The Kaiserslautern multiscale geopotential model SWITCH-03 from orbit perturbations of the satellite CHAMP and its comparison to the models EGM96, UCPH20025, EIGEN-1s and EIGEN-2

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 157, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 499-514

  Fengler, M J ^a   Freeden, W ^a   Michel, V ^a  

^a University of Koblenz Landau   (Germany)

Author keywords

CHAMP post processed science orbit data; Regional gravitational field recovery; Spherical splines; Tikhonov wavelet regularization

Indexed keywords

GEODESY; GEOPOTENTIAL; GPS; ORBIT DETERMINATION; SATELLITE;

EID: 2542551189     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02209.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ahlberg, J.H., Nilson, E.N. & Walsh, J.L., 1967. The Theory of Splines and Their Application. Academic Press, New York.
2. Anderson, E. et al., 1992. LAPACK Users' Guide, Release 1.0, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.
3. Austen, G. & Reubelt, T., 2000. Spatial gravity field analysis using semi-continuous ephemerides of low-orbiting GPS-tracked satellites of type CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE, Diplomarbeit, Geodätisches Institut, Universität Stuttgart.
4. Balmino, G. & Barriot, J.P., 1989. Study on precise gravity field determination methods and mission requirements, Final Report, ESA 7521/87/F/FL, Workpackage 221: Revision of Numerical Techniques,
5. Barlier, F. et al., 2000. A new global Earth's gravity field model from satellite orbit perturbations: GRIM5-S1, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3611-3614.
6. Blackford, L.S. et al., 1997. ScaLAPACK Users' Guide, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.
7. Coifman, R.R. & Donoho, D.L., 1995. Translation-Invariant De-Noising, Yale University and Stanford University, Proceedings of the 15th French-Belgian meeting of statisticians, New York, Springer.
8. Daubechies, I., 1988. Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets, Comm. Pure appl. Math., 41, 909-996.
9. Driscoll, J.R. & Healy, D.M., 1994. Computing Fourier transforms and convolutions on the 2-sphere, Adv. Appl. Math., 15, 202-250.
10. Engeln-Müllges, G. & Reutter, F., 1988. Numerik-Algorithmen mit ANSI C-Programmen, BI-Wiss. Verlag, Mannheim.
11. Fengler, M.J., 2002. Multiscale modeling of the Earth's gravitational potential from discrete noisy CHAMP ephemerides, Diploma thesis, Geomathematics Group, Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautern.
12. Freeden, W., 1981a. On approximation by harmonic splines, Manuscr. Geod., 6, 193-244.
13. Freeden, W., 1981b. On spherical spline interpolation and approximation, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 3, 551-575.
14. Freeden, W., 1983. Least square approximation by linear combinations of (multi)poles, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying Report 344,
15. Freeden, W., 1999. Multiscale Modelling of Spaceborne Geodata, Teubner Verlag, Stuttgart.
16. Freeden, W. & Hesse K., 2002. Spline modelling of geostrophic flow: theoretical and algorithmic aspects, Report 250, Geomathematics Group, University of Kaiserslautern.
17. Freeden, W. & Michel, V., 1999. Constructive approximation and numerical methods in geodetic research today-an attempt at a categorization based on an uncertainty principle, J. Geodesy, 73, 452-465.
18. Freeden, W., Schreiner, M. & Franke, R., 1997. A survey on spherical spline approximation, Surv. Math. Ind., 7, 29-85.
19. Freeden, W., Gervens, T. & Schreiner, M., 1998. Constructive Approximation on the Sphere (with Applications to Geomathematics), Clarendon Press, Oxford.
20. Freeden, W., Glockner, O. & Thalhammer, M., 1999. Multiscale gravitational field recovery from GPS-satellite-to-satellite tracking, Stud. Geophys. Geodaetica, 43, 229-264.
21. Freeden, W., Michel, V. & Nutz, H., 2002. Satellite-to-satellite tracking and satellite gravity gradiometry (advanced techniques for high-resolution geopotential field determination), J. Eng. Math., 43, 19-56.
22. Glockner, O., 2001. On numerical aspects of gravitational field modelling from SST and SGG by harmonic splines and wavelets, PhD thesis, Geomathematics Group, University of Kaiserslautern, Shaker Verlag, Aachen.
23. Grafarend, E. & Shen, Y.Z., 2000. Study and simulation of recovering the gravitational potential model from the ephemerides of CHAMP. preprint.
