Exploring the underlying dimensions of coping: A concept mapping approach

Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 155-171

  Gol, Andrew R ^a   Cook, Stephen W ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542582396     PISSN: 07367236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/jscp.23.2.155.31021     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alberti, R. E., & Emmons, M. L. (1986). Your perfect right: A guide to assertive living. San Luis Obispo, CA: Impact.
2. Aldwin, C. M. (1994). Stress, coping, and development: An integrative perspective. New York: Guilford.
3. Amirkhan, J. H. (1990). A factor analytically derived measure of coping: The coping strategy indicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1066-1074.
4. Athens, S. (1984). Scientific criteria for evaluating qualitative studies. Journal of Symbolic Interactionism, 8, 35-41.
5. Benson, J., & Hagtvet, K. A. (1996). The interplay among design, data analysis, and theory in the measurement of coping. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 83-106). New York: Wiley.
6. Billings, A. G., & Moos, R. H. (1984). Coping, stress, and social resources among adults with unipolar depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 877-891.
7. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. P., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283.
8. Chang, E. C., & Strunk, D. R. (1999). Dysphoria: Relations to appraisals, coping, and adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 99-108.
9. Concept Systems, Inc. (n.d.). Multidimensional scaling. Retrieved December 2002, from http://www.conceptsystems.com/kb/00000038.htm
10. Cook, S. W., & Heppner, P. P. (1997). A psychometric study of three coping measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 906-923.
11. Costa, P. T., Jr., Somerfield, M. R., & McCrae, R. R. (1996). Personality and coping: A reconceptualization. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 44-61). New York: Wiley.
12. Coyne, J. C., & Racioppo, M. W. (2000). Never the twain shall meet? Closing the gap between coping research and clinical intervention research. American Psychologist, 55, 655-664.
13. Daughtry, D., & Kunkel, M. A. (1993). Experience of depression in college students: A concept map. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 316-323.
14. Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1990b). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844-854.
15. Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. ( 1994). Assessment of multidimensional coping: Task, emotion, and avoidance strategies. Psychological Assessment, 6, 50-60.
16. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150-170.
17. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Manual for the Ways of Coping. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
18. Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Klein, C. D. (2000). Testing the theoretical models of the relations between social support, coping, and adjustment to stressful life events. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 314-335.
19. Giorgi, A. (1985). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 12-28). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University.
20. Heppner, P. P. (1988). The problem solving inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
21. Heppner, P. P., Cook, S. W., Wright, D. M., & Johnson, W. C., Jr. (1995). Progress in resolving problems: A problem-focused style of coping. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 279-293.
22. Heppner, P. P., & Krauskopf, C. J. (1987). An information-processing approach to personal problem solving. The Counseling Psychologist, 15, 371-447.
23. Holahan, C. J., Moos, R. H., & Schaefer, J. A. (1996). Coping, stress resistance, and growth: Conceptualizing adaptive functioning. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 24-43). New York: Wiley.
24. Ilfeld, F. W. (1980). Coping styles of Chicago adults: Description. Journal of Human Stress, 37, 2-10.
25. Krohne, H. W. (1993). Attention and Avoidance: Strategies in coping with aversiveness. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
26. Krohne, H. W. (1996). Individual differences in coping. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 381-409). New York: Wiley.
27. Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28. Kunkel, M. A., & Newsom, S. (1996). Presenting problems for mental health services: A concept map. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 18, 53-63.
29. Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 234-247.
30. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
31. Moos, R. H. (1995). Development and applications of new measures of life stressors, social resources, and coping responses. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 1-13.
32. Parker, J. D. A., Endler, N. S., & Bagby, M. (1993). If it changes, it might be unstable: Examining the factor structure of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 5, 361-368.
33. Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2-21.
34. Porter, L. S., & Stone, A. A. (1996). An approach to assessing daily coping. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 133-150). New York: Wiley.
35. Rosenberg, S., & Kim, M. (1975). The method of sorting as a data-gathering procedure in multivariate research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10, 489-502.
36. Roth, S., & Cohen, L. J. (1986). Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American Psychologist, 41, 813-819.
37. Schiffman, S. S., Reynolds, M. L., & Young, F. W. (1981). Introduction to multidimensional scaling. New York: Academic Press.
38. Snyder, C. R., & Pulvers, K. M. (2001). Dr. Seuss, the coping machine, and "Oh the places you'll go." In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping with stress: Effective people and processes (pp. 3-29). New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Stanton, A. L., Danoff-Burg, S., Cameron, C. L., Bishop, M., Collins, C. A., Kirk, S. B., Sworowski, L. A., & Twillman, R. (2000). Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 875-882.
40. Stanton, A. L., Danoff-Burg, S., Cameron, C. L., & Ellis, A. P. (1994). Coping through emotional approach: Problems of conceptualization and confunding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 350-362.
41. Stanton, A. L., & Franz, R. (1999). Focusing on emotion: An adaptive coping strategy? In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping: The psychology of what works (pp. 90-118). New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Stanton, A. L., Kirk, S. B., Cameron, C. L., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2000). Coping through emotional approach: Scale construction and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1150-1169.
43. Stone, A. A., Greenberg, M. A., Kennedy-Moore, E., & Newman, M. G. (1991). Self-report, situation-specific coping questionnaires: What are they measuring? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 648-658.
44. Stone, A. A., & Kennedy-Moore, E. (1992). Commentary to part three: Assessing situational coping: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), Hostility, coping, and health (pp. 203-214). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45. Stone, A. A., Kennedy-Moore, E., Newman, M. G., Greenberg, M., & Neale, J. M. (1992). Conceptual and methodological issues in current coping assessments. In B. N. Carpenter (Ed.) Personal coping: Theory, research and application (pp. 15-29). Westport, CT: Praeger.
46. Suls, J., & Fletcher, B. (1985). The relative efficacy of avoidance and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 4, 249-288.
47. Tobin, D. L., Holroyd, K. A., Reynolds, R. V., & Wigal, J. K. (1989). The hierarchical factor structure of the Coping Strategies Inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 13, 343-361.
48. Trochim, W. M. K. (1989a). Concept mapping: Soft science or hard art? Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 87-110.
49. Trochim, W. M. K. (1989b). The concept system [Computer program]. Ithaca, NY: Concept Systems.
50. Trochim, W. M. K. (1989c). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 1-16.
51. Trochim, W. M. K., Cook, J. A., Setze, R. J. (1994). Using concept mapping to develop a conceptual framework of staff's views of a supported employment program for individuals with severe mental illness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 766-775.
52. Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236-244.