The effect of mass inconsistency of the meteorological field generated by a common meteorological model on air quality modeling

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 38, Issue 18, 2004, Pages 2917-2926

  Lee, Sang Mi ^a,c   Yoon, Soon Chang ^a   Byun, Daewon W ^b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^c Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Air quality modeling; CMAQ; Mass consistency; Mass inconsistent error; MM5

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; DATA REDUCTION; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METEOROLOGY; PRESSURE EFFECTS;

AIR QUALITY MODELS; INTEGRAL TIME; MASS INCONSISTENCY; MESOSCALE METEOROLOGICAL MODELS;

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY;

AIR QUALITY; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; MESOSCALE METEOROLOGY; NUMERICAL MODEL;

AIR QUALITY; ARTICLE; ERROR; HEATING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; METEOROLOGY; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 2542463848     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Affre C., Carrara A., Lefebre F., Diuilhet A., Fontan J., Lopez A. Aircraft measurement of ozone turbulent flux in the atmosphere boundary layer. Atmospheric Environment. 33:1999;1561-1574
2. Berge E., Kristjansson J.E. Numerical weather simulation with different formulations for the advection of humidity and cloud water. Monthly Weather Review. 120:1992;1583-1602
3. Bott A. A positive definite advection scheme obtained by nonlinear renormalization of the advective fluxes. Monthly Weather Review. 117:1989;1006-1015
4. Bott A. Monotone flux limitation in the area-preserving flux-form advection algorithm. Monthly Weather Review. 120:1992;2592-2602
5. Byun D.W. Dynamically consistent formulations in meteorological and air quality models for multi-scale atmospheric applications. Part II. Mass conservation issues Journal of the Atmospheric Science. 56:1999;3808-3820
6. Byun, D.W., Ching, J.K.S., 1999. Science algorithms of the EPA models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system, EPA/600/R-99/030, U.S. EPA.
7. Byun D.W., Lee S.M. Numerical solution of trace species advection under non-uniform density distribution. experiment with two-dimensional linear flows Chock D.P., Carmichael G.R. Atmospheric Modeling. 2002;109-151 Springer, New York
8. Carpenter R.L., Droegemeier K.K., Woodward P.R., Hane C.E. Application of the piecewise parabolic method (PPM) to meteorological modeling. Monthly Weather Review. 118:1990;586-612
9. Colella P., Woodward P.R. The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations. Journal of Computational Physics. 54:1984;174-201
10. Dickerson M.H. Mascon - A mass consistent atmospheric flux model for regions with complex terrain. Journal of Applied Meteorology. 17:1978;241-253
11. Dudhia, J., Gill, D., Manning, K., Wang, W., Bruyere, C., 2003. PSU/NCAR Mesoscale modeling system tutorial class notes and user's guide (MM5 modeling system version 3) (available from http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/mm5/ documents/tutorial-v3-notes.html).
12. Ge X., Li F., Ge M. Numerical analysis and case experiment for forecasting capability by using high accuracy moisture advectional algorithm. Meteorology Atmospheric Physics. 63:1997;131-148
13. Grell, G.A., Dudhia, J., Stauffer, D.R., 1995. A Description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-398+STR, 122pp.
14. Hidy G.M. Ozone process insights from field experiments Part 1. overview Atmospheric Environment. 34:2000;2001-2022
15. Kalnay E., et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 77:1996;437-471
16. Kitada T. Effect of non-zero divergence wind fields on atmospheric transport calculations. Atmospheric Environment. 21:1987;785-788
17. Ludwig F.L., Livingston J.M., Endlich R.M. Use of mass concentration and critical dividing streamlines concepts for efficient objective analysis of winds in complex terrain. Journal of the Applied Meteorlogy. 30:1991;1490-1499
18. Mathur R., Peters L.K. Adjustment of wind fields for application in air pollution modeling. Atmospheric Environment. 24A:1990;1095-1106
19. Neff W.D. The Denver brown cloud studies from the perspective of model assessment needs and the role of meteorology. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association. 47:1997;269-285
20. Reitebuch O., Strassburger A., Emeis S., Kuttler W. Nocturnal secondary ozone concentration maxima analysed by solar observations and surface measurements. Atmospheric Environment. 34:2000;4315-4329
21. Sasaki Y. Some basic formalisms in numerical variables analysis. Monthly Weather Review. 98:1970;875-883
22. Schieffe R.D., Morris R.E. A review of the development and application of the urban airshed model. Atmospheric Environment. 27B:1993;23-39
23. Seefeld S., Stockwell W. First order sensitivity analysis of models with time-dependent of parameters. an application to PAN and ozone Atmospheric Environment. 33:1999;2941-2953
24. Sherman C. A mass-consistent model for wind fields over complex terrain. Journal of Applied Meteorology. 17:1978;312-319
25. Sundqvist H., Berge E., Kristjansson J.E. Condensation and cloud parameterization studies with a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model. Monthly Weather Review. 117:1989;1641-1657
26. Warner T.T., Fizz R.R., Seaman N.L. A comparison of two types of atmospheric transport models - use of observed winds versus dynamically predicted winds. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology. 22:1983;394-406