A promising psychosocial intervention: Next steps include systematic study and creative extension

Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 143-146

  King, Cheryl A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Psychosocial intervention; Written exposure paradigm

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; PSYCHOTRAUMA; REVIEW; SELF DISCLOSURE; SOCIAL ASPECT; THEORY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WRITING;

EID: 2542495161     PISSN: 09695893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/clipsy/bph064     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emergy, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: The Guilford Press.
2. Chambless, D. L., Baker, M. J., Baucom, D. H., Beutler, L. E., Calhoun, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., et al. (1998). Update on empirically validated therapies II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3-16.
3. Chorpita, B. F., Yim, L. M., Donkervoet, J. C., Arensdorf, A., Amundsen, M. J., McGee, C., et al. (2002). Toward large-scale implementation of empirically supported treatments for children: A review and observations by the Hawaii Empirical Basis to Services Task Force. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 165-190.
4. Compas, B. E., Davis, G. E., Forsythe, C. J., & Wagner, B. M. (1987). Assessment of major and daily stressful events during adolescence: The adolescent perceived events scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 534-541.
5. Foa, E. B., & Rothbaum, B. O. (1998). Treating the trauma of rape. New York: The Guilford Press.
6. Foster, S. L., & Mash, E. J. (1999). Assessing social validity in clinical treatment research: Issues and procedures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 308-319.
7. Hayes, S. C., Barlow, D. H., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1999). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in the age of managed care. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 266-286.
8. Henggeler, S. W., Lee, T., & Burns, J. A. (2002). What happens after the innovation is identified? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 191-194.
9. Kloss, J. D., & Lisman, S. A. (2002). An exposure-based examination of the effects of written emotional disclosure. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 31-46.
10. Linehan, M. M. (2000). The empirical basis of Dialectical Behavior Therapy: Development of new treatments versus evaluation of existing treatments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7, 113-119.
11. Pennebaker, J. W., & Beall, S. K. (1986). Confronting a traumatic event: Toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 274-281.
12. Reinecke, M. A. (1992). Childhood depression. In A. Freeman & F. M. Dattilio (Eds.), Comprehensive casebook of cognitive therapy (pp. 147-158). New York: Plenum Press.
13. Schoenwald, S. K, & Hoagwood, K. (2001). Effectiveness, transportability, and dissemination of interventions: What matters when? Psychiatric Services, 52, 1190-1197.
14. Sloan, D. M., & Marx, B. P. Taking pen to hand: Evaluating theories underlying the written disclosure paradigm. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 121-137.
15. Smyth, J. M. (1998). Written emotional expression: Effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 174-184.