24. Green, P.J. & Silvermann B.W., 1994. Nonparametric Regression and Generalized Linear Models, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 58. Chapman & Hall, London.
25. Gutting, M., 2002. Multiscale gravitational field modelling from oblique derivatives, Diploma thesis, Geomathematics Group, Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautern.
26. Gropp, W., Lusk, E. & Skjellum, A., 1999. Using MPI-Portable Parallel Programming with the Message-Passing Interface, 2nd edn, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
27. Han, S.-C., Jekeli, C. & Shum C.K., 2002. Efficient gravity field recovery using in situ disturbing potential observables from CHAMP, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 10.1029/2002GL015180.
28. Jekeli C., 1999. The determination of gravitational potential differences from satellite-to-satellite tracking, Cel. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 75, 85-101.
29. Kellogg, O.D., 1929. Foundations, in Potential Theory, Frederick Ungar Publishing Company.
30. Kusche, J., 2002. Inverse Probleme bei der Gravitationsfeldbestimmung mittels SST- und SGG-Satellitenmissionen, Habilitationsschrift, Fachgebiet Geodäsie, Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn.
31. Kusche, J. & van Loon J., 2003. Statistical assessment of CHAMP data and models using the energy balance approach, 2nd CHAMP Science Meeting at the GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (GFZ).
32. Lawton, W.M., 1991. Necessary and sufficient conditions for constructing orthonormal wavelet bases, J. Math. Phys., 32, 1, 57-61.
33. Lemoine, F.G. et al., 1998. The development of the joint NASA GSFC and NIMA geopotential model EGM96, NASA/TP-1998-206861, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD.
34. Mallat, S., 1999. A Wavelettour of Signal Processing, Academic Press, New York.
35. Michel, D., 2001. On the combination of harmonic splines and fast multipole methods for CHAMP data modelling, Diploma thesis. Geomathematics Group, Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautern.
36. Moritz, H., 1980. Advanced Physical Geodesy, H. Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe.
37. Müller, C., 1966. Spherical Harmonics, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 17, Springer, Berlin.
38. Müller C., 1969. Die Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften in Einzeldarstellungen, [Foundation of the Mathematical Theory of Electromagnetic Waves], Springer, Berlin.
39. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. & Flannery, B.P., 1992. Numerical Recipes in C, The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University press, Cambridge.
40. Reigber, C.H., Bock, R., Förste, C., Grunwaldt, L., Jakowski, N., Lühr, H., Schwintzer, P. & Tilgner, C., 1996. CHAMP-phase B, executive summary, Scientific Technical Report STR96/13, GFZ, Potsdam.
41. Reigber, C.H. et al., 2002. A high quality global gravity field model from CHAMP GPS tracking data and accelerometry (EIGEN-IS), Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(14), 10.1029/2002GL015064.
42. Reigber, C.H. et al., 2002. The CHAMP-only EIGEN-2 Earth gravity field model, Adv. Space Res., submitted.
43. Reubelt, T., Austen, G. & Grafarend, E. W., 2003. Harmonic analysis of the Earth's gravitational field by means of semi-continuous ephemeris of a low Earth orbiting (LEO) GPS-tracked satellite-case study CHAMP, J. Geodesy, 77, 257-278.
44. Reuter, R., 1982, Über Integralformeln der Einheitssphäre and harmonische Splinefunktionen, Geodetic Institute, Rheinisch' Westfälischce technische Hochschule, Aachen.
45. Schwarz, H. R., 1997. Numerische Mathematik, Teubner, Stuttgart.
46. Schwintzer, P., 2002. EIGEN-IS: first Earth gravity field model including CHAMP tracking data, http://op.gfz-potsdam.dc/champ/results/ index_RESULTS.html
47. Schwintzer, P., 2003. Private communication.
48. Stenseng, L. & Tscherning, C.C., 2003. SAGRADA-SAtellite GRAvity Data Analysis, http://www.gfy.ku.dk/stenseng/sagrada.php.
49. Stockis, J.-P., 2001. On time series, Lecture Notes, Department of Statistics, University of Kaiserslautern.
50. Sweldens, W. & Jawerth, B., 1994. An overview of wavelet based multiresolution analyses, SIAM Rev., 36(3), 377-412.
51. van de Geijn, R. A., 1997. Using PLAPACK, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
52. Werner, J., 1992. Numerische Mathematik I, Vieweg Studium Verlag, Braunschweig.