoric: A reader's coursebook, Edited by: Ehninger, D., 218–224. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
4. 1963. College Composition and Communication, October
5. Brummett, B., 1984. Rhetorical theory as heuristic and moral: A pedagogical justification. Communication Education, 33: 97–107.
6. Hart, R. P., 1976. Theory‐building and rhetorical criticism: An informal statement of opinion. Central States Speech Journal, 27: 70–77.
7. Rawlins, W., The Role of Communication Studies in Mentoring Graduate Student Scholars.”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Central States Communication Association. Milwaukee, WI. April.