On the boundary conditions for EG methods applied to the two-dimensional wave equation system

ZAMM Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 237-251

  Lukacova Medvid'ova, M ^a,b   Warnecke, G ^b   Zahaykah, Y ^b  

^a HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Absorbing boundary conditions; Evolution Galerkin schemes; Hyperbolic systems; Laplace transformation; Perfectly matched layer; Reflecting boundary conditions; Wave equation

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542560593     PISSN: 00442267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/zamm.200310103     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. J.-P. Bérenger, A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves, J. Comput. Phys. 114, 185-200 (1994).
2. A. Bradly, L. Greengard, and T. Hagstrom, Nonreflecting boundary conditions for the time-dependent wave equation, J. Comput. Phys. 180(1), 270-296 (2000).
3. B. Engquist and A. Majda, Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves, Math. Comput. 31(139), 629-651 (1977).
4. M. J. Grote, Nonreflecting Boundary Conditions for Time Dependent Wave Propagation, Research report No. 2000-04, Seminar für Angewandte Mathematik (SAM), Zürich (2000).
5. M. J. Grote and J. B. Keller, Exact nonreflecting boundary conditions for the time dependent wave equation, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 55(2), 280-297 (1995).
6. M. J. Grote and J. B. Keller, Nonreflecting boundary conditions for time-dependent scattering, J. Comput. Phys. 127, 52-65 (1996).
7. M. J. Grote and J. B. Keller, Nonreflecting boundary conditions for Maxwell's equations, J. Comput. Phys. 139, 327-342 (1998).
8. G. W. Hedstrom, Nonreflecting boundary conditions for nonlinear hyperbolic sytems, J. Comput. Phys. 30, 222-237 (1979).
9. R. L. Higdon, Numerical absorbing boundary conditions for the wave equation, Math. Comput. 49(179), 60-90 (1987).
10. R. Holland and J. W. Williams, Total-field versus scattered-field finite-difference codes: A comparative assessment, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 30(6), 4583-4588 (1983).
11. Fang Q. Hu, On absorbing boundary conditions for linearized Euler equations by a perfectly matched layer, J. Comput. Phys. 129, 201-219 (1996).
12. M. Lukáčová, K. W. Morton, and G. Warnecke, Finite volume evolution Galerkin methods for Euler equations of gas dynamics, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 40(3-4), 425-434 (2002).
13. M. Lukáčová, K. W. Morton, and G. Warnecke, Evolution Galerkin methods for hyperbolic systems in two space dimensions, Math. Comput. 69(232), 1355-1384 (2000).
14. M. Lukáčová, J. Saibertová, G. Warnecke, and Y. Zahaykah, On evolution Galerkin methods for the Maxwell and the linearized Euler equations, Appl. Math. (to appear).
15. M. Lukáčová, G. Warnecke, and Y. Zahaykah, Third order finite volume evolution Galerkin (FVEG) methods for two-dimensional wave equation system, East-West J. Numer. Math. (to appear).
16. G. Mur, Absorbing boundary conditions for finite-difference approximation of the time-domain electromagnetic field equations, IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. EMC-23(4), 377-382 (1981).
17. S. Ostkamp, Multidimensional characteristic Galerkin schemes and evolution operators for hyperbolic systems, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 20, 1111-1125 (1997).
18. Quan Qi and T. L. Geers, Evolution of the perfectly matched layer for computational acoustics, J. Comput. Phys. 139, 166-183 (1998).
19. K. W. Thompson, Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems, J. Comput. Phys. 68, 1-24 (1987).
20. K. W. Thompson, Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems, II, J. Comput. Phys. 89, 439-461 (1990).