Balancing fee and quality in two envelope fee bidding

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 159-175

  Drew, Derek S ^a   Tang, Sandy L Y ^a   Lui, Christine K ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Consultants; Fees

Indexed keywords

ABILITY TESTING; ARCHITECTURE; EMPOWERMENT OF PERSONNEL; ENGINEERS; FEES AND CHARGES; PERSONNEL SELECTION;

CONSULTANTS; INTELLECTUAL SERVICE; TECHNICAL SCORES;

CIVIL ENGINEERING;

EID: 2542496932     PISSN: 09699988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09699980410535778     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Cheng, H.K. (2000), "A paradigm shift: in search of partners to deliver quality public housing", Paper presented in International Conference on Quality Design and Construction, November, Hong Kong Institute of Architects, Hong Kong.
2. CIB (1996), Selecting Consultants for the Team: Balancing Quality and Price, Construction Industry Board, Thomas Telford Publishing, London.
3. CIC (1993), The Procurement of Professional Services: Guidelines for the Application of Competitive Tendering, Construction Industry Council, Thomas Telford Publishing, London.
4. CIC (1994), The Procurement of Professional Services: Guidelines for the Value Assessment of Competitive Tenders, Construction Industry Council, Thomas Telford Publishing, London.
5. CIC (1998), A Guide to Quality based Selection of Consultants: A Key to Design Quality, Construction Industry Council, London.
6. Connaughton, J. (1994), Value by Competition, Construction Industry Research and Information Association, London.
7. CQSA (1992), Fee Competition: Recommendation to Clients, The Consultant Quantity Surveyors Association, London.
8. Drew, D.S., Li, H. and Shen, L.Y. (2000), "Feedback in competitive fee tendering", Journal of Construction Procurement, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 220-30.
9. Drew, D.S., Ho, L.C.Y. and Skitmore, R.M. (2001), "Analysing a consultant's competitiveness in two envelope fee tendering", Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 503-10.
10. Drew, D.S., Tang, S.L.Y. and Lo, H.P. (2002a), "Developing a tendering strategy in two envelope fee tendering based on technical score-fee variability", Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 20, pp. 67-81.
11. Drew, D.S., Lai, P.Y., Li, H. and Lo, H.P. (2002b), "Correcting the fee-technical score variability imbalance in two-envelope fee tendering", Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 20, pp. 157-66.
12. Hoxley, M. (1998), Value for Money? The Impact of Competitive Fee Tendering on Construction Professional Service Quality, The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London.
13. Lam, W.H. (2000), "How best to assess fees from consultants submitted in a tendering process", panel discussion paper presented at the Conference on Quality Agenda for Consultant Selection organised by the Hong Kong Institute of Architects, January.
14. Seeley, I. (1997), Quantity Surveying Practice, Macmillan, Basingstoke.
15. Shostack, G.L. (1981), "How to design a service", in Donnelly, J.H. and George, W.R. (Eds), Marketing of Services, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 221-9.