Class Action Litigation: Communicating with the Public and Class Members

Employee Relations Law Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 83-96

  Mishkind, Charles S ^a   Haddad, Yvonne R ^a  

^a Detroit and Grand Rapids Offices ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542637300     PISSN: 00988898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. See, e.g., the Publix, State Farm, Home Depot, Lucky Stores, Martin-Marletta, Honda, and Dominick lawsuits. The low point for EEOC-initiated representative class actions was fiscal year 1992, when only 47 were filed. By contrast, in the first half of fiscal year 1997, EEOC filed 30 class actions. N. Kreiter, Reinventing the EEOC: Barriers to Enforcement, Daily Lab. Rep. (BNA) E-7 (July 24, 1997). The high point for such suits was fiscal year 1980 when 218 EEOC class actions were filed. Id. at 218.
2. National Enforcement Plan, republished in Daily Lab. Rep. D-20 (Feb. 8, 1996).
3. EEOC: General Counsel Stewart Predicts More Litigation, Class Cases from Agency, Daily Lab. Rep. C-l (Apr. 1, 1997).
4. E.g., Williams v. United States District Court, 658 F.2d 430 (6th Cir. 1980), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 1128 (1981).
5. Newberg on Class Actions §15.09.
6. Domingo v. New England Fish Co., 727 F.2d 1429 (9th Cir. 1984).
7. Williams v. United States District Court, 658 F.2d 430 (6th Cir. 1981).
8. Newberg on Class Actions §15.06.
9. Id. at §15.10.
10. Id. at §15.14 and Winfield v. St. Joe Paper Co., 20 FEP 1093 (N.D. Fla. 1977).
11. Kleiner v. First National Bank of Atlanta, 751 F.2d 1193 (11th Cir. 1985).