Can prostate biopsies predict suitability for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy?

Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 216-220

  Connolly, Stephen S ^a   O'Malley, Kiaran J ^a   O'Brien, Anne ^a   Kelly, Daniel G ^a   Mulvin, David W ^a   Quinlan, David M ^a  

^a ST VINCENT S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CARCINOMA; PROSTATECTOMY; RELIABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 2542583861     PISSN: 00365599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00365590310006237     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Walsh PC. Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ, eds. Campbell's urology, 7th edn., Vol. III. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1998: 2565-88.
2. Steiner MS. Current results and patient selection for nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Semin Urol Oncol 1995; 13: 204-14.
3. Catalona WJ. Patient selection for, results of, and impact on tumor resection of potency-sparing radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 1990; 17: 819-26.
4. Graefen M, Hammerer P, Michl U, Noldus J, Haese A, Henke RP, et al. Incidence of positive surgical margins after biopsy-selected nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Urology 1998; 51: 437-42.
5. Huland H, Hubner D, Henke RP. Systematic biopsies and digital rectal examination to identify the nerve-sparing side for radical prostatectomy without risk of positive margin in patients with clinical stage T2, N0 prostatic carcinoma. Urology 1994; 44: 211-4.
6. Sanwick JM, Dalkin BL, Nagle RB. Accuracy of prostate needle biopsy in predicting extracapsular extension at radical prostatectomy: application in selecting patients for nerve-sparing surgery. Urology 1998; 52: 814-9.
7. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989; 142: 71-4.
8. Rosai J. Guidelines for handling of most common and important surgical specimens. Prostate gland - radical prostatectomy for tumor. In: Rosai J. ed. Ackerman's surgical pathology, 8th edn., Vol. II. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 1996: 2699.
9. Catalona WJ, Ramos CG, Carvalhal GF. Contemporary results of anatomic radical prostatectomy. CA Cancer J Clin 1999; 49: 282-96.
10. Lepor H, Gregerman M, Crosby R, Mostofi FK, Walsh PC. Precise localization of the autonomic nerves from the pelvic plexus to the corpora cavernosa: a detailed anatomical study of the adult male pelvis. J Urol 1985; 133: 207-12.
11. Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982; 128: 492-7.
12. Quinlan DM, Epstein JI, Carter BS, Walsh PC. Sexual function following radical prostatectomy: influence of preservation of neurovascular bundles. J Urol 1991; 145: 998-1002.
13. Rosen MA, Goldstone L, Lapin S, Wheeler T, Scardino PT. Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 1992; 148: 331-7.
14. Catalona WJ, Bigg SW. Nerve-sparing prostatectomy: evaluation of results after 250 patients. J Urol 1990; 143: 538-43.
15. Bostwick DG, Shan A, Qian J, Darson M, Maihle NJ, Jenkins RB, et al. Independent origin of multiple foci of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: comparison with matched foci of prostate carcinoma. Cancer 1998; 83: 1995-2002.
16. Epstein JI, Carmichael MJ, Partin AW, Walsh PC. Small high grade adenocarcinoma of the prostate in radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens performed for non-palpable disease: pathogenetic and clinical implications. J Urol 1994; 151: 1587-92.
17. Wise AM, Stamey TA, McNeal JE, Clayton JL. Morphologic and clinical significance of multifocal prostate cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 2002; 60: 264-9.
18. Watson RB, Civantos F, Soloway MS. Positive surgical margins with radical prostatectomy: detailed pathological analysis and prognosis. Urology 1996; 48: 80-90.
19. Epstein JI, Pizov G, Walsh PC. Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 1993; 71: 3582-93.
20. Wahle S, Reznicek M, Fallon B, Platz C, Williams R. Incidence of surgical margin involvement in various forms of radical prostatectomy. Urology 1990; 36: 23-6.
21. Epstein JI, Carmichael MJ, Pizov G, Walsh PC. Influence of capsular penetration on progression following radical prostatectomy: a study of 196 cases with long-term followup. J Urol 1993; 150: 135-41.
22. Danziger M, Shevchuk M, Antonescu C, Matthews GJ, Fracchia JA. Predictive accuracy of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: correlations to matched prostatectomy specimens. Urology 1997; 49: 863-7.
23. Iczkowski KA, Bostwick DG. Prostate biopsy interpretation: current concepts, 1999. Urol Clin North Am 1999; 26: 435-52.
24. Klein EA, Zippe CD. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy - defining a new standard [Editorial]. J Urol 2000; 163: 179-80.
25. Daniels GF, Jr, McNeal JE, Stamey TA. Predictive value of contralateral biopsies in unilaterally palpable prostate cancer. J Urol 1992; 147: 870-4.
26. Dietrick DD, McNeal JE, Stamey TA. Core cancer length in ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsies: a preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer volume. Urology 1995; 45: 987-92.
27. Loch T, McNeal JE, Stamey TA. Interpretation of bilateral positive biopsies in prostate cancer. J Urol 1995; 154: 1078-83.
28. Sebo TJ, Bock BJ, Cheville JC, Lohse C, Wollan P, Zincke H. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2000; 163: 174-8.
29. Tigrani VS, Bhargava V, Shinohara K, Presti JC. Number of positive systematic sextant biopsies predicts surgical margin status at radical prostatectomy. Urology 1999; 54: 689-93.
30. Durkan GC, Greene DR. Diagnostic dilemmas in detection of prostate cancer in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2000; 3: 13-20.
31. Applewhite JC, Matlaga BR, McCullough DL, Hall MC. Transrectal ultrasound and biopsy in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Cancer Control 2001; 8: 141-50.
32. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997; 157: 199-202.
33. Djaven B, Remzi M, Schulman CC, Marberger M, Zlotta AR. Repeat prostate biopsy: who, how and when? A review. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 93-103.
34. Letran JL, Meyer GE, Loberiza FR, Brawer MK. The effect of prostate volume on the yield of needle biopsy. J Urol 1998; 160: 1718-21.