Hysteroscopic training: The butternut pumpkin model

Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 256-261

  Kingston, Ashley ^a,b   Abbott, Jason ^a   Lenart, Meg ^a   Vancaillie, Thierry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b ROYAL HOSPITAL FOR WOMEN   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ELECTROSURGERY; ENDOMETRIUM; EYE HAND COORDINATION; HYSTEROSCOPY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MODEL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SAFETY; SIMULATION; SKILL;

EID: 2542593276     PISSN: 10743804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60210-1     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Hill D, Maher P, Wood C, et al: Complications of operative hysteroscopy. Gynaecol Endosc 1992, 1:185-9.
2. Macdonald R, Phipps J, Singer A: Endometrial ablation: A safe procedure. Gynaecol Endosc 1992, 1:7-9.
3. Limbs and Things. Accessed at www.limbsandthings.com.
4. Satava R: Dawning of the next generation surgical education. Surg Endosc 2001, 15:232-41.
5. Paisley A, Baldwin P, Paterson-Brown S: Validity of surgical simulation for the assessment of operative skill. Br J Surg 2001, 88:1525-32.
6. Ahlberg G, Heikkinen T, Iselius L, et al: Does training in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance? Surg Endosc 2002, 16:126-9.
7. Rosen J, Hannaford B, Richards C, et al: Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2001, 48 5:579-91.
8. Dunkley M, Brown L, Robinson J, et al: Initial training model for endometrial ablation. Gynaecol Endosc 2001, 10:355-60.