Mathematical equity underachieving boys or sacrificial girls?

International Journal of Inclusive Education

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 119-134

  Boaler, Jo ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542532933     PISSN: 13603116     EISSN: 14645173     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1360311980020203     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adey, P., Fairbrother, R., Johnson, B. and Jones, C. (1995) A review of research related to learning styles and strategies. Unpublished report prepared for OFSTED, London
2. Barber, M. (1994) Report into school students' attitudes. The Guardian, 23 August, p. 2
3. Becker, J.R. (1995) Women's ways of knowing in mathematics. In P. Rogers and G. Kaiser (eds), Equity in Mathematics Education: Influences of Feminism and Culture (London: Falmer), pp. 163-174
4. Bernstein, B. (1975) Class and pedagogies: visible and invisible. In B. Bernstein (ed.), Class, Codes and Control, vol. 3. Towards a Theory of Educational Transmissions (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul), pp. 116-145
5. Bleach, K. (1996) Boys will be boys-but will they be Ssccessful? AllinSuccess, 7(2), 1719
6. Boaler, J. (1997a) Experiencing School Mathematics: Teaching Styles, Sex and Setting (Buckingham: Open University Press)
7. Boaler, J. (1997b) Reclaiming school mathematics: the girls fight back. Gender and Education, 9(3), 285- 306
8. Boaler, J. (1997c) When even the winners are losers: evaluating the experiences of 'top set' students. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(2), 165-182
9. Burton, L. (1986) Femmes et Mathématiques: y-a-t-il une intersection? In L. Lafortune (ed.) 'Femmes et Mathématique, les Éditions du remue-ménage (Montreal: Canada), pp. 19-55
10. Burton, L. (1995) Moving towards a feminist epistemology of mathematics. In P. Rogers and G. Kaiser (eds), Equity in Mathematics Education: Influences of Feminism and Culture (London: Falmer), pp. 209-226
11. Dweck, C.S. (1986) Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist (Special Issue: Psychological science and education), 41(10), 1040-1048
12. Elwood, J. and Comber, C. (1995) Gender differences in 'A' level examinations: the reinforcement of stereotypes. Paper presented at BERA Conference: A New ERA? New contexts for gender equality, University of Bath
13. Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
14. Gipps, C. (1996) What do we mean by equity? In Centre for Research and Education on Gender (ed.), Targeting Under achievement: Boys or Girls? (Institute of Education, London: Centre for Research and Education on Gender), pp. 38
15. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (New York: Aldine)
16. Head, J. (1996) Gender identity and cognitive style. In P. Murphy and C. Gipps (eds), Equity in the Classroom: towards Effective Pedagogy for Girls and Boys, pp. 59-70
17. Huberman, A.M. and Crandall, D.P. (1982) Fitting words to numbers. American Behavioural Scientist, 26(1), 62-83
18. Strauss, A.L. (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
19. Walkerdine, V. and the Girls and Mathematics Unit (eds) (1989) Counting Girls Out (London: Virago)
20. Weiner, G., Arnot, M. and David, M. (19967) Is the future female? Female success, male disadvantage and changing gender patterns in education. In A.H. Halsey, P. Brown and H. Lauder (eds), Education, Economy, Culture and Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press)