Use of outcomes information in acute inpatient rehabilitation

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 83, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 468-478

  Beatty, Phillip W ^a   Neri, Melinda T ^b   Bell, Kianda ^b   DeJong, Gerben ^c  

^a Department of Health and Human Services   (United States)

^b NATIONAL REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Disclosure; Health Care; Outcomes; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; CONSENSUS; CONSUMER; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL CARE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; REVIEW;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ACUTE DISEASE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DATA COLLECTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HEALTH CARE SECTOR; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MARKETING; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUESTIONNAIRES; REHABILITATION; REHABILITATION CENTERS; RISK ADJUSTMENT; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 2542469754     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002060-200406000-00011     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. McGlynn EA: An evidence-based national quality measurement and reporting system. Med Care 2003;41(suppl):I-8-I-15
2. McGlynn EA: Introduction and overview of the conceptual framework for a national quality measurement and reporting system. Med Care 2003;41(suppl): I-1-I-7
3. McGlynn EA, Cassel CK, Leatherman ST, et al: Establishing national goals for quality improvement. Med Care 2003;41(suppl):I-16-I-29
4. Romano PS, Geppert JJ, Davies S, et al: A national profile of patient safety in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff 2003;22:154-66
5. Chassin MR: Achieving and sustaining improved quality: Lessons from New York state and cardiac surgery. Health Aff 2002;21:40-51
6. Devers KJ: Quality improvement by providers: Market developments hinder progress. Health Aff 2002;21:201-9
7. Scanlon DP, Darby C, Rolph E, et al: Use of performance information for quality improvement. Health Serv Res 2001;36:619-41
8. Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Leatherman S, et al: The public release of performance data: What do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. JAMA 2000;283:1866-74
9. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality Health Care In America: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 2001
10. Johnston M, Stineman M, Velozo C: Outcomes research in medical rehabilitation: Foundations from the past and directions for the future, in Fuhrer M (ed): Assessing Medical Rehabilitation Practices: The Promise of Outcomes Research. Baltimore, PH Brookes, 1997, pp 1-41
11. DeJong G: The case for public disclosure of rehabilitation outcomes, and the cultural barriers in health care to public disclosure. Keynote presentation made to the Second World Congress of the International Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Prague, Czech Republic, May 18-22, 2003
12. Wilkerson D, Johnston M: Outcomes research and clinical program monitoring systems: Current capability and future directions, in Fuhrer M (ed): Assessing Medical Rehabilitation Practices: The Promise of Outcomes Research. Baltimore, PH Brookes, 1997, pp 275-305
13. Johnston M, Wood K, Fiedler R: Characteristics of effective and efficient rehabilitation programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:410-8
14. DeJong G: Toward an evidence-based rehabilitation culture: The role of values, outcomes disclosure, and stakeholder groups. Rehabil Outlook 1999;4:110-1
15. Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Tusler M: Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts? Health Aff 2003;22:84-94
16. Thompson JW, Pinidiya SD, Ryan KW, et al: Health plan quality-of-care information is undermined by voluntary reporting. Am J Prev Med 2003;24:62-70
17. Carter GM, Beeuwkes-Buntin M, Hayden O, et al: Analysis for the Initial Implementation of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System: A Report Prepared for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Santa Monica, RAND, 2002
18. Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation: Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (Adult FIM): Version 4.0. Buffalo, NY, Research Foundation, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1993
19. Stineman MG: Prospective payment, prospective challenge. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1802-5
20. Stineman M, Escarce J, Goin J, et al: A case mix classification system for medical rehabilitation. Med Care 1994;32:366-79
21. Stineman M, Goin J, Granger C, et al: Discharge motor FIM: Function related groups. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:980-5
22. Heinemann A, Linacre J, Wright B, et al: Prediction of rehabilitation outcomes with disability measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:133-43
23. Sutton J, DeJong G, Wilkerson D: Function-based payment model for inpatient medical rehabilitation: An evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:693-701
24. Deutsch A, Fiedler RC, Granger CV, et al: The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report of patients discharged from comprehensive medical rehabilitation programs in 1999. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:133-42
25. Sisson R: Life after a stroke: Coping with change. Rehabil Nurs 1998;23:198-203
26. Chan R, Lee P, Lieh-Mak F: The pattern of coping in persons with spinal cord injuries. Disabil Rehabil 2000;22:501-7
27. Jewett JJ, Hibbard JH: Comprehension of quality care indicators: Differences among privately insured, publicly insured, and uninsured. Health Care Financing Rev 1996;18:75-94
28. Davies HTO, Washington AE, Bindman AB: Health care report cards: Implications for vulnerable patient groups and the organizations providing them care. J Health Polit Policy Law 2002;27:379-99
29. Hargraves JL, Trude S: Obstacles to employers' pursuit of health care quality. Health Aff 2002;21:194-200
30. Haley S, Coster W, Andres P, et al: Activity outcome measurement for post-acute care. Med Care 2004;42(1 suppl): 149-161