Co-occurrence restrictions on identical consonants in the Hebrew lexicon: Are they due to similarity?

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 31-55

  Berent, Iris ^a   Shimron, Joseph ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542491736     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226702001949     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bat-El, O. (1994). Stem modification and cluster transfer in Modern Hebrew. Natural Language& Linguistic Theory 12. 571-596.
2. Bat-El, O. (2002). Hebrew reduplication: the interpretation of forms with identical consonants. Paper presented at a colloquium, Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California.
3. Bat-El, O. (2003). Semitic verb structure within a universal perspective. In Shimron, J. (ed.), Language processing and language acquisition in a root-based morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 29-59.
4. Bender, M. L.&Fulass, H. (1978). Amharic verb morphology, a generative approach. East Lansing, MI: African Studies Center, Michigan State University.
5. Berent, I., Bibi, U. & Tzelgov, J. (2000). The autonomous computation of linguistic structure in reading: evidence from the Stroop task. A paper submitted to the 41st meeting of the Psychonomic Society.
6. Berent, I. & Shimron, J. (1997). The representation of Hebrew words: evidence from the Obligatory Contour Principle. Cognition 64. 39-72.
7. Berent, I., Everett, D. & Shimron, J. (2001(a)). Do phonological representations specify formal variables ? Evidence from the Obligatory Contour Principle. Cognitive Psychology 42. 1-60.
8. Berent, I., Shimron, J.&Vaknin, V. (2001(b)). Phonological constraints on reading: evidence from the Obligatory Contour Principle. Journal of Memory and Language 44. 644-665.
9. Berent, I., Marcus, G., Shimron, J. & Gafos, A. (2002). The scope of linguistic generalizations: evidence from Hebrew word formation. Cognition 83. 113-139.
10. Bolozky, S. (1978). Some aspects of Modern Hebrew phonology. In Berman, R. (ed.), Modern Hebrew structure. Tel Aviv: Universities Publishing Projects. 11-67.
11. Buckley, E. (1997). Tigrinya root morphology and the OCP. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4.3. 19-51.
12. Even-Shoshan, A. (1993). Ha'milon ha'xadash [The new dictionary]. Jerusalem: Kiryat Sefer.
13. Everett, D. L. & Berent, I. (1998). An experimental approach to the OCP: evidence for violable identity constraints in Hebrew roots. Rutgers Optimality Archive (ROA-235).
14. Frisch, S. (in press). Language processing and segmentalOCPeffects. In Hayes, B., Kirchner, R.& Steriade, D. (eds.), Phonetic bases of markedness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Frisch, S., Broe, M. & Pierrehumbert, J. (1997). Similarity and phonotactics in Arabic. Ms., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
16. Frisch, S. A. & Zawaydeh, B. A. (2001). The psychological reality of OCP-place in Arabic. Language 77. 91-106.
17. Gafos, A. (1998). Eliminating long-distance consonantal spreading. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16. 223-278.
18. Greenberg, J. (1950). The patterning of root morphemes in Semitic. Word 6. 162-181.
19. McCarthy, J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12. 373-418.
20. McCarthy, J. (1986). OCP effects : gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 207-263.
21. McCarthy, J. (1994). The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals. In Keating, P. (ed.), Papers in laboratory phonology III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 191-283.
22. Pierrehumbert, J. (1993). Dissimilarity in Arabic verbal roots. In Proceedings of NELS 23, GLSA. Amherst, MA: Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts. 367-381.
23. Prunet, J. F., Béland, R. & Idrissi, A. (2000). The mental representation of Semitic words. Linguistic Inquiry 31. 609-648.
24. Rose, S. (2000). Rethinking geminates, long-distance geminates and the OCP. Linguistic Inquiry 31. 85-122.
25. Rose, S. & Walker, R. (2001). A typology of consonant agreement as correspondence. Ms., University of California at San Diego & University of Southern California.
26. Sandler, W. (1994). Suboral articulation. Ms., Haifa University.
27. Ussishkin, A. (1999). The inadequacy of the consonantal root:Modern Hebrew denominal verbs and output-output correspondence. Phonology 16. 401-442.
28. Ussishkin, A. (2000). The emergence of fixed prosody. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Santa Cruz.