Why Ni3Al is an itinerant ferromagnet but Ni3Ga is not

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 14, 2004, Pages

  Aguayo, A ^a,b   Mazin, I I ^a   Singh, D J ^a  

^a NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; BAND STRUCTURE; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; FERMI LIQUIDS; FERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS; INTEGRATION; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; NICKEL COMPOUNDS; PARAMAGNETISM; PHASE DIAGRAMS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SUPERCONDUCTIVITY;

FLUCTUATION-DISSIPATION THEOREM; GENERALIZED GRADIENT APPROXIMATION (GGA); LOCAL-DENSITY APPROXIMATION (LDA); QUANTUM CRITICAL POINTS (QCP);

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 2542455120     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.147201     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. R. B. Laughlin et al., Adv. Phys. 50, 361 (2001).
2. S. S. Saxena et al., Nature (London) 406, 587 (2000).
3. D. Aoki et al., Nature (London) 413, 613 (2001).
4. C. Pfleiderer et al., Nature (London) 412, 58 (2001).
5. C. P. Pfleiderer, S. R. Julian, and G. G. Lonzarich, Nature (London) 414, 427 (2001).
6. F. R. de Boer et al., J. Appl. Phys. 40, 1049 (1969).
7. P. G. Niklowitz, F. Beckers, N. Bernhoeft, D. Braithwaite, G. Knebel, B. Salce, J. Thomasson, J. Floquet, and G. G. Lonzarich (unpublished); in Proceedings of the Conference on Quantum Complexities in Condensed Matter, 2003.
8. S. M. Hayden, G. G. Lonzarich, and H. L. Skriver, Phys. Rev. B 33, 4977 (1986).
9. M. J. Steiner et al., Physica B (Amsterdam) 329, 1079 (2003).
10. D. J. Singh and I. I. Mazin, Phys. Rev. B 63, 165101 (2001).
11. D. J. Singh and I. I. Mazin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 187004 (2002).
12. A. Aguayo and D. J. Singh, Phys. Rev. B 66, 020401 (2002).
13. D. J. Singh, Phys. Rev. B 68, 020503 (2003).
14. This is distinct from the well-known problems that the LDA has in systems with strong Hubbard correlations, so such a signature should not be interpreted as evidence of strong Hubbard correlations.
15. J. J. Buiting, J. Klübler, and F. M. Mueller, J. Phys. F 13, L179 (1983).
16. V. L. Moruzzi and P. M. Marcus, Phys. Rev. B 42, 5539 (1990).
17. B. I. Min, A. J. Freeman, and H. J. F. Jansen, Phys. Rev. B 37, 6757 (1988).
18. J. H. Xu et al., Phys. Rev. B 41, 5010 (1990).
19. G. Y Guo, Y. K. Wang, and Li-Shing Hsu, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 239, 91 (2002).
20. L.-S. Hsu, Y.-K. Wang, and G.Y. Guo, J. Appl. Phys. 92, 1419 (2002).
21. D. J. Singh, Planewaves Pseudopotentials and the LAPW Method (Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1994).
22. D. Singh, Phys. Rev. B 43, 6388 (1991).
23. S. H. Wei and H. Krakauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1200 (1985).
24. P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. K. H. Madsen, D. Kvasnicka, and J. Luitz, WIEN2K, An Augmented Plane Wave + Local Orbitals Program for for Calculating Crystal Properties (Techn. Universitat Wien, Austria, 2001), ISBN 3-9501031-1-2.
25. H. Winter, Z. Szotek, and W. M. Temmerman, Solid State Commun. 74, 547 (1990).
26. G. L. Krasko, Phys. Rev. B, 36, 8565 (1987).
27. 3Al [28], which agrees with the experimental volume LDA value [29]. We used the calculated value B′ = 5.2.
28. F. Wallow, G. Neite, W. Schroer, and E. Nembach, Phys. Status Solidi A 99, 483 (1987).
29. J. E. Osburn, M. J. Mehl, and B. M. Klein, Phys. Rev. B 43, 1805 (1991).
30. M. Shimizu, Rep. Prog. Phys. 44, 329 (1981).
31. P. Larson, I. I. Mazin, and D. J. Singh, Phys. Rev. B 69, 064429 (2004).
32. I. I. Mazin, D. J. Singh, and A. Aguayo, cond-mat/0401563.
33. T. Moriya and A. Kawabata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 34, 639 (1973).
34. B. Efron and R. J. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap (Chapmann and Hall, New York, 1993).
35. F the reversal takes place.
36. N. R. Bernhoeft et al., Phys. Rev. B 28, 422 (1983); Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 657 (1989).
37. N. R. Bernhoeft et al., Phys. Rev. B 28, 422 (1983); Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 657 (1989).