Developmental function of very-low-birth-weight infants and full-term infants in early childhood

Journal of the Formosan Medical Association

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 23-31

  Chen, Pei Shan ^a   Jeng, Suh Fang ^a   Tsou, Kuo Inn ^b   Wang, Ai Hou ^c   Hsu, Chuan Jen ^c   Lu, Lu ^c   Hsu, Chyong Hsin ^d   Tsou, Kuo Su ^e   Fang, Li Jung ^e   Wang, Ming ^f   Huang, Shwu Huei ^f   Chen, Li Chiou ^f   Wu, Chia San ^f   Yu, Shiu Ying ^f   Kou, Ya Wen ^f   Mao, Sin Yu ^f  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b FU JEN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^d MACKAY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^e TAIPEI VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^f NONE

Author keywords

Developmental disabilities; Disability evaluation; Infant, premature; Infant, very low birth weight; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHRONIC LUNG DISEASE; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; DISEASE SEVERITY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GESTATIONAL AGE; HIGH SCHOOL; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MORBIDITY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RETROLENTAL FIBROPLASIA; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF HELP; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL INTERACTION; VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; NEWBORN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOMOTOR DISORDER;

DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMOTOR DISORDERS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 2542455842     PISSN: 09296646     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Palta M, Weinstein MR, McGuinness G, et al: A population study. Mortality and morbidity after availability of surfactant therapy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994;148:1295-301.
2. Stevenson DK, Wright LL, Lemons JA, et al: Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Developmental Neonatal Research Network, January 1993 through December 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1632-9.
3. National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. Research Plan for the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research (NIH Publication No. 93-3509). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1993.
4. Vohr BR, Msall ME: Neuropsychological and functional outcomes of very low birth weight infants. Semin Perinatol 1997;21:202-20.
5. Msall ME, Tremont MR: Functional outcomes in self-care, mobility, communication, and learning in extremely low-birth weight infants. Clin Perinatol 2000;27:381-401.
6. Mandich A, Miller L, Law M: Outcomes in evidence-based practice: In: Law M, ed. Evidence-Based Rehabilitation: A Guide to Practice. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc., 2002.
7. Veelken N, Stollhoff K, Claussen M: Development of very low birth weight infants: a regional study of 371 survivors. Eur J Pediatr 1991;150:815-20.
8. McCormick MC, Brooks-Gunn J, Workman-Daniels K, et al: The health and developmental status of very low-birth-weight children at school age. JAMA 1992;267:2204-8.
9. Weisglas-Kuperus N, Baerts W, Smrkovsky J, et al: Effects of biological and social factors on the cognitive development of very low birthweight children. Pediatrics 1993;92:658-65.
10. Hack M, Taylor HG, Klein N, et al: School-age outcomes in children with birth weights under 750 g. N Engl J Med 1994;331:753-9.
11. Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Stevenson DK, et al: Very-low-birth-weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Developmental Neonatal Research Network, May 1991 through December 1992. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1423-31.
12. Wilson-Costello D, Borawski E, Friedman H, et al: Perinatal correlates of cerebral palsy and other neurologic impairment among very low birth weight children. Pediatrics 1998;102:315-22.
13. Hack M, Wilson-Costello D, Friedman HF, et al: Neurodevelopment and predictors of outcomes of children with birth weights of less than 1000 g. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:725-31.
14. Jeng SF, Yau KIT, Liao HF, et al: Prognostic factors for walking attainment in very low-birthweight preterm infants. Early Hum Dev 2000;59:159-73.
15. Lester BM, Miller-Loncar L: Biology versus environment in the extremely low-birth weight infants. Clin Perinatol 2000;27:461-81.
16. Saigal S: Follow-up of very low birthweight babies to adolescence. Semin Neonatol 2000;5:107-18.
17. Taylor HG, Klein N, Minich NM, et al: Middle-school-age outcomes in children with very low birthweight. Child Development 2000;71:1495-511.
18. Vohr BR, Wright LL, Dusick AM, et al: Neurodevelopmental and functional outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, 1993-1994. Pediatrics 2000;105:1216-26.
19. Vohr BR, Allan WC, Westerveld M, et al: School-age outcomes of very low birth weight infants in the Indomethicin Intraventricular Hemorrhage prevention trial. Pediatrics 2003;111:e340-6.
20. Hsu CC, Su S, Shao SJ, et al: Chinese child development inventory: a tentative normative data. Acta Paediatr Sin 1978;19:142-56.
21. Frankenburg WK, Dodds JB, Fandel AW. Denver Developmental Screening Test Manual. Denver, Colorado: LADOCA Project & Publishing Foundation, 1973.
22. Hsieh TT, Hsu JJ, Chen CJ, et al: Analysis of birth weight and gestational age in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 1991;90:382-7.
23. Papile LA, Munsick-Bruno G, Schaefer A: Relationship of cerebral intraventricular hemorrhage and early childhood neurologic handicaps. J Pediatr 1983;103:273-7.
24. Bancalari E, Abdenour GE, Feller R, et al: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: clinical presentation. J Pediatr 1979;95:819-23.
25. Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity: An International classification of retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:1130-4.
26. Bayley N, Bayley scales of infant development. 2nd ed. San Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace & Company, 1993.
27. Lee ET. Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis. Second ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1992.
28. Streiner DL, Norman GR: From items to scales. In: Streiner DL, Norman GR, eds. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 1989:67-78.
29. Campbell SK, Siegel E, Parr CA, et al: Evidence for the need to reform the Bayley Scales of Infant Development based on the performance of a population-based sample of 12-month-old infants. Top Early Child Special Edu 1986;83-96.
30. Hu SY, Hsieh MH, Chen SN, et al: Correlations between Chinese Child Development Questionnaire quotients and Bayley Scales of Infant Development indices. Taiwan J Psychiatry 1997;11:242-8.
31. Bendersky M, Lewis M: Environmental risk, biological risk, and developmental outcome. Dev Psychol 1994;30:484-94.