Process library

Data and Knowledge Engineering

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 35-62

  Yang, Guangxin ^a  

^a LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

Author keywords

P; Process library; Process management; Process reuse

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; FORMAL LANGUAGES; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

PROCESS LANGUAGE; PROCESS LIBRARY; PROCESS MANAGEMENT; PROCESS REUSE;

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

EID: 2542485831     PISSN: 0169023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.datak.2004.01.003     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Ambriola V., Conradi R., Fuggetta A. Assessing process-centered software engineering environments. ACM TOSEM. 6(3):1997;283-328.
2. Bandinelli S., Nitto E.D., Fuggetta A. Supporting cooperation in the SPADE-1 environment. IEEE TOSE. 22(12):1996;841-865.
3. D.P. Bogia, S.M. Kaplan, Flexibility and control for dynamic workflows in the wOrlds environment, in: Proc. ACM COOCS, Milpitas, 1995, pp. 148-159.
4. A.G. Cass, B.S. Lerner, E.K. McCall, et al., Little-JIL/Juliette: a process definition language and interpreter, in: Proc. ACM/IEEE ICSE, Limerick, 2000, pp. 754-757.
5. Chen J.Y. CSPL:an Ada95-like, unix-based process environment. IEEE TOSE. 23(3):1997;171-184.
6. Conradi R., Hsgaseth M., Larsen J.-O., et al. EPOS: object-oriented cooperative process modeling. Finkelstein A., Nuseibeh B. Modeling and Technology. 1994;Research Studies Press, London, UK.
7. Curtis B., Kellner M.I., Over J. Process modeling. CACM. 35(9):1992;75-90.
8. A. Fuggetta, Software process: a roadmap, in: Proc. ACM/IEEE ICSE, Limerick, 2000, pp. 27-34.
9. Hammer M. Reengineering work: don't automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review. 46(4):1990;101-112.
10. H. Hart, J. Doland, D. Drake, et al., STARS process concepts summary, in: Proc. ACM TRI-Ada, Orlando, 1992, pp. 570-594.
11. D. Hollingsworth, The workflow reference model, WfMC-TC00-1003, 1995.
12. IBM WebSphere MQ Workflow. Available from 〈http://www.software.ibm. com/ts/mqseries/workflow〉 2003.
13. 3 language. ACM TOSEM. 7(4):1998;368-410.
14. T. Katayama, A hierarchical and functional software process description and its enaction, in: Proc. ACM/IEEE ICSE, Pittsburgh, 1989, pp. 243-252.
15. T. Katayama, S. Motizuki, What has been learned from applying a formal process model to a real process, in: Proc. IEEE ISPW, Washington, DC, 1991, pp. 79-81.
16. M.I. Kellner, Connecting reusable software process elements and components, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Software Process Workshop (ISPW), Dijon, 1996, pp. 8-11.
17. M. Klein, C. Dellarocas, A. Bernstein (Eds.), Special Issue on Adaptive Workflow Systems, CSCW 9(3-4) (2000) 265-455.
18. Krueger C.W. Software reuse. ACM Computing Surveys. 24(2):1992;131-183.
19. P. Maes, Concepts and experiments in computational reflection, in: Proc. ACM OOPLSA, Orlando, 1987, pp. 147-155.
20. Malon T.W., Crowston K., Lee J., et al. Tools for inventing organizations: toward a handbook of organizational processes. Management Science. 45(3):1999;425-443.
21. Montangero C., Ambriola V. OIKOS: constructing process-centered SDEs. Finkelstein A., Kramer J., Nuseibeh B. Software Process Modeling and Technology. 1994;131-152 Research Studies Press, London, UK.
22. L. Osterweil, Software processes are software too, In: Proc. ACM/IEEE ICSE, Monterey, 1987, pp. 2-13.
23. Paton N.W., Diaz O. Active database systems. ACM Computing Surveys. 31(1):1999;63-103.
24. D.E. Perry, Practical issues in process reuse, in: Proc IEEE ISPW, Dijon, 1996, pp. 12-14.
25. Staffware. Staffware 2000/GWD User Manual, Staffware Plc, UK, 2000.
26. Sutton S.M. Jr., Heimbigner D., Osterweil L.J. APPL/A: a language for software process programming. ACM TOSEM. 4(3):1996;221-286.
27. Taivalsaari A. On the notion of inheritance. ACM Computing Surveys. 28(3):1996;438-479.
28. W.J. Tolone, S.M. Kaplan, G. Fitzpatrick, Specifying dynamic support for collaborative work within WORLDS, in: Proc. ACM COOCS, Milpitas, 1995, pp. 55-65.
29. van der Aalst W.M.P., Basten T. Inheritance of workflows: an approach to tackling problems related to change. TCS. 270(12):2001;125-203.
30. W.M.P. van der Aalst, P.J.S. Berens, Beyond workflow management: product driven case handling, in: Proc. ACM GROUP, Boulder, 2001, pp. 42-51.
31. van der Aalst W.M.P., ter Hofstede A.H.M., Kiepuszewski B., et al. Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases. 14(3):2003;5-51.
32. van der Aalst W.M.P., van Hee K.M. Workflow management: models, methods, and systems. 2002;MIT press, Cambridge, MA.
33. 2 object-oriented workflow management system, in: Proc. ACM MOD, Philadelphia, 1999, pp. 587-589.
34. WfMC. Workflow process definition interface - XML process definition language. WFMC-TC-1025, 2002.
35. Yang G., Shi M. Cova: a programming language for cooperative applications. Science in China, Series F. 44(1):2001;73-80.
36. G. Yang, P language specification and library reference, Available from 〈http://blrc.edu.cn/research/p/〉 2003.
37. G. Yang, Towards a library for process programming, in: Proc. BPM, Eindhoven, 2003, pp. 120-135.
38. G. Yang, Process inheritance and instance modification, in: Proc. ACM GROUP, Sanibel Island, 2003, pp. 229-238.