Comprehension instruction for socioculturally diverse classrooms: A review of what we know

Reading Teacher

Volumn 57, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 648-658

  Hammerberg, Dawnene D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542597110     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Adams, M.J. (1996). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Afflerbach, P.P., & Johnston, P.H. (1986). What do expert readers do when the main idea is not explicit? In J.F. Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (pp. 49-72). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
3. Anderson, R.C., & Pearson, P.D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York: Longman.
4. Andre, M.E., & Anderson, T.H. (1979). The development and the evaluation of a self-questioning study technique. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 605-623.
5. Au, K.H. (1990). Changes in a teacher's view of interactive comprehension instruction. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 271-286). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Au, K.H. (1993). Literacy instruction in multicultural settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
7. Baumann, J.F. (1986). The direct instruction of main idea comprehension ability. In J.F. Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (pp. 133-178). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
8. Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., Hamilton, R.L., & Kucan, L. (1997). Questioning the author: An approach for enhancing student engagement with text. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
9. Block, C.C., & Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: Guilford.
10. Brown, A.L., Day, J.D., & Jones, E.S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968-979.
11. Brown, A.L., & Palincsar, A.S. (1985). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program to enhance learning (Tech. Rep. No. 334). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Center for the Study of Reading.
12. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Cazden, C.B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14. Clay, M. (1993). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
15. Cook-Gumperz, J. (Ed.). (1986). The social construction of literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Doctorow, M., Wittrock, M.C., & Marks, C. (1978). Generative processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 109-118.
17. Duffy, G.G., & Roehler, L.R. (1989). Modeling mental processes helps poor readers become strategic readers. The Reading Teacher, 41, 481-533.
18. Erickson, F. (1984). School literacy, reasoning, and civility: An anthropologist's perspective. Review of Educational Research, 54, 525-545.
19. Ferdman, B.M. (1991). Literacy and cultural identity. In M. Minami & B.P. Kennedy (Eds.), Language issues in literacy and bilingual/multicultural classrooms (pp. 347-390). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Flavell, J.H. (1977). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Flood, J., Lapp, D., & Bayles-Martin, D. (2000). Vision possible: The role of visual media in literacy education. In M.A. Gallego & S. Hollingsworth (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 62-84). New York: Teachers College Press.
22. Fountas, I., & Pinnell, G.S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
23. Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
24. Gee, J.P. (1992). Socio-cultural approaches to literacy (literacies). Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 31-48.
25. Gee, J.P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
26. Goodman, K.S. (1982). Language and literacy: The selected writings of Kenneth S. Goodman (F.V. Gollasch, Ed.). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
27. Goodman, Y. (1976). Strategies for comprehension. In P.D. Allen & D. Watson (Eds.), Findings of research in miscue analysis: Classroom implications (pp. 94-102). Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills & National Council of Teachers of English.
28. Goodman, Y.M., & Goodman, K.S. (1990). Vygotsky in a whole language perspective. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 223-250). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Gordon, C.J., & Pearson, P.D. (1983). The effects of instruction on metacomprehension and inferencing on children's comprehension abilities (Tech. Rep. No. 227). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Center for the Study of Reading.
30. Gough, P.B. (1984). Word recognition. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 225-254). New York: Longman.
31. Green, J., & Dixon, C. (1996). Language of literacy dialogues: Facing the future or reproducing the past. Journal of Literacy Research, 28, 290-301.
32. Hammerberg, D.D. (2001). Reading and writing hypertextually: Children's literature, technology, and early writing instruction. Language Arts, 78, 207-216.
33. Hammerberg, D.D. (2003). Technologies of the self in classrooms designed as "learning environments": (Im)possible ways of being in early literacy instruction. In B.M. Baker & K. Heyning (Eds.), Dangerous coagulations? The uses of Foucault in the study of education (pp. 359-382). New York: Peter Lang.
34. Hammerberg, D.D., & Grant, C. (2001). Monocultural literacy: The power of print, pedagogy, and epistemological blindness. In P.R. Schmidt & P.B. Mosenthal (Eds.), Advances in reading/language research, vol. 9: Reconceptualizing literacy in the new age of pluralism and multiculturalism (pp. 65-88). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
35. Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
36. Heath, S. (1983). Ways with words. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Heath, S. (1986). Sociocultural contexts of language development. In Beyond language: Social and cultural factors in schooling language minority children (pp. 143-186). Los Angeles: Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center, California State University.
