Effectiveness of provision of outdoor mobility services and devices in the Netherlands

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 371-378

  Wessels, Roelof D ^a   de Witte, L P ^a   Jedeloo, S ^a   van den Heuvel, W P M ^a   van den Heuvel, W J A ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR REHABILITATION RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEVICE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT MOBILITY; PATIENT TRANSPORT; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; RATING SCALE; SELF CARE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR VEHICLES; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; NETHERLANDS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; TRANSPORTATION OF PATIENTS; WHEELCHAIRS;

EID: 2542548821     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr755oa     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. The Dutch Lower House. Text of the Disability Service Act. Staatsblad 545, 1993 's-Gravenhage.
2. Wessels R, Witte L de, Andrich R et al. A user-centred approach to assess effectiveness of assistive technology provision. Technol Disabil 2000; 13: 105-15.
3. Wessels R. IPPA: Individually prioritised problem assessment. In: Marincek C et al. eds. Assistive technology - added value to the quality of life. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2001: 598-99.
4. World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. Geneva: WHO, 2001.
5. Jedeloo S, Witte LP de, Schrijvers AJP. A user-centred approach to assess the effectiveness of outdoor mobility devices and services. Int J Rehabil Res 2002: 25: 137-41.
6. Persson J, Hellbom G, Oberg B et al. Efficiency of Assistive Technology and Services, Final Report. DE3101 EATS, Telematics Application Programme, Sector Disabled and Elderly. CMT, Linkoping, Sweden, 2000.
7. Wessels R, Persson J, Lorentsen O et al. IPPA: Individually prioritized problem assessment. Technol Disabil 2002; 14: 141-45.
8. Witte L de, Gelderblom G, Soest K van et al. MANUS: een helpende hand; Een verkennende studie naar doelgroepen, indicatiecriteria, gebruik en aspecten van kosten-effectiviteit van de MANUS robotarm. IRv, Hoensbroek, the Netherlands, 2000.
9. Götherström U, Persson J. Text telephone relay service and video phone relay service - quantification of benefits for the user. In: Marincek et al. eds. Assistive technology - added value to the quality of life. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2001: 575-79.
10. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1997.
11. Middel B, Stewart R, Bouma J, Sonderen E van, Heuvel WJ A van den. How to validate clinically important change in health-related functional status. Is the magnitude of the effect size consistently related to magnitude of change as indicated by a global question rating? J Eval Clin Pract 2001; 7: 399-410.