Measurements of the flux densities of static magnetic fields generated by two types of dental magnetic attachments and their retentive forces

Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Science)

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 412-415

  Xu, Chun ^a   Chao, Yong Lie ^a   Du, Li ^a   Yang, Ling ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Flux density; Magnetic attachment; Retentive force; Static magnetic field

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; DEVICE; DIGITAL GAUSS METER; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; MEASUREMENT; MOUTH CAVITY; OPEN FIELD BEHAVIOR; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

EID: 2542498979     PISSN: 1672173X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Riley MA, Walmsley AD, Harris IR. Magnets in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent, 2001;86(2):137.
2. Linder-Aronson A, Lindskog S, Rygh P. Orthodontic magnets: effects on gingival epithelium and alveolar bone in monkeys. Eur J Orthod, 1992;14(4):255.
3. Camilleri S, McDonald F. Static magnetic field effects on the sagittal suture in Rattus Norvegicus. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1993;103(3):240.
4. Bondemark L, Kurol J, Larsson A. Human dental pulp and gingival tissue after static magnetic field exposure. Eur J Orthod, 1995;17(2):85.
5. Narra VR, Howell RW, Goddu SM, et al. Effects of a 1.5-Tesla static magnetic field on spermatogenesis and embryogenesis in mice. Invest Radiol, 1996;31(9):586.
6. Wiskirchen J, Gronewaller EF, Heinzelmann F, et al. Human fetal lung fibroblasts: in vitro study of repetitive magnetic field exposure at 0.2, 1.0, and 1.5 T. Radiology, 2000;215(3): 858.
7. Bondemark L, Kurol J, Wisten A. Extent and flux density of static magnetic fields generated by orthodontic samarium-cobalt magnets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1995;107(5):488.
8. Akaltan F, Can G. Retentive characteristics of different dental magnetic systems. J Prosthet Dent, 1995;74(4):422.