38. Keene, E.O., & Zimmermann, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension in a reader's workshop. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
39. Kress, G. (1998). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication: The potentials of new forms of text. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 53-79). New York: Routledge.
40. Ladson-Billings, G. (2000). Reading between the lines and beyond the pages: A culturally relevant approach to literacy teaching. In M.A. Gallego & S. Hollingsworth (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 139-152). New York: Teachers College Press.
41. Learning First Alliance. (1998). Every child reading: An action plan. Retrieved November 20, 1999, from http//www.learningfirst.org/publications.html.
42. Leland, C.H., Harste, J.C., & Helt, C. (2000). Multiple ways of knowing: Lessons from a blue guitar. In M.A. Gallego & S. Hollingsworth (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 106-117). New York: Teachers College Press.
43. Levin, J.R. (1973). Inducing comprehension in poor readers: A test of a recent model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 19-24.
44. Levin, J.R., & Pressley, M. (1981). Improving children's prose comprehension: Selected strategies that seem to succeed. In C.M. Santa & B.L. Hayes (Eds.), Children's prose comprehension: Research and practice (pp. 44-71). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
45. Mandler, J.M. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Manzo, A.V. (1969). The request procedure. Journal of Reading, 11, 123-126.
47. McGuiness, D. (1997). Why our children can't read and what we can do about It: A scientific revolution in reading. New York: Simon & Schuster.
48. McLaughlin, D. (1989). The sociolinguistics of Navajo literacy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 20, 275-290.
49. Moll, L (1992). Literacy research in community and classrooms: A sociocultural approach. In R. Beach, J.L. Green, M.L. Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 211-244). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
50. Myers, J., Hammett, R., & McKillop, A.M. (2000). Connecting, exploring, and exposing the self in hypermedia projects. In M.A. Gallego & S. Hollingsworth (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 85-105). New York: Teachers College Press.
51. National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). The condition of education, 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
52. National Council of Teachers of English & International Reading Association. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Urbana, IL: Authors.
53. Ogle, D. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 564-570.
54. Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
55. Paris, S.G., Lipson, M.Y., & Wixson, K.K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.
56. Pearson, P.D., Roehler, L.R., Dole, J.A., & Duffy, G.G. (1992). Developing expertise in reading comprehension. In J. Samuels & A. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 145-199). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
57. Pérez, B. (1998). Sociocultural contexts of language and literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Popkewitz, T.S. (1998). Struggling for the soul: The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.
59. Pressley, M. (1976). Mental imagery helps eight-year-olds remember what they read. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 355-359.
60. Pressley, M. (1998). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford.
61. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Arlington, VA: RAND.
62. Raphael, T.E. (1986). Teaching question-answer relationships, revisited. The Reading Teacher, 39, 516-622.
63. Richek, M.A., Caldwell, J.S., Jennings, J.H., & Lerner, J.W. (1996). Reading problems: Assessment and teaching strategies. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
64. Roehler, L.R., & Duffy, G.G. (1984). Direct explanation of comprehension processes. In G.G. Duffy, L.R. Roehler, & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 256-280). New York: Longman.
65. Rosenblatt, L.M. (1938). Literature as experience. New York: Progressive Education Association.
66. Rosenblatt, L.M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
67. Rumelhart, D.E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 573-603). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. Rumelhart, D.E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce, & W.F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70. Short, K.G., & Kaufmann, G. (2000). Exploring sign systems within an inquiry system. In M.A. Gallego & S. Hollingsworth (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 42-61). New York: Teachers College Press.
71. Singer, H. (1978). Active comprehension: From asking to answering questions. The Reading Teacher, 31, 901-908.
72. Street, B.V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
73. Street, B.V. (1993). The new literacy studies. In B. Street (Ed.), Cross-cultural approaches to literacy (pp. 1-21). London: Cambridge University Press.
74. Taylor, B.M. (1982). Text structure and children's comprehension and memory for expository material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 323-340.
75. Tierney, R.J., & Cunningham, J.W. (1984). Research on teaching reading comprehension. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 609-658). White Plains, NY: Longman.
76. Vacca, R.T., & Vacca, J.L. (1999). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum (6th ed.). New York: Longman.
77. Van Allen, R. (1976). Language experiences in education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
78. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79. Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80. Weaver, C. (1994). Reading process and practice: From socio-psycholinguistics to whole language. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
81. Winograd, P.N., & Bridge, C.A. (1986). The comprehension of important information in written prose. In J.F. Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (pp. 18-48). